Molten Steel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Show us a "thermite cutter charge" capable of cutting a steel box column that existed in 2001 or admit thermite is NOT an explanation. Anything less is a denial tactic.
Demanding what I could not possibly know is a denial tactic.

Acetylene could not possibly be the cause of the molten steel.

The only possibility is thermite.

To deny that is just denial.
 
Demanding what I could not possibly know is a denial tactic..
Asking for an explanation is not a denial tactic. Pretending something that does not exist really does exist is a denial tactic

Acetylene could not possibly be the cause of the molten steel.
Acetylene when combined with oxygen burns at a temperature of 3200 °C to 3500 °C (5800 °F to 6300 °F),

The only possibility is thermite.
"THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES" DO NOT EXIST

To deny that is just denial.
 
"Thermite cutter charges" right. :rolleyes:
Right. :)

You don't have a clue what the state of the art is or was.

Your denial is based in personal incredulity.

You cannot accept the only possible explanation for the molten steel because that blows the OCT to which you are fanatically loyal.
 
Asking for an explanation is not a denial tactic. Pretending something that does not exist really does exist is a denial tactic

Acetylene when combined with oxygen burns at a temperature of 3200 °C to 3500 °C (5800 °F to 6300 °F),


"THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES" DO NOT EXIST

To deny that is just denial.
You haven't got a clue what the state of the art is or was.
 
Right. :)
You don't have a clue what the state of the art is or was..
YES I DO.


Your denial is based in personal incredulity.
SHOW US THE THERMITE CUTTER CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYTHING LESS IS A DENIAL TACTIC.

You cannot accept the only possible explanation for the molten steel because that blows the OCT to which you are fanatically loyal.
Such a pathetic response homeland would facepalm.
 
You can shout all you want.

That will not change the fact that the only explanation for the molten steel is thermite.

No, you posted a paper; YOU posted a paper that says it was fire.

Why do you post a paper showing steel burned in office fires then make a lie?

Here is the proof reviewed by Dr A, and you agree with him with this post fire did it. You have messed up and posted the proof of fire being the culprit at the WTC. Read it again it does not mention thermite/thermate or other delusions you have on 911.
 
Last edited:
I have answered the question.
So you admit there is no such thing there is a thermite cutter charge.

I don't know.
I know. It's because you are in denial
Neither do you.
I know they do not exist. Don't believe me? Just show us one that existed in 2001.

There is no other explanation for the molten steel.

Come up with one or stop denying that it was thermite.
Been there done that.

OLD FART said:
:wackyrealmad: explanation crap.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4549894#post4549894 :p
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom