[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[Regnad Kcin]

Skeptic4Sure:

For the ninth time:

The screen name you are presently using may be "Skeptic4Sure," but have you ever used the screen name "JohnDoeX" (not to be confused with "John Doe X"), "Killtown" or "Merc?"

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

You are wrong.

Deny it all you have to...if it makes you feel better.

I repeat: have you had any contact with Sgt. Lagasse? If so, does he claim to have seen, with his own eyes, flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

I repeat: Wait and see.

Interested parties await your response.

Lots of interested parties await our response.

Now, please answer: do you think Lloyde England, Mike Walters, and Stephen McGraw are telling the truth?

I have opinions,and those opinions are not important right now or really at all.

 

[TheGrunion]

Mark Roberts,

My personal opinion is not what is important here. It will be the facts and holes in stories that will allow the conspiracy to be revealed. People will be able to draw their own conclusions from the information.

As for your other question, you will just have to wait and see, now won't you?

And for the record, I hold mind control as a very, very, very improbable aspect of this operation.

This response is laughable.

As I type this there are a total of 5 members logged in on the LC boards.

So this is what a dying woo movement looks like.

 

[WildCat]

I have opinions,and those opinions are not important right now or really at all.

Unfortunately, opinions is all you have. The facts and evidence supports the accepted view of what happened quite nicely.

Oh yeah, you'll release your groundbreaking new evidence soon...

 

[Bell]

I have opinions,and those opinions are not important right now or really at all.

Agreed.

 

[The Almond]

Now, please answer: do you think Lloyde England, Mike Walters, and Stephen McGraw are telling the truth?

I have opinions,and those opinions are not important right now or really at all.

Actually, what you purport to have is evidence that establishes fact. In other words, you purport to know whether or not the people named by Gravy are lying or only telling half truths. You know this, and it is not a matter of opinion. Or do you have no evidence at all?

Do you think Lloyde England, Mike Walter and Stephen McGraw are telling the truth?

 

[Brainache]

I think it is safe to assume you won't get an answer Regnad.

I've been watching this thread all the way and I am deeply shocked that S4S and LT have the ability to type.

How can it be possible? They have a few witnesses five years after an event who say that a plane flew from a particular direction and they(S4S and LT) seem to think that means that the hundreds of witnesses and all of the physical evidence from five years ago is suddenly invalidated.

So if I could produce a video with some people saying that five years ago they saw a movie trilogy about a magic ring where all the Hobbits died and the Dark Lord conquered Middle Earth, does that mean that The Lord Of The Rings has suddenly ceased to be as it appears on DVD and as everyone else remembers it? Well it must because my witnesses are highly credible and their testimony is BULLETPROOF!!

 

[jaydeehess]

Since being banned at LC I don't know if Lyte Trip has yet released his stupendous, jaw-dropping new evidence yet.

Is S4S Lyte or his side kick wassisname, or is this jdx doing the same, "you guys will be eating your words when our new , awesome evidence gets released soon. Yep we're gonna do it. Just wait and see, here it comes , shortly. You'll be blown away. Gonna happen anytime now. You'll be eating your words.............. ad (almost) infinitum"?

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Right?

Just agree with me, or show me how it is still possible.

 

[Brainache]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Right?

Just agree with me, or show me how it is still possible.

If the plane you refer to is Flt 77 then if your witness says it was on the north of the citgo, it is the witness who is mistaken. The physical evidence is physical evidence and it was not staged.

You seem to overlook the impossibility of staging that physical evidence, why?

 

[chipmunk stew]

We'd like to see him [Lloyd England] try [to sue us].

If I were him, I would worry about other legal issues soon to come.

Holy f-in' cow...

We need to make sure all these witnesses they interviewed are aware of what scurrilous fantasies these b*stards are formulating about them. Maybe get them in touch with Val McClatchey.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

If the plane you refer to is Flt 77 then if your witness says it was on the north of the citgo, it is the witness who is mistaken.

Ahem...witnesses.

The physical evidence is physical evidence and it was not staged.

Why because you said so? Right, because physical evidence in a crime has never been staged before.

You seem to overlook the impossibility of staging that physical evidence, why?

Why is it impossible? Because you say it is impossible? The plane was on the North side of the gas station, the poles weren't hit by the plane and they weren't blown out. So the only other alternative is staging.

 

[Bell]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Right?

Just agree with me, or show me how it is still possible.

Or it means your witnesses are mistaken, right?

Right?

Just agree with us, or show us they are not mistaken... but the dozens of others are (or are 'in on it' or whatever).

 

[gumboot]

So the plane being on the North side of the Citgo would mean the poles were staged and the plane did not hit the Pentagon right?

Once again we hit your cognative processing limit.

There is no logical procession from "the plane passed on the north of CITGO" and "the plane did not hit The Pentagon".

-Gumboot

 

[Folly]

Since being banned at LC I don't know if Lyte Trip has yet released his stupendous, jaw-dropping new evidence yet.

Is S4S Lyte or his side kick wassisname, or is this jdx doing the same, "you guys will be eating your words when our new , awesome evidence gets released soon. Yep we're gonna do it. Just wait and see, here it comes , shortly. You'll be blown away. Gonna happen anytime now. You'll be eating your words.............. ad (almost) infinitum"?

I'm totally curious too. I'd really like to know. Does their "evidence" actually exist, even if it's ridiculously farcical and fake and/or totally misinterpreted, or is this just some stupid game? It seems like there would have to be something being ponied up as physical evidence, because they both keep drawing a line for the "real" path of the plane. I mean, it can't just be eyewitness accounts, because a person standing on the ground isn't going to pin overhead location and heading down to anything other than a very broad smear. Although I suppose it would still be a grand ending if they turn out to be just that deranged.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Holy f-in' cow...

We need to make sure all these witnesses they interviewed are aware of what scurrilous fantasies these b*stards are formulating about them. Maybe get them in touch with Val McClatchey.

Please do. Let's see how far you get.

Believe me when I speak for the "Elite Pentagon Research Team" and say we're not worried or guilty of anything.

But I find your tactics pretty inane, do you really think we would put ourselves at risk in accusing anybody of anything.

We know that is this your last resort, fellas...so bring it on.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Once again we hit your cognative processing limit.

There is no logical procession from "the plane passed on the north of CITGO" and "the plane did not hit The Pentagon".

-Gumboot

Really, please do elaborate Gumboot.

Explain how the plane passing on the North side of the Citgo is going to impact the poles and the building in the same way to cause the damage we saw on 9/11.

 

[WildCat]

What "legal issues" will those be S4S? You wouldn't be making yet another completely unsubstantiated claim, would you?

Reposting for S4S...

 

[TheGrunion]

Please do. Let's see how far you get.

Believe me when I speak for the "Elite Pentagon Research Team" and say we're not worried or guilty of anything.

But I find your tactics pretty inane, do you really think we would put ourselves at risk in accusing anybody of anything.

We know that is this your last resort, fellas...so bring it on.

There is nothing to bring on until you get around to releasing the drivel that you are working on.

It appears that you are the one without any ammo.

 

[chipmunk stew]

First tell me when you find an outright accusation, and not some random opinion or brainstorming by an anonymous guy on the internet...then we can talk.

You simply don't see things when you don't want to.

This is an outright accusation by Lyte Trip, aka Craig, not an anonymous guy on the internet:

"Clearly Lloyd is lying or else the laws of physcis were violated

the only logical conclusion is that his account has been totally fabricated and staged.

Lloyd has somehow been compromised by the perpetrators."

There is no equivocation in these statements. They are outright accusations.