• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Miss me? (smiles)

Sooo.. you're not even going to answer my perfectly reasonable question about how you can prove it in court? What sort of argument are you going to use which makes your claim irrefutable and which will see you triumph against the evil Randi?
 
Heck, I wonder what he thinks his legal basis is, let alone how he is going to prove his contention. Even if I could do something paranormal, Randi still has no legal obligation to test me, as far as I know.
 
"...curiosity is bidding me...". no its not. it's one of 'them.
Click to expand...

-- Starrman clutches head, screams 'GET THEM OUT' and runs out or his office into traffic --
 
roger said:
Heck, I wonder what he thinks his legal basis is, let alone how he is going to prove his contention. Even if I could do something paranormal, Randi still has no legal obligation to test me, as far as I know.
Click to expand...




Interesting.


This Foundation is guilty of "prejudice, of truth".

I've been prevented twice of even being able to take the test. You look in the archives at what they have tested...come on..what Iam saying isn't no crazier then any of those.....They know I am right.
Do you honestly think this foundation wants to give up its bank?
That would be the end of them and they know it. Dont be so nieve they dont want no one to win. (excuse spelling).

When majority believes, I win.

Regardless of what any of you say........I know you see them.
Do I believe you believe.........no, not all of you. Do I think some of you believe...yes, but would rather die then admit it.

My day in court will come.

smiles

Lyndale
 
TheBoyPaj said:
Sooo.. you're not even going to answer my perfectly reasonable question about how you can prove it in court? What sort of argument are you going to use which makes your claim irrefutable and which will see you triumph against the evil Randi?
Click to expand...



By both "live" and "record" moments.
I am convincing a jury of my peers, remember? Not the foundation.

If they had a lick of sense, they should'uv let me take the test, that way "it would'uv been their decision"

I wouldn't take their test now if they begged me.




Lyndale
 
But what exactly is your claim? That there are some dots which resemble a face? Even if twelve good men say "yeah, it looks like a face" that doesn't make it paranormal and won't win you a penny.

How are you going to convince them there is something odd going on?
 
this is...

...like a perfect record being recorded.

Just sitting here thinking.....lol.

Amazing how things turn out.

They tried to hide the truth and in turn they're turning it into a perfect court record.

MMM.....we may all meet one day yet?.........hahaha. too funny.

Foundation done in by some of its own members (possibly)?...haha...I am giddy.

Guess you guys better be real careful what you type to me ...uh?


smiles

Lyndale
 
TheBoyPaj said:
But what exactly is your claim? That there are some dots which resemble a face? Even if twelve good men say "yeah, it looks like a face" that doesn't make it paranormal and won't win you a penny.

How are you going to convince them there is something odd going on?
Click to expand...



"Beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation: such paranormal phenomena as telepathy; a medium's paranormal powers".

This is the first definition I found when I searched for paranomal

You telling me what I am saying isnt behind the range of normal experiance? (assuming I prove it true of course).


If some idiot can tell them they can float off the floor then some idiot ought to be able to tell em they see faces.....smiles.

Like I said........I am glad it will jury and not them deciding.
I don't trust them.

I'll prove it in court....promise.

Lyndale
 
This is the equivalent of asking for the prize for presenting a mustard stain that looked Michael Jackson. Even if a jury agreed that it looked like Michael Jackson, it still would not be eligible for the million dolllars.
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
You telling me what I am saying isnt behind the range of normal experiance?
Click to expand...
Well, to be pedantic, we are telling you what you are seeing isn't beyond the range of normal experience, which is what I think you meant to say.

Taking pictures of static and then running those pictures through a lossy image filter like JPEG will generate artifacts in the static. Some of those artifacts will trigger the face-recognition section of the brain in the same way that a three-hole electrical outlet triggers it. This will happen in different places on different images, and the faces will look different on different images, but it will happen every single time.

Filing a case in court is not nearly the same thing as winning a case in court. The JREF will undoubtedly find expert witnesses in image processing and neuroscience that will tear holes in your argument you didn't even know were there. And if you can't defend your beliefs against amateurs like us here on the board, snowballs in Hell are going to look at your court case and say "Wow! That was quick!"

Been fun chatting with you.
 
Why do you think that the jurors are going to respond to your claims any differently than the people here are? Is it because the population at large aren't as skeptical, i.e. taken in easier by non-sense? Be sure to get your jury selected from a John Edward audience.
 
You would have to provide original images or film negatives to any "court".

Since you will have to provide them anyway, why not direct us to a few that we can look at?

I am still not exactly sure what you claim to be seeing. Are they merely images of faces, or are they actual live beings?



I think this is going to be like asking Nancy Lieder for evidence. :D
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
I'll prove it in court....promise.

Lyndale
Click to expand...

I look forward to reading about it, I sincerely do.

But until you actually get around to this court case, there's nothing much to be gained by simply repeating your claims here. We don't buy it so I suggest you go and get your vindication and wake us up when it's all over.
 
TheBoyPaj said:

But until you actually get around to this court case, there's nothing much to be gained by simply repeating your claims here. We don't buy it so I suggest you go and get your vindication and wake us up when it's all over.
Click to expand...
Ah, but he thinks that he is gathering "evidence" in this thread, evidence that JREF will not consider his case. I don't know why he thinks that we speak for Randi or JREF, but it's really the least of the things I can't explain in this case.
 
May I ask where you live and what is your original language?

By the way, "God is" in your signature makes no sence in english. If you wish to state that God exists then you can say God Is Real, God exists, or There is God. "God is" doesn´t mean anything I don´t think.
Try following it with an ajective or something.
What you may want to say is: "God Just Is." which means something similar.

BTW, Randi has no responcibility to test you. Even if your people would qualify for the million, then Randi could choose not to test you and nothing wrong is done. You see, you have no case no matter what Randi does or did. =)
 
"If the book the Bible and my brain are both the work of the same Infinite God, whose fault is it that the book and my brain do not agree?" - Robert Ingersoll




smiles.



Lyndale
 
I see faces.

So?

I sometimes talk to myself.

How do I know the person who is talking to me isn't really talking to me from the other side?

Someone has been thinking outside their box again.

Other side of what?

(Gives head serious shake.)

Isn't reality a nice place to live?

Fore!!
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
My day ends now. Take care. Talk to you guys tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Oooh, I can't wait. This is the bestest fun I've had all week.

May God keep you.

Lyndale
Click to expand...
And I'm confident He will, but thanks for the thought anyway.

Rolfe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom