Cont: Musk buys Twitter II

It offers unconditional support to the far right etnically exclusive Israeli project, reflexively labelling even the most modest justified criticism as anti-semitic. I could make a very strong case that the ADL is national socialist adjacent.

The ADL is a strange choice considering other targets, like the SPLC or other "hate-watch" groups, that are much more strident in their criticism and much more open about their attempts to persuade advertisers to not support hate mongers.

I really don't see what's so special about the ADL to deserve this special treatment other than being the explicitly Jewish one.
 
The ADL is a strange choice considering other targets, like the SPLC or other "hate-watch" groups, that are much more strident in their criticism and much more open about their attempts to persuade advertisers to not support hate mongers.

I really don't see what's so special about the ADL to deserve this special treatment other than being the explicitly Jewish one.

He has also said he will sue the Centre for Countering Digital Hate and the state of California for its proposed social media transparency bill.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/08/elon-musk-twitter-lawsuit-california-free-speech

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...h-group-accuses-elon-musk-x-corp-intimidation
 
i think the ADL is a completely different brand of right wingy-ness than the kind drawn to musk. but if you're going to advocate for an orthodox religion or the israeli government, well you're going to be right wingy from time to time
 
No they're tankies. But then again tankies were always about shaping over substance.

Wait a minute.

Since the tankies are the ones who defend Russia's use of military force to crush internal dissent, aren't the pro-Russia American right wingers the 'tankies' in this scenario?

You know, the right wingers that are saying that it's OK for Russia to attack Ukraine...
 
The real interesting thing about Elon's anti-ADL screed is that he seems to be saying that the company has gone from being worth 44 billion when he paid for it to only 4 billion today



https://finance.yahoo.com/news/according-elon-musk-own-math-204413573.html

Obviously Elon is a notorious liar and nobody should really take any figure he gives at face value, but it's telling that even in Elon's fantasy world there's no denying how disastrously Twitter is tanking since he's taken over.

Even if his wildest dreams came true and courts found the ADL liable for a huge defamation payment (lol, not gonna happen) they simply don't have the ability to cover such a huge loss. The damage Musk has done to the company may well be irreversible at this point.

You obviously don’t understand investing like musk does. He bought it at $44b and it was therefore worth much more in his hand, like at least $90b. Now it is only worth $50b and the Jews are responsible for at least 10% of that drop in value.

The math is a lot different when talking to the IRS.
 
I think I could make a strong case they're National Socialist adjacent. At least as strong as the ADL, and probably stronger.

Quite a lot of tankies went over to the hard and far right very quickly after the Berlin Wall fell, far more than you would expect if you thought they were USSR fanobys for the ideology, rather than for the authoritarianism.
 
Wait a minute.

Since the tankies are the ones who defend Russia's use of military force to crush internal dissent, aren't the pro-Russia American right wingers the 'tankies' in this scenario?

You know, the right wingers that are saying that it's OK for Russia to attack Ukraine...

To be properly a tankie you must have supported Russia when it was still the USSR. The name originates from those who supported the red army tanks rolling into Budapest in 1956.
 
Nah, nah, nah...

Pronounce the X like the X in xylophone.

Zitter.

And each toxic post is a zit.

And when Musk finally gets the flick, we can all say that the biggest zit has been squeezed out.
According to the news media, the official name appears to be "X, previously known as Twitter".
 
It's Twitter, nothing else.


When a Stadion gets a new sponsor and renames itself, that doesn't mean you have to use that name. It's only temporary, anyway.

Or does anyone believe that Twitter will still be owned by Musk in 5 years ?
 
It's Twitter, nothing else.


When a Stadion gets a new sponsor and renames itself, that doesn't mean you have to use that name. It's only temporary, anyway.

Or does anyone believe that Twitter will still be owned by Musk in 5 years ?

Who's going to buy it off him?

I suppose it's possible that it will be owned by the banks in five years.
 
Who's going to buy it off him?

I suppose it's possible that it will be owned by the banks in five years.

exactly.

Musk is busy loading Twitter up with debt, and he will just let it go bankrupt, at which point someone will pay $1 for the name and platform.
 
Elon Musk has suggested that all users of X, formerly called Twitter, may have to pay for access to the platform.

In a conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the billionaire said a payment system was the only way to counter bots.

"We're moving to having a small monthly payment for use of the system," the Tesla and SpaceX boss said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66850821
 
Or of social media web sites.

As I've commented before he's coming at this as if he is someone new to the sector, he's going through all the easy and obvious ideas people in the past have had (and that have already failed to deliver their goals).

So far he isn't showing any signs of being able to bring anything new to the table.
 

Back
Top Bottom