Molten metal in basement of WTC

I am so glad there is a 9/11 Movement. My father is a policeman and he believes it was an inside job too.
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have a four minute video but it I am not allowed to show it until I reach 15 posts. Why?
Click to expand...
I think it's to help stop drive-by spamming of links. Try posting the link without the http bit (or knock out a quick 5 posts on the Humor forum).
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I am sorry I do not understand your point? Even a member of NIST denies that fire alone would create temperatures to cause pools of molten metal.
Click to expand...


Ummm. From NIST:

Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing.
Click to expand...
Is this the video you are talking about:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7180303712325092501&hl=en


Cheers,
SLOB
 
Last edited:
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have a four minute video but it I am not allowed to show it until I reach 15 posts. Why?
Click to expand...
If this is the one where the claw is picking up red hot metal you might want to look up the difference between "red hot" and "molten".
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have footage of a NIST spokesman admitting fires would not create molten metal. I have footage of a NIST spokesman squirming like a worm on a hot tin plate when been asked questions about the lava like scenario by 'Pilots for Truth'. If you understand body language you will see that this man is lying through his teeth and proved to be doing so. There are so many lies surrounding 9/11, anyone who does not see these lies is either mentally ill, a moron or an agent. Period!
Click to expand...
Yes, "Pilots for Trooth" is an excellent source of lies about 9/11.
 
I have studied body language as part of my nirse training and the NIST man in this video is lying so much. It is such a giveaway, even with the sound down. Why is he lying. Why are spokesman of NIST who were responsible for finding out the truth about 9/11 lying?

They are ALL lying.
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have studied body language as part of my nirse training and the NIST man in this video is lying so much. It is such a giveaway, even with the sound down. Why is he lying. Why are spokesman of NIST who were responsible for finding out the truth about 9/11 lying?

They are ALL lying.
Click to expand...

Oh for crying out loud. This is a skeptic board. If you have real evidence of wrong doing give it up, but please don't try to accuse innocent people of mass murder because you have "studied body language as part of my nirse training".

Nobody's going to buy that crap.
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have studied body language as part of my nirse training and the NIST man in this video is lying so much. It is such a giveaway, even with the sound down. Why is he lying. Why are spokesman of NIST who were responsible for finding out the truth about 9/11 lying?

They are ALL lying.
Click to expand...
That's some training - I wish I could always tell when people are lying to me!
Oh, and NIST were responsible for finding out why the buildings collapsed, which is only part of the truth.
 
Lizzy Dripping said:
I have studied body language as part of my nirse training and the NIST man in this video is lying so much. It is such a giveaway, even with the sound down. Why is he lying. Why are spokesman of NIST who were responsible for finding out the truth about 9/11 lying?

They are ALL lying.
Click to expand...

Well, was that the video you were talking about? If so, could you please quote, verbatim, the question "Unknown man" asks at the beginning, regarding this liquid?

Cheers,
SLOB
 
Please note the title of that video and stop confusing STEEL with METAL.

There is no evidence there was molten steel. Eye-witness who said they saw molten steel were mistaken (an easy and highly forgivable mistake). The fires were plenty hot enough to melt aluminum. There was plenty of aluminum. Your NIST quote, as usual, is severely misinterpreted.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. So, please do not tell me there wasn't fire in the rubble when there is smoke coming out of it.

I understand you've done some "research" on some trashy websites but I assure you that this nonsense you are spouting here is well debunked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom