[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[stateofgrace]

Will you at least tell us how to make the cheese omelet now? Because if I had some cheese, I could make one, if I had some eggs.

Well first you have to check the room is completely clear of any listening devices and check your phone is not being tapped. Then open the fridge door very carefully ensuring there not any hidden explosive devices that can armed and set off.

Fully scan your cheese for listening bugs and grate it using a plastic grater if possible (It is easy to plant listen devices in metal one). Scan each egg, thoroughly, X-ray them if possible and crack them again very carefully because they may be rigged with explosive devices.

Once you are certain your life is not in danger and you are certain you are not being tracked put on the gas ring (mark 6).............hey what am I saying? I am giving the game away.

You will just have to be patient and bare with me, Oh my I hear the voices again.

 

[Horatius]

check your phone is not being tapped.

Well, damn, that leaves me out. Damn phone cops!

Once you are certain your life is not in danger and you are certain you are not being tracked put on the gas ring (mark 6).............hey what am I saying? I am giving the game away.

You will just have to be patient and bare with me, Oh my I hear the voices again.

Are the voices telling you to add garlic? Because I have some, if they are!

 

[tsig]

Got your attention. But then I guess you don't get many women talking to you....

I think you got that exacly right.

 

[tsig]

Since they plan on going to youtube and making DVD's it's clear their audience is fellow tin hatters and is not any real attempt to bring justice. It's also clear what they have could not stand the scrutiny of a detailed legal analysis.

I believe their goal is be like Dylan, not the truth.

Dylan has set the standard, now they all want part of the gold, that's why LC went down the tube.

 

[tsig]

Actually I can see the value of presenting such earth shattering evidence to the entire planet on youtube. I have credible evidence that youtube is an actually a front for the worlds intelligence community. They gather there and swap highly secretive and sensitive information, all encoded in youtube videos. So it makes sense that this information will go straight to the people who need to know and the NWO will be stopped in it tracks.

The credible evidence I have, I of course not release because I need to work it a bit but I am doing so .Expect within the next couple of months a youtube video called `How to make a great cheese omelet`. Here it will be fully explained.

Deny the cheese and the egg. then you will have a true omlet.

 

[Earl The Tall]

I already removed the owl image in another post. If you post it again, you will be suspended.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

The pic was removed, but I saw it qutoed and can I say you sir are a sick, sick person S4S.

 

[T.A.M.]

My suspicion is they have somehow misintepreted the FDR information, combined with witness testimony, and are likely creating a video that is part presentation, part simulation, showing their alleged "true path" of flight 77.

We will see.

TAM

 

[Anti-sophist]

My suspicion is they have somehow misintepreted the FDR information, combined with witness testimony, and are likely creating a video that is part presentation, part simulation, showing their alleged "true path" of flight 77.

We will see.

TAM

That's going to be hard, to be honest. The FDR's heading data is quite clear, and once corrected for magnetic/true north, it lines up almost perfectly.

More then likely, they will focus on the animation which appears to have not made that correction.

That is a double win for them because it shows that either the NTSB screwed up, or it shows an anomaly. Or both.

 

[LashL]

How's about you just present your information instead of rambling on for days?

Indeed. But it hasn't been just days, these two have been promising to present their earth shattering evidence since August, and it's now the end of November and they've presented nothing.

If I had proof of a conspiracy like you guys claim, I wouldn't be arguing with a bunch of goobers on an internet forum. I'd be trying to get it to someone in authority who could prosecute those responsible.

Of course. As would anyone whose goals were legitimate and honest. And as would any reasonable and rational researcher. (Clearly, the words legitimate and honest do not apply to the troofers spewing this nonsense, nor do the terms reasonable, rational, or researcher apply to these particular individuals.)

Posting repeatedly "I've got evidence, you'll see" surely doesn't lend any credibility to your cause.

It certainly does not. But these individuals never had any credibility in the first place. They are obviously full of crap and have no legitimate evidence to substantiate their bogus claims. Nothing new about that among troofers.

<snip>Put up or shut up.

Indeed. They won't, though. They simply do not have the goods, and they know it. Thus they are playing games online instead of actually pursuing their alleged evidence and instead of working on presenting it to the appropriate parties in order to bring the alleged perpetrators to justice. Nah, they'd rather hang out online 12 hours a day posting inane BS.

I don't expect you to do either. You've nothing to put up, and your ego won't let you shut up.

Well said.

I predict, however, that they will slink off into oblivion with their tails between their legs and their egos less than intact, shortly after they eventually present their alleged "evidence" (if they ever do) as it will be quickly, roundly and soundly debunked, (the latter being a foregone conclusion in light of their lame presentation to date of non-existent evidence, their inability to even remotely address real evidence, their inability to provide any actual evidence, and their inability to refute actual facts and evidence).

 

[maccy]

I predict, however, that they will slink off into oblivion with their tails between their legs and their egos less than intact, shortly after they eventually present their alleged "evidence" (if they ever do) as it will be quickly, roundly and soundly debunked, (the latter being a foregone conclusion in light of their lame presentation to date of non-existent evidence, their inability to even remotely address real evidence, their inability to provide any actual evidence, and their inability to refute actual facts and evidence).

I agree. And they won't just be debunked here, either. I'm sure Russell Pickering will do a very thorough job on the LC boards (the Pentagon is one area he does know very well).

They've had the same type of threads running over at loose change for a while now and are getting a very similar response there to the one they're getting here.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=636
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=604
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=78
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=651
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=410

 

[W6102LA]

heh heh, a troofer over at LC claimed he saw a preview of LC:FC and that there would be "hard evidence" in it regarding F77 and the poles

 

[Roger_Harris]

More then likely, they will focus on the animation which appears to have not made that correction.

Actually, it appears that the "correction" in the animation was made by turning the map in the wrong direction. The 70° magnetic heading minus the 10.5° adjustment to true should be 59.5°, but the animation puts the plane on a heading of about 80° true.

 

[gumboot]

heh heh, a troofer over at LC claimed he saw a preview of LC:FC and that there would be "hard evidence" in it regarding F77 and the poles

Is hard evidence like a hard clue?

-Gumboot

 

[T.A.M.]

hard evidence...like the type given by a bunch of "Pilots" who are too busy online at their website to actually be flying???

TAM

 

[Anti-sophist]

Actually, it appears that the "correction" in the animation was made by turning the map in the wrong direction. The 70° magnetic heading minus the 10.5° adjustment to true should be 59.5°, but the animation puts the plane on a heading of about 80° true.

Hmmm. Interesting.

 

[Piggy]

heh heh, a troofer over at LC claimed he saw a preview of LC:FC and that there would be "hard evidence" in it regarding F77 and the poles

Well, if these fellows think that "hard evidence" can be found on a DVD like that, then they obviously have no idea what hard evidence actually is.

 

[uruk]

I've been a way. Has lyte trip answered these questions or is he still putting the finnishing touches on the techno sound track to his youtube expose'?

Originally Posted by Lyte Trip
I told you what I will prove.

That the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

That is enough to show that 9/11 was an inside job.

Either you demonstrate how this is incorrect or you ultimately lose this debate.

If the plane went to the north of the Citgo why did the conspirators place the lamp post on the wrong side?
Did they plant the damage before the plane hit or after?

If they planted it after the crash why did they place it on the wrong side?

If they planted it before the impact why are there no accounts of people crawling all over the highway removing lamposts and placing broken lamp post all over the place?
And how about the taxi impaled by the lamp post. did they smash it through the winshield on site? or did they drive it to the site with the lamp post already set? Wouldn't somebody have noticed a taxi driving along the highway with a lamp post sticking out the windshield?

Why does the impact damage to the Pentagon correspond to an airplane coming in from an angle that is to the south of the citgo?
Where is the impact damage from the airplane coming in from north of the Citgo?
Are there any witnesses who claim that they saw workers bringing down and planting lamp posts?

 

[uruk]

Guys, judging from S4S reparte', he/she seems to be about 17 or 18 years old.

 

[uk_dave]

I've been a way. Has lyte trip answered these questions or is he still putting the finnishing touches on the techno sound track to his youtube expose'?

You get two guesses, and the first one doesn't count.

 

[uruk]

Is hard evidence like a hard clue?

-Gumboot

Just as long as it ain't "raw".