[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[WildCat]

Because I don't have the technical expertise nor the equipment to compile the information appropriately.

No doubt about that.

 

[Gravy]

Oh Gravy,

Is this how you do you everything?

Yes, I do try to examine the facts, even when people like you and Lyte are afraid to present them.

Skeptic, yesterday you avoided posting in the thread I started for you because you said you were too busy. Since you now have the time, I ask that you now present your case against me. You said you knew exactly what you were going to say. So say it. Or are you "sitting on" that for national security reasons?

Your mother must be proud.

My mother is dead, so she won't be weighing in on your comments.

You actually hunted down Craig's myspace page and are attempting to smear his name.

Hunted down? It's called "five seconds on google." They do the hunting. "Smear his name?" No, I showed his work, which he claims to be proud of.

Lyte refused to tell me if he had interviewed any of the people who I listed as mentioning the light poles. Turns out he had talked to some of those people. And he thinks they're lying or under the influence of mind-control. He says he wouldn't look at physical evidence if given the chance. He lies about the size of the hole made by AA77.

Lyte certainly doesn't need me to smear his name. He's doing a great job of that himself, and he's proud of it.

You are making powerful enemies my celebrity look-alike friend.

That's my first-ever double dog laugh. Still sleeping with a night lyte, Skeptic?

Do you think that is very nice, to take someone's personal information that doesn't have anything to with the discussion at hand and make an issue out of it?

You mean like Lyte does with Lloyd England, Stephen McGraw, and Mike Walter? Lyte chose to present his credentials for all to see. He didn't have to put those idiotic things on his MySpace page.

...or did he?

You won't be able to fake your way through this one, with your OPINION and "seemingly" detailed post.

I don't need to. I just use your words.

Maybe we should do a little investigation on Mark Roberts. Maybe we should insinuate things about you on the internet.

How would you like that?

You haven't been paying attention. Morons have been doing that since April. Since your investigative skills need some work, I'll make it easy for you ahd let you know when I have a crackpot MySpace page up, 'kay?

Chemtrails!

 

[TheGrunion]

Im think im beginning to understand the CT process. Im going to plant a bombshell. I think the poles were exploded with thermite.

This makes a great deal more sense than Jerc's working theory that he posted on the LC boards before they blew up. I saved it for posterity.

Vans At The Pentagon, What were they doing on Rt 27? This photo taken at approximately 9:41
Light Pole planters anyone?

How do you propose that a van would be used to plant lightpoles?

Load said light poles, drive onto closed Rt 27, unload said light poles.
If pole sticks out back, wrap with blanket.

 

[Gravy]

Nope.

It's undamaged.

That is a reflection.

Look at the flash from the camera and the capitol cab sign in the reflection.

You can see the cab sign in this reflection too. No damage.

Said the "investigator" who, if given the chance, would NOT look at the physical evidence he's talking about. Extraordinary.

Lyte, are you going to retract what you said about those three witnesses on your MySpace page? Shall I talk to them and see what they think?

Lyte, are you going to correct your egregious error about the "13-foot wide" hole in the Pentagon? If not, please explain why. We all want to know how an elite researcher operates.

 

[Horatius]

He didn't have to put those idiotic things on his MySpace page.

...or did he?

It's the little touches that show professionalism at work.

 

[uk_dave]

It's the little touches that show professionalism at work.

Hey! It's easy when you have the entire NSA working on your posts.

The rest of us have to make do with elves.

Lousy NWO..... never pay on time... no bloody holidays..........

 

[Gravy]

Wow, you really have no idea who you're messing with or what we have done.

Yes we do.

 

[Gravy]

DUDE!!!!!

THANK YOU!!!

I knew I had heard that one wing hit the ground. I need to look into that and get some more info on it. Now I have a source to start looking at (other than just a half-rememered TV documentary)!

AHA!!!

The report is at http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

Section 3.7, end of page 18/top of page 19:

"After the plane had travelled approximately another 75 ft, the left engine struvk the ground at nearly the same instant that the nose of the aircraft struck the west wall of the Pentagon (figure 3.15)."

The quote I remembered was about finding wing debris buried in the ground, though. Not quite the same, but I feel a bit less as if I was Loosing my mind

This may also be helpful. I linked to it in a prior post.

Frank Probst, an employee of the Pentagon Renovation Program Office, was outside the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001. In an interview with the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Probst gave his own eyewitness account. He had been watching live television coverage of the second plane hitting the World Trade Center tower in one of the construction site trailers.


Around 9:30 a.m., Probst left the trailer and (as paraphrased in an ASCE report) "began walking to the Modular Office Compound, located beyond the extreme north end of the Pentagon" for a 10 o'clock meeting. Approaching the heliport, he looked over and saw "a plane flying low over the Annex and heading right for him." Understandably, Probst "hit the ground and observed the right wing tip pass through the portable 750 kW generator" that provided backup power to a portion of the Pentagon. He saw the right engine take out "the chain-link fence and posts surrounding the generator." The left engine, he said, "struck an external steam vault before the fuselage entered the building."


Probst described to the ASCE how, "as the fireball from the crash moved toward him," he ran toward the South Parking Lot. He said that he fell down twice, and while running, "fine pieces of wing debris floated down about him." He only saw "fire and smoke within the building at the point of impact."



http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2004/08-23-2004/facts.htm

This account is verified by Don Mason, who saw the plane approaching Probst. Of course, any elite Pentagon researcher knows that these men are liars.

Right, Skeptic4Sure? Right, Lyte?

 

[Gravy]

This makes a great deal more sense than Jerc's working theory that he posted on the LC boards before they blew up. I saved it for posterity.

Originally Posted by Grunion Sep 12 2006, 03:15 PM

How do you propose that a van would be used to plant lightpoles?

Originally Posted by Merc Sep 12 2006, 5:57 PM

Load said light poles, drive onto closed Rt 27, unload said light poles.
If pole sticks out back, wrap with blanket.

Oh, me. Oh, my.

"Anybody seen my 30-foot blanket around here?"
"What do you need such a big blankie for?"
"Boss says I gotta wrap up these poles so people don't know what they is."
"Then what're you gonna do with them?"
"Gonna install them on the highway."
"Well, you're not gonna install them with the blanket on, are you?"
"Anybody seen my 30-foot blanket around here?"

 

[Lyte Trip]

Gravy,
I haven't updated that myspace page in months. I will correct it to 18 feet.

I have not accused Mike Walter, Father McGraw, or Lloyd of anything specific but yes I have considered the possibility that they are exaggerating, deducing, or even lying.

If 9/11 was an inside job as we are set to prove.....some witnesses had to be lying.

Everyone will be in a position very soon to make this determination on their own.

You will be forced to admit 9/11 was an inside job or call witnesses liars.

 

[Bell]

You will be forced to admit 9/11 was an inside job or call witnesses liars.

We will be forced to nothing.
And how about witnesses making mistakes in recalling events that happened 5 years ago?

 

[Dog Town]

LyteBright said...

some witnesses had to be lying.

Yeah, like a couple hundred! Pffftt! I call...what ya got? Nuthen? Color me shocked!

 

[Garb]

Gravy,
I haven't updated that myspace page in months. I will correct it to 18 feet.

I have not accused Mike Walter, Father McGraw, or Lloyd of anything specific but yes I have considered the possibility that they are exaggerating, deducing, or even lying.

If 9/11 was an inside job as we are set to prove.....some witnesses had to be lying.

Everyone will be in a position very soon to make this determination on their own.

You will be forced to admit 9/11 was an inside job or call witnesses liars.

Oh my God give us the evidence!!!

 

[Bell]

Oh my God give us the evidence!!!

No no no!! It's all a game to them. A big joke, over the victims backs.

 

[Lyte Trip]

LyteBright said...

Yeah, like a couple hundred! Pffftt! I call...what ya got? Nuthen? Color me shocked!

Incorrect.

You have zero that place the plane south of the citgo.

 

[Bell]

Incorrect.

You have zero that place the plane south of the citgo.

What happened to the passengers, crew and plane of AA77?
What knocked down the lightpoles?

 

[hellaeon]

I have not accused Mike Walter, Father McGraw, or Lloyd of anything specific but yes I have considered the possibility that they are exaggerating, deducing, or even lying.

If 9/11 was an inside job as we are set to prove.....some witnesses had to be lying.

Everyone will be in a position very soon to make this determination on their own.

You will be forced to admit 9/11 was an inside job or call witnesses liars.

You have assumed those guys to be telling lies as it does not fit with your conclusion. You have a conclusion and are purposefully removing anything that contradicts it. Your doing nothing that a real researcher or investigator would do. Your doing your 'experiments' and 'research' completely backwards. Please stay away from Australia. Keep on smoking hippies. I bet your band is crap.

 

[Lyte Trip]

We will be forced to nothing.
And how about witnesses making mistakes in recalling events that happened 5 years ago?

I promise that you will not be able to legitimately use that excuse as an out.

 

[Garb]

No no no!! It's all a game to them. A big joke, over the victims backs.

...


F*** that.

 

[Bell]

I promise that you will not be able to legitimately use that excuse as an out.

Promise schmomise.