How much of an idiot do you think I am? When you look at the volume they are doing the overhead costs are minimal for this type of operation.
You're the one making idiotic comparisons, not me. Duplicaiton of CDs are just one aspect of a whole operation. You cannot take one aspect of an operation that encompasses websites, multimedia, seminars etc etc in multiple languages and dozens of countries and make judgements based on that. We've been through this before - you ignore office expenses, staffing, translaters, R&D, IT support, legal, accounting, travel etc etc etc etc etc.
Again, base manufacturing expenses is typically a minor part of the final price of ANY product.
I've asked before and you never answer - Why do you think these companies are so fantastically more efficient than other companies?
Also since I am in the software business I have a fairly good idea of the types of costs they are going to encounter creating these types of media.
So you're producing materials for 30+ countries in 20+ languages, having to sort through and edit hundreds of recordings a month, deal with thingsl ike Amway regulations, handle packaging etc etc etc .... you're doing all of these things and you honestly believe they cost nothing?
I don't think you're an idiot, but your providing some pretty solid evidence.
Also everyone needs to keep in mind that a lot of this stuff is just recordered from the conferences that everyone has already paid to attend (they do some original material as well of course).
Yes, conferences that can just as easily lose money.
Again, do you think everyone on this board an idiot? Because they are milking their downline to fatten their pockets. That's why! The tool pyramid is inverted. The guys at the bottom lose money on the tools and the guys at the top make the most per unit.
I provided the rebate scale, you even acknowledged it, now you completely ignore it! The "guys at the bottom" of the "tool pyramid" get the largest rebate, not the smallest. And how do they "lose" money? Any unsold stock goes to the companies bottom line, not theirs.
Or let me guess ... you're referring to the customers of the "tool" companies - the IBOs. Who are buying something they want, for a price cheaper than they can get it elsewhere.
Only in the bizarre world of the anti-amway zealot is buying something you want at a cheaper price than elsewhere called "losing money"
In your case it looks like most of the cash flows into Dornands pocket but I'm sure that the other big pins in his group has special participation deals. You posted a tools volume rebate schedule that only covers a portion of the profit margin.
It covers the profit margins of the marketing network of platinums and above, which is the only area any real potential conflict of interest is an issue. Profit for the company itself is entirely different, and as far as I'm concerned they can operate on the same basis as every other company in the world - to operate at the highest possible margins for the most profit.
In your business, do you everything for free or are you actually trying to make money?
Exactly. In other words just because some reads material it doesn't make it true. It could in fact be crap and you could simply be mistaken that it's good.
I find value in it. I get to decide that, not you.
Look, I have no problem with it. I don't think that everything that's unethical should be prima facie illegal.
You think a company producing materials and services and selling them for a profit is unethical? Why? Isn't that what you do?
I'm just trying to educate people so they can make their own decision.
Yup ... I'm sure they're all enormously shocked to learn that a company selling them stuff is making money doing so
seriously, what planet are you on? KarlMarxland?