• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Mr. Lloyd Pye and the Starchild Skull

I'm suffering from Saywhattohooie? I can't spell it, much less describe it! :D

Seriously, what is SIWOTI Syndrome? I've got no idea. And thanks for the welcome... it's nice to be here!

Squid
 
Squid said:
I'm suffering from Saywhattohooie? I can't spell it, much less describe it! :D

Seriously, what is SIWOTI Syndrome? I've got no idea. And thanks for the welcome... it's nice to be here!

Squid
Click to expand...
someone is wrong on the internet

I'm a sufferer myself.
 
Squid said:
I'm suffering from Saywhattohooie? I can't spell it, much less describe it! :D

Seriously, what is SIWOTI Syndrome? I've got no idea. And thanks for the welcome... it's nice to be here!

Squid
Click to expand...
It's a catch-phrase from the xkcd webcomic:

472126_d0f3fbd2-ec7b-4ea5-a766-97e6ea3b4ca1_prod.jpg
 
Last edited:
Bumping this thread because Lloyd Pye is apparently claiming that he's finally got DNA evidence that shows the "Starchild" is part alien. Is there a smiley for an eye roll? At the end of the post, Pye asks for money, quelle surprise.

Anyway, the claims were posted on one of the sillier conspiracy sites, Godlike Productions, but I think the original claims went out on a mass email or something. I'm just going to copy/past a few parts of the post.

"We finally have a recovery of nuclear DNA from the Starchild!"

"This past weekend I met with the geneticist working on the Starchild's DNA. He explained how he can now prove the Starchild is not entirely human, which has been our position for years. Now it is no longer a question of "if," but of "when" and "how" we spread this astounding new reality beyond the mailing list. First, though, let me bring the list's newcomers up to speed."

The next two screen shots are taken from the national genetic database at the National Institute of Health, NIH. That public-access database is a centralized repository of all genetic information generated by geneticists all over the world, and now covers essentially all living organisms on Earth, from various kinds of viruses and bacteria, to various kinds of crustaceans and fish, to all kinds of animals and plants, including great apes and humans.

For many species, humans included, there are already nucleotide sequences covering entire genomes. Therefore, sequences from the Starchild's DNA can be directly compared against this vast database to look for any matches. In one such comparison below, you see the text below the blue line at the bottom (if you can read it, sorry it's so fuzzy) that 265 base pairs (a good length) of recovered Starchild nuclear DNA matches perfectly with a gene on human chromosome 1. This verifies beyond any degree of doubt that some of the nuclear DNA seen in the gel sheet is from a human being.

In the one below, and again at the bottom, you see the stunning report that in a string of 342 base pairs (another good length), "No significant similarity (is) found." To recover a stretch of base pairs as long as that with NO reference in the NIH database is astounding because it means there is no known earthly corollary for what has been analyzed! This incredible anomaly will put the Starchild in history books!!!

And I can't post links yet, but if you go to Godlike Productions and search for "Starchild", it's there somewhere.
 
Multiple exclamation marks are ONLY used when something that is being stated is 100% fact.
 
teedot said:
In the one below, and again at the bottom, you see the stunning report that in a string of 342 base pairs (another good length), "No significant similarity (is) found." To recover a stretch of base pairs as long as that with NO reference in the NIH database is astounding because it means there is no known earthly corollary for what has been analyzed! This incredible anomaly will put the Starchild in history books!!!
.
Click to expand...

Just in case anyones wondering, there are 3 billion base pairs in the human genome (!!!!!!!), so finding only 342 dissimilar to anything else on record says nothing, unless its a comment once again on the fact that Lloyd Pye knows next to nothing about anything
:rolleyes:

I mean apart from anything else, hes just tested for human dna and retrieved a result thats meaningless and instead of looking at factors which would explain that
1. DNA degradation (consistant result of previous tests on this specimen)
2. Poor test protocols (Lloyd pye chose the lab)
3. The lineage is extinct (very very common, the specimen has no surviving relatives who's dna has passed on to the modern genome)
so, hes moved straight onto "Aliens".
did it occour to anyone else that if hes using a test which produced a result of 342 base pairs then that fact alone "base pairs" mean that the sample must be terrestrial, Dna is endemic to this planet and this planet alone
so effectively, hes just proven that the "starchild" is fully human, (unless the father was a petunia)
what a complete and utter tard
:p
 
Last edited:
Marduk said:
Just in case anyones wondering, there are 3 billion base pairs in the human genome (!!!!!!!), so finding only 342 dissimilar to anything else on record says nothing, unless its a comment once again on the fact that Lloyd Pye knows next to nothing about anything
:rolleyes:

I mean apart from anything else, hes just tested for human dna and retrieved a result thats meaningless and instead of looking at factors which would explain that
1. DNA degradation (consistant result of previous tests on this specimen)
2. Poor test protocols (Lloyd pye chose the lab)
3. The lineage is extinct (very very common, the specimen has no surviving relatives who's dna has passed on to the modern genome)
so, hes moved straight onto "Aliens".
did it occour to anyone else that if hes using a test which produced a result of 342 base pairs then that fact alone "base pairs" mean that the sample must be terrestrial, Dna is endemic to this planet and this planet alone
so effectively, hes just proven that the "starchild" is fully human, (unless the father was a petunia)
what a complete and utter tard
:p
Click to expand...
You know, thinking about the human mating with a petunia ... why hasn't all this mating with condoms produced a ProphylacticChild?
 
Marduk said:
Just in case anyones wondering, there are 3 billion base pairs in the human genome (!!!!!!!), so finding only 342 dissimilar to anything else on record says nothing, unless its a comment once again on the fact that Lloyd Pye knows next to nothing about anything
:rolleyes:

I mean apart from anything else, hes just tested for human dna and retrieved a result thats meaningless and instead of looking at factors which would explain that
1. DNA degradation (consistant result of previous tests on this specimen)
2. Poor test protocols (Lloyd pye chose the lab)
3. The lineage is extinct (very very common, the specimen has no surviving relatives who's dna has passed on to the modern genome)
so, hes moved straight onto "Aliens".
did it occour to anyone else that if hes using a test which produced a result of 342 base pairs then that fact alone "base pairs" mean that the sample must be terrestrial, Dna is endemic to this planet and this planet alone
so effectively, hes just proven that the "starchild" is fully human, (unless the father was a petunia)
what a complete and utter tard
:p
Click to expand...

I quoted you at another forum, Marduk, and someone replied,

"DNA is endemic to this planet,and this planet alone? How does he or she know this?"

I think that person is appealing to the unknown, but I'd like to hear Marduk's answer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom