[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[Gravy]

Please do. Let's see how far you get.

Believe me when I speak for the "Elite Pentagon Research Team" and say we're not worried or guilty of anything.

But I find your tactics pretty inane, do you really think we would put ourselves at risk in accusing anybody of anything.

We know that is this your last resort, fellas...so bring it on.

Once again:

Did Sgt. Lagasse say that flight 77 hit the Pentagon or not?

Now, please answer: do you think Lloyde England, Mike Walters, and Stephen McGraw are telling the truth? Or do you think they are lying?

Interested parties await your response.

By the way, S4S, which FBI Evidence Response Team members did you speak with again?

Interested parties await your response.

 

[Alt+F4]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Right?

Just agree with me, or show me how it is still possible.

You've presented NO evidence that AA77 or any other plane was flying north of the Citgo station.

 

[Arus808]

omg over the last two pages, sceptic has commited the most erroneous leaps in logic i've ever seen. My logic teacher would be shaking his head at what he has posted in the last two pages.

Logic is severely lacking in sceptics mind.

 

[Garb]

Really, please do elaborate Gumboot.

Explain how the plane passing on the North side of the Citgo is going to impact the poles and the building in the same way to cause the damage we saw on 9/11.

It isn't. That's why your witnesses are incorrect.

 

[Gravy]

omg over the last two pages, sceptic has commited the most erroneous leaps in logic i've ever seen. My logic teacher would be shaking his head at what he has posted in the last two pages.

If that's you on the racing bike, your logic teacher has more to answer for!

 

[gumboot]

Really, please do elaborate Gumboot.

Explain how the plane passing on the North side of the Citgo is going to impact the poles and the building in the same way to cause the damage we saw on 9/11.

That is not the logic process I am criticising. You claimed if the aircraft passed north of CITGO it must not have hit The Pentagon. This is totally false.

-Gumboot

 

[beachnut]

Really, please do elaborate Gumboot.

Explain how the plane passing on the North side of the Citgo is going to impact the poles and the building in the same way to cause the damage we saw on 9/11.

You must be short on something, or just here to talk! You say a plane on the north side flew over the Pentagon. You give not time to go with this. There is real evidence the plane hit poles and hit the Pentagon (pole hit by vehicle doing 500 mph, DNA in building, flight 77 in building). Now you say you have proof to disprove physical evidence. You are at the right place. You are saying a plane that did not hit the Pentagon flew over the north side of Citgo and did nothing more.

You have not proved anything happened or did not happen. Sorry but you have nothing. You are incapable of making a presentation, and you have no way to disprove anything by talking..

You are a non-event because you have said nothing. Zero facts, zero evidence; just zero. 0

 

[chipmunk stew]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Right?

Just agree with me, or show me how it is still possible.

Wrong. It would mean a plane was seen North of the Citgo station. The rest of the evidence indicates flight 77 hit the poles on its way to crashing into the Pentagon. Which would make your hypothetical plane a different plane.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Once again:

Did Sgt. Lagasse say that flight 77 hit the Pentagon or not?

Now, please answer: do you think Lloyde England, Mike Walters, and Stephen McGraw are telling the truth? Or do you think they are lying?

Interested parties await your response.

By the way, S4S, which FBI Evidence Response Team members did you speak with again?

Interested parties await your response.

Mark Roberts,

You are not initimidating anybody my friend.

Really you aren't, I know you are trying to. But you aren't.

You have my answers on your questions.

I suggest you find another hobby.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

I think it is safe to assume you won't get an answer, Regnad.

Apparently.

This seems to be just a game for some people.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Wrong. It would mean a plane was seen North of the Citgo station. The rest of the evidence indicates flight 77 hit the poles on its way to crashing into the Pentagon. Which would make your hypothetical plane a different plane.

OK whatever you say.

You are going to swept up in the tidal wave Chip, and there won't be anything you can do to stop it.

 

[Horatius]

It's okay to have impressions of people, and to even change them based on later information.

What's not okay is to have assinine impressions like "So-and-so might be an agent" and "Such-and-so may have been hypnotized".

If you were smart (which you're not), you'd know that, wouldn't you?

You know I didn't make those comments right?

Did you notice that the first two comments were of a general nature? You do know that means they aren't addressed solely to you, right?

The only part that was solely addressed to you was the bit about you being stupid, which you're doing a wonderful job of substantiating for me. Just to clairify for the stupid (that's you), not being smart == stupid. Just to avoid you whining about how I didn't actually call you stupid.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

You simply don't see things when you don't want to.

This is an outright accusation by Lyte Trip, aka Craig, not an anonymous guy on the internet:

There is no equivocation in these statements. They are outright accusations.

Right, but did he make that quote as anoymous Pentagon researcher for LC or was he Craig the member of the Elite Pentagon research team who hasn't made any official claims in his presentation?

And honestly you should use another person than Lloyd, his account is going to suffer the most turmoil.

 

[Bell]

OK whatever you say.

You are going to swept up in the tidal wave Chip, and there won't be anything you can do to stop it.

That tidal wave was a conspiracy too.

 

[beachnut]

OK whatever you say.

You are going to swept up in the tidal wave Chip, and there won't be anything you can do to stop it.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhh

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Apparently.

This seems to be just a game for some people.

And an obsession for others...

 

[chipmunk stew]

OK whatever you say.

You are going to swept up in the tidal wave Chip, and there won't be anything you can do to stop it.

Here's a tidal wave

to go with your explosive evidence

 

[Brainache]

Ahem...witnesses.




Why because you said so? Right, because physical evidence in a crime has never been staged before.

Not because I say so. Just think about it for a few minutes. If after those few minutes you still think it is possible to fake all of the physical evidence at the Pentagon(not just the poles), then I think you really aren't thinking very clearly at all.

Why is it impossible? Because you say it is impossible? The plane was on the North side of the gas station, the poles weren't hit by the plane and they weren't blown out. So the only other alternative is staging.

It's not just the poles that need to be staged. It's the plane wreckage, the bodies, the black boxes, the damage to the stuff in front of the building and the cars on the highway. Not to mention making the damage inside the building exactly consistant with a bloody great plane crashing into it at 500 miles per hour. Why do you overlook all that stuff?

 

[apathoid]

Wrong. It would mean a plane was seen North of the Citgo station. The rest of the evidence indicates flight 77 hit the poles on its way to crashing into the Pentagon. Which would make your hypothetical plane a different plane.

Actually, there was a plane seen north of the Citgo diving toward the Pentagon in the same direction of flight as AA77.....a C-130. The two pieces of evidence(light poles and a plane flying along a flight path north of said poles) are not mutaully exclusive. Our buddies S4$ and Lyte Trippin' are merely sewing these two pieces together.

C'mon guys, release your propaganda piece already

 

[TheGrunion]

OK whatever you say.

You are going to swept up in the tidal wave Chip, and there won't be anything you can do to stop it.

Tidal wave? I don't think you have enough to dampen a sponge, boy.