Demanding what I could not possibly know is a denial tactic.Show us a "thermite cutter charge" capable of cutting a steel box column that existed in 2001 or admit thermite is NOT an explanation. Anything less is a denial tactic.
Acetylene?
Right![]()
Asking for an explanation is not a denial tactic. Pretending something that does not exist really does exist is a denial tacticDemanding what I could not possibly know is a denial tactic..
Acetylene when combined with oxygen burns at a temperature of 3200 °C to 3500 °C (5800 °F to 6300 °F),Acetylene could not possibly be the cause of the molten steel.
"THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES" DO NOT EXISTThe only possibility is thermite.
Right."Thermite cutter charges" right.![]()
You haven't got a clue what the state of the art is or was.Asking for an explanation is not a denial tactic. Pretending something that does not exist really does exist is a denial tactic
Acetylene when combined with oxygen burns at a temperature of 3200 °C to 3500 °C (5800 °F to 6300 °F),
"THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES" DO NOT EXIST
To deny that is just denial.
YES I DO.Right.
You don't have a clue what the state of the art is or was..
SHOW US THE THERMITE CUTTER CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYTHING LESS IS A DENIAL TACTIC.Your denial is based in personal incredulity.
Such a pathetic response homeland would facepalm.You cannot accept the only possible explanation for the molten steel because that blows the OCT to which you are fanatically loyal.
you haven't got a clue what the state of the art is or was.
You can shout all you want.Such a pathetic response homeland would facepalm.
That will not change the fact that the only explanation for the molten steel is thermite.
Asked and answered.yes i do. The claim is yours. Show us a "thermite cutter charge" capable of cutting a steel box column that existed in 2001.tactic.
Asked and answered.
Your question is rhetorical.
I have answered the question.You have not answered it because you are in denial.
You can shout all you want.
That will not change the fact that the only explanation for the molten steel is thermite.
Here is the proof reviewed by Dr A, and you agree with him with this post fire did it. You have messed up and posted the proof of fire being the culprit at the WTC. Read it again it does not mention thermite/thermate or other delusions you have on 911.
So you admit there is no such thing there is a thermite cutter charge.I have answered the question.
I know. It's because you are in denialI don't know.
I know they do not exist. Don't believe me? Just show us one that existed in 2001.Neither do you.
Been there done that.There is no other explanation for the molten steel.
Come up with one or stop denying that it was thermite.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4549894#post4549894OLD FART said:explanation crap.
I not make lie.No, you posted a paper; YOU posted a paper that says it was fire.
Why do you post a paper showing steel burned in office fires then make a lie?

Is English your first language?So you admit there is no such thing there is a thermite cutter charge.
What part of "I don't know" don't you understand?I know. It's because you are in denial
I know they do not exist? Don't believe me? Just show us one that existed in 2001.
I not make lie.
You make lie!![]()
Yes.Is English your first language?
What part of "show us a 'thermite cutter charge' or admit they don't exist" don't you understand?What part of "I don't know" don't you understand?