[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[WildCat]

No, we are very bright individuals if you haven't figured it out yet.

Ladies and gentleman, I present the smartest troofers in existence!

 

[ihaunter]

Honestly, I was trying to give them the benefit of the doubt. I was trying to thinkof what they could have that would make them so confident, besides an overdeveloped ego. I mean, I've seen CTists go gaga over the smallest stuff, like video compression artifacts, but these guys seemed even more confident. And considering that they've been beaten over the head with the fact that a few eyewitness testimonies from five years after the fact are not going to be enough, maybe they had something more.
That's when I rembered this. That was the only thing I could think of that could possibly "support" their theory, if we were to apply CT logic.
But now, they say that they don't have video from 9/11 for proof. Which returns to the question, what could they possibly have? Looks like we're back to the overdeveloped ego. (unless they lied about the video, always a possibility)

I've got to stop giving CTists the benefit of the doubt. They always disappoint me.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Reported.

Skeptic4Sure:

For the fifth time, the screen name you are presently using may be "Skeptic4Sure," but have you ever used the screen name "JohnDoeX" (not to be confused with "John Doe X"), "Killtown" or "Merc?"

 

[Piggy]

And maybe you're just a blowhard with nothing to say.

Are you going to apologize to us when this information is presented?

Nothing to say about what?

You've presented zip.

There will be no valid evidence presented because you have none, so I'm not going to have to worry myself about any apologies.

If you had anything, it would be out, and you wouldn't be trafficking it on DVDs and YouTube.

You guys are a bunch of kids with pop guns accusing everyone else of being insane for not being afraid of you.

 

[Piggy]

Ok so, you're just playing catch-up. Making sure you respond to every post that has already been addressed. You should have been here a few days ago.

Playing catch-up with what?

You have nothing, and you've presented nothing new in this entire thread.

Every point you've made has been debunked, leaving you with this playground taunt of "You'll see!" and asking people if they plan to apologize when you dazzle us all with your brilliance.

You have nothing.

 

[T.A.M.]

S4S:

You have reported several people for words such as "Creep" and "F*****rs", yet as I have gone through your posts you have called people:

(1) MOLESTRIN
(2) BASKET CASE
(3) MANIAC
(4) PIGLET

and others. You have mocked, purposely posting inflamatory remarks. If I were to report each an every one of your violations in this thread alone you would be banned....so knock off with the BS.

Put up or shut up.

TAM

 

[apathoid]

S4S:

You have reported several people for words such as "Creep" and "F*****rs", yet as I have gone through your posts you have called people:

(1) MOLESTRIN
(2) BASKET CASE
(3) MANIAC
(4) PIGLET

TAM

Dont forget CRAPATHOID

 

[gumboot]

So has he presented his amazing evidence yet?

-Gumboot

 

[stateofgrace]

So has he presented his amazing evidence yet?

-Gumboot

Not yet.

He has called everybody lots and lots of names and declared himself a winner. He has assured us all we will be humbled by it and will have to apologies like mad for disbelieving him.

But actual evidence,no,not yet.

 

[maccy]

So has he presented his amazing evidence yet?

-Gumboot

No.

But they're saying it should all be over by Christmas.

When will this proof be presented and to whom? To this forum? To the government of the United States? I'm curious to know. Thanks.

Soon, presumably before the new year and it will be presented to the world.

So within the next six weeks? How will it be presented to the world?

Youtube, DVD, etc.

 

[gumboot]

No.

But they're saying it should all be over by Christmas.

YouTube?

He has irrefutable evidence that the US Government staged 9/11 and killed 3,000 of their own citizens, and they intend to post it on YOUTUBE???



words fail me

-Gumboot

 

[Bell]

So has he presented his amazing evidence yet?

-Gumboot

S4B aka JDX and Little Trifle are still playing games at the victims expense.

 

[uk_dave]

Why not youtube?

All kinds of crap gets posted on youtube.....

 

[DavidJames]

Since they plan on going to youtube and making DVD's it's clear their audience is fellow tin hatters and is not any real attempt to bring justice. It's also clear what they have could not stand the scrutiny of a detailed legal analysis.

I believe their goal is be like Dylan, not the truth.

 

[Horatius]

And maybe you're just a blowhard with nothing to say.

Are you going to apologize to us when this information is presented?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say, No, we're not going to apologize. Because even if you do have some earth-shatering evidence that could convince all of us that your "north of the Citgo" line is accurate, that doesn't excuse the childish games, name calling and pointless delays that you've engaged in. In fact, if you did have such evidence, that fact would make all your game-playing BS all that much worse.

In your own mind, you're using evidence of horrific crimes to score points on the Internet against a bunch of mean old skeptics. That's just evil, and such people don't deserve an apology.

But of course, you don't have any such earth-shattering evidence, so the whole question is as much a hypothetical piece of crap as the first question in this thread.

 

[maccy]

YouTube?

He has irrefutable evidence that the US Government staged 9/11 and killed 3,000 of their own citizens, and they intend to post it on YOUTUBE???



words fail me

-Gumboot

I've stopped arguing with them, but I'll repeat what I said several pages back:

One day, when you've grown up, you're going to be very embarrassed by the way you've behaved over the past few months.

I'll say it again: physical evidence trumps witness testimony. Problems with the reliability of witness testimony are well documented.

Unless you have a plausible hypothesis that accounts for an inside job, with supporting evidence, you have not proved an inside job.

This is before I looked at Lyte Trip's myspace page and discovered that he is 30 years old.

 

[maccy]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say, No, we're not going to apologize. Because even if you do have some earth-shatering evidence that could convince all of us that your "north of the Citgo" line is accurate, that doesn't excuse the childish games, name calling and pointless delays that you've engaged in. In fact, if you did have such evidence, that fact would make all your game-playing BS all that much worse.

In your own mind, you're using evidence of horrific crimes to score points on the Internet against a bunch of mean old skeptics. That's just evil, and such people don't deserve an apology.

But of course, you don't have any such earth-shattering evidence, so the whole question is as much a hypothetical piece of crap as the first question in this thread.

Seconded.

 

[Alt+F4]

But of course, you don't have any such earth-shattering evidence, so the whole question is as much a hypothetical piece of crap as the first question in this thread.

Sadly though, you don't need earth-shattering evidence to separate folks from their money through the sale of a DVD.

Since I'm of the opinion that the Pentagon wasn't the terrorist's destination (and no one can prove it was), this Citgo crap means nothing.

 

[stateofgrace]

Why not youtube?

All kinds of crap gets posted on youtube.....

Actually I can see the value of presenting such earth shattering evidence to the entire planet on youtube. I have credible evidence that youtube is an actually a front for the worlds intelligence community. They gather there and swap highly secretive and sensitive information, all encoded in youtube videos. So it makes sense that this information will go straight to the people who need to know and the NWO will be stopped in it tracks.

The credible evidence I have, I of course not release because I need to work it a bit but I am doing so .Expect within the next couple of months a youtube video called `How to make a great cheese omelet`. Here it will be fully explained.

 

[Horatius]

The credible evidence I have, I of course not release because I need to work it a bit but I am doing so .Expect within the next couple of months a youtube video called `How to make a great cheese omelet`. Here[/FONT] it will be fully explained.

Will you at least tell us how to make the cheese omelet now? Because if I had some cheese, I could make one, if I had some eggs.