[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

Skeptic4Sure said:
A simple question I am trying to get answered by all you well researched and all knowing skeptics. The issue now seems to be that if the plane was on the left side, Arlington Cemetery side of the gas station, that everything changes. Which, as anyone who reads the ASCE report or seen the which light poles were knocked down, would know it poses a MAJOR problem for the official story.
Click to expand...
What were the light poles knocked down by? What were they knocked down by in the official story, what were they knocked down by in your alternative? What corroborating evidence can you show for the alternative?

It's pretty simple, either right or left... North or South. If it's true, then EVERYTHING changes.
Click to expand...

Actually, it doesn't. Your definition of corroborating evidence is clearly different from ours. The difference between one eyewittness account and another does not provide evidence which corroborates the disappearance of the airplane, crew and passengers of flight 77.
 
Skeptic I can only assume you are on something or drunk, please answer the question.

What happened to Flight 77?
 
Skeptic4Sure said:
I believe you guys are going to be unpleasantly suprised and have a hard road of realization coming.
Click to expand...
I will die of old age before any of you lunatics prove a 9/11 conspiracy.

As will anyone not yet born for all eternity.

You've got nothing, you will never have anything.
 
The Path of destrction through the Pentagon is pretty absolute regardless of what you want to argue hit the pentagon. Corraborated by the destruction of the light poles, Any witness who wants to describe the path leading up to the Pentagon as something different is simply wrong. I think it's safe to assume we're not really scared of what you might bring to the table.
 
S4S, how many people have AA77 on the wrong side of the Citgo station?
1, 2, 4... 35??

Why are these people right and the overwhelming majority of witnesses wrong?

Did these people actually report seeing the impact?

Did they report a flyover?

I actually cant wait to see the interviews of these people. I'm sure they will be heavily cut, with the leading questions and badgering left on the cutting room floor....along with the testimony of witnessing the impact itself.
 
Skeptic4Sure said:
Yes, there is now. And there will be more to come, hence the word "eventually".
Click to expand...

Why is it the CTists always engage in this "proof tease"?

If you have enough evidence to make your little cartoon, you have enough to go public. Put up or shut up.

I believe you guys are going to be unpleasantly suprised and have a hard road of realization coming.
Click to expand...

If you really believe that, then show us. You'll get all sorts of CT cred for either converting us all, or showing us to be the close-minded shills you've always thought we were. Win-win, that's called.

Put up.
 
Skeptic4Sure said:
Do you guys agree?
Click to expand...

Absolutely not. I'm not willing to discredit the entirety of one set of evidence on the basis of one eye-wittness claim. In order for me to completely disregard the official story, I would require a body of evidence equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. I would also require a complete, compelling theory which accounts for more of the observations made than the official one does including, but not limited to:
The disappearance of flight 77
The absence of ordinance used (assuming the alternative missle theory)
The presence of the black box from flight 77

Thus far, I haven't seen a single theory which provides that. Until I do, I'm not discrediting the original theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom