[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

You got me wrong! Anything with the word "world" is of course always legitimate. :D
Of course it is, and Bat Boy is on our side!

Bat%20Boy%20Saves%20the%20day.JPG
 
God help us if Truthseeker1234 gets a subscription to WeeklyWorldNews.:D
I can just imagine the inquiries.
[TS1234]
But, but, but the gumberement can cross breed human DNA with that of other mammals. Its a proven fact(inserts link to another supermarket tabloid). I would love to see scientific evidence debunking this, then I will be able to sleep at night.
[/TS1234]
 
Which ones?

Witnesses on the bridge? Well, I see you've already attempted (rather unsuccessfully) to trash the cab driver, Lloyd England, over on the LC board. I might have missed it, but did you also try to trash Stephen McGraw, who was next to England's cab when it got hit? How about Mark Bright, Afework Hagos, D.S. Khavkin, Stephen McGraw, Mary Ann Owens, Wanda Ramey, Steve Riskus, Noel Sepulveda, Mike Walter, and Rodney Washington? Those are the names I found on just one site who specifically said they saw the plane hit the light posts.
 
Whew, thats a relief. But in the future, we have to have better contingency plans in case anyone else gets to our coached witnesses. We cant expect them to remember everything we told them to say. Perhaps weekly refresher training? I mean, what if those meddling kids actually were able to upload those videos(in triplicate, no less) to Google Video?? Yeah, thats what I thought - we'd be in a world of hurt.

What I don't understand is why we didn't just use the mass hypnosis again. But no one ever listens to me.
 
Eventually there will be plenty evidence for everyone.

And for only 29,95$ But that's a small price to pay for every deacent person needs to help spreading this important trooth. This is not the time to be stingy. The future depends on it so everyone should support the trooth by buying DVDs or donating. Together we can beat this new world order!
 
S4S, if you can prove that flight 77 took the left path, I will personally join your cause, join Pilots4Truth, quit my job and start wearing goofy t-shirts and hanging out in Manhattan with a funny hat, bring along my banjo and sing the MIHOP/LIHOP song. I promise I will. I'll even give JDX a back rub.

So let's see your proof.
 
Sadly...this seems to esplain it all!

From LC
(Forester @ Nov 18 2006, 04:50 AM)
ok...but if the flight path was incorrect for those light poles...why didnt the govt stage lightpoles at the true path? it just doesnt make logical sense. /Forest@LC

Begin
Lyte in the trippy loafers, or S4S, take your pick
There were many mistakes during the 9/11 operation.

It was just too complex to get perfect.

The plane was just a few coordinates off what it was supposed to be but that is enough to blow their entire story.

They have been busted.

Can't wait for the DVD...NOT!
 
It's simple. If the Citgo witness' account could be corroborated, would the implications register with any of you?

The straight answer is that one should evaluate the witness testimony against the physical evidence, evaluate it agianst other witness testimony and check it for internal consistency. If you have two persons or groups of persons giving mutually exclusive testimony all you can deduce from that fact is that one - or both - version of events is wrong.
 
My Goodness, Toto! People sure do come and go in a hurry around here!

I blink and you guys have another plaything! I read through the thread and find out he's done disappeared. Did his mommy call for bedtime? Or is he back at LC getting more hints to give us.

The guy at Citgo - was he Pete Townsend?

I was born with a plastic spoon in my mouth
The north side of my town faced east, and the east was facing south
 
Let me ask you this,

Would you believe "witness testimony" provided indirectly from 3 turds who are more interested in fame and fortune than any other element. I suspect all and any evidence from them. Even if they provided 10 "witnesses", I would want to see full unedited versions of the interviews and signed testimonies. Any less I would suspect...EOS.

TAM
 
(tinfoil hat on)

I'm sorry but I personally will not believe any testimony contrary to the bulk of eyewitness testimony and physical evidence unless it is backed up with verifiable photographs/video of the plane passing along the route claimed by the minority witnesses.

And trust me..... I will not be alone in this. :stone020:
 
Gravy said...
And be sure you're accounting for magnetic deviation

Once again their whole "smoking gun", is ignorance gone wild. Typical!
Dying to see this get torn apart! *licks chops*
Please do it soon, I've gotta hit the road again on wed!
 
I will die of old age before any of you lunatics prove a 9/11 conspiracy.

As will anyone not yet born for all eternity.

You've got nothing, you will never have anything.

It's so nice to see how frustration can bring out the best in people.

Look when you're done calling people names give me a ring.

BTW, who are the lunatics, the people obsessed with 9/11? Or the people obsessed with the people who are obsessed with 9/11?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom