[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[Bell]

I wonder if his "new witnesses" actually saw what they saw, or just deducted it.

I wonder if his "new witnesses" actually said anything to support his theories, or if he's just going to quotemine and strategically misunderstand them.

JDX: "Goodday sir."
Man: "Goodday sir."
JDX: "You told me you were near the Pentagon on 9/11?"
Man: "That is quite right."
JDX: "Well sir, did you then see AA77 hit the Pentagon?"
Man: "No sir, I didn't."
JDX: "Oh? And did you atleast see AA77 fly by?"
Man: "No sir, I didn't see the plane at all."

*JDX runs off to the JREF forum and claims undebunkable evidence*

 

[T.A.M.]

Prediction:

The "Pilots" site will announce, in conjunction with LC, probably through LC:FC, that (1) several witnesses have testified that the "plane" flight path was from the north side, and (2) A Professional Pilots group has done research, involving the alleged FDR data, which proves conclusively that the flight path was from the north side, not the south side, as is the case with the "official story".

BIG FREAKING WHOOP!!!!

If true (highly unlikely) it only means John is wearing red socks instead of green ones...but it is still John.

TAM

 

[Trifikas]

So the whole conspiracy theory now hangs upon the credibility of a witness or witnesses who will state categorically that the plane passed the north side of citgo, yes?

My guess: Witnesses will state that the plane passed on the Left side of the Citgo, and the whole thing is a misunderstanding that if they were between the pentagon and the Citgo, Looking back at the Citgo, the plane WOULD have passed on the left...

 

[progressquest]

Science damn it! I was hoping that I would see something of substance when I opened this thread. All I have seen so far is a claim to evidence (never actually presented) followed by a bunch of flames.


Hope to see some evidence soon!

 

[Bell]

Hope to see some evidence soon!

Your name will fail you in this case...

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

JDX: "Goodday sir."
Man: "Goodday sir."
JDX: "You told me you were near the Pentagon on 9/11?"
Man: "That is quite right."
JDX: "Well sir, did you then see AA77 hit the Pentagon?"
Man: "No sir, I didn't."
JDX: "Oh? And did you atleast see AA77 fly by?"
Man: "No sir, I didn't see the plane at all."

*JDX runs off to the JREF forum and claims undebunkable evidence*

Wrong. Wow. Really wrong.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

My guess: Witnesses will state that the plane passed on the Left side of the Citgo, and the whole thing is a misunderstanding that if they were between the pentagon and the Citgo, Looking back at the Citgo, the plane WOULD have passed on the left...

Definitely wrong.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Wrong. Wow. Really wrong.

Definitely wrong.

Prove it.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Skeptic4Sure:

Have you ever used either the screen name Killtown, JohnDoeX, or both?

 

[tsig]

Skeptic4Sure:

Have you ever used either the screen name Killtown, JohnDoeX, or both?

Verily, his name is Legion.

 

[Dog Town]

Definitely wrong.

You said you left! Would not come back with out your "smok'en gun".
You are a lier!

 

[The Almond]

I couldn't help but notice that most of this thread is rhetoric and name calling. Would someone mind telling me when something substantive happens?

 

[Bell]

So since this is becoming boring and unproductive, I guess I have my answers.

The only thing left to do is drop the bomb and watch all the little ants run and go crazy.

We'll have to wait for that. I guess this thread is going to be inactive until the evidence is presented.

Ta-ta, all.

Wrong. Wow. Really wrong.

..

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Ok, so then there is one thing I want to establish that we all learned as fact in this thread.

If the plane is on the North Side of the gas station, the plane DEFINITELY COULD NOT HAVE hit poles 1, 2, and 3. And it definitely couldn't have hit poles 4 and 5 due to the undamaged poles next to them.

If the plane is on the North side of the gas station, then the damage as detailed in the ASCE report was actually made by something other than this aircraft, due to the directional damage located in the Pentagon.

 

[Pardalis]

If this was ever proven to be true, not only does this not prove in any way that 9/11 was an inside job, but it leaves us with a supernatural mystery about flying lightpoles.

Do you get it?

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

If this was ever proven to be true, not only does this not prove in any way that 9/11 was an inside job, but it leaves us with a supernatural mystery about flying lightpoles.

Do you get it?

Yes, you keep repeating that...and maybe it will come true...in your mind.

Pardalis, I don't think you understand the gravity of the situation here.

YOU need to spend a little more "critical thinking time" on it.

 

[Dog Town]

Ok, so then there is one thing I want to establish that we all learned as fact in this thread.

The only fact learned here, is you have no facts!

 

[stateofgrace]

Ok, so then there is one thing I want to establish that we all learned as fact in this thread.

If the plane is on the North Side of the gas station, the plane DEFINITELY COULD NOT HAVE hit poles 1, 2, and 3. And it definitely couldn't have hit poles 4 and 5 due to the undamaged poles next to them.

http://pentagonresearch.com/images/020.jpg

If the plane is on the North side of the gas station, then the damage as detailed in the ASCE report was actually made by something other than this aircraft, due to the directional damage located in the Pentagon.

Facts do not start with IF, they start with F. please try again.

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

The only fact learned here, is you have no facts!

OK, Disfunctionoid.

So are you saying that those aren't facts?

 

[Bell]

Did AA77 hit the Pentagon, yes or no?