• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Miss me? (smiles)

Ummmm... Mr. LightPiercingDarkness...

I hate to break it to you, but what are seeing in your pictures are not demons.

In fact, after viewing this image from your website:
loch_1.jpg
Click to expand...

I've concluded that you are simply the victim of ones own imagination. Humans have a natural tendency to find "patterns", even when the patterns were undeliberate (which is why you can pick out a bunny in the clouds... or see Constellations).

This might be a hasty first impression, but the image I've linked is startling familiar to me. Not the image itself, but the extraneous scrutiny. It reminds me of the movie "A Beautiful Mind". The John Nash character would read magazines, and inside his head he would find "secret messages" from the Soviets. Of course, there were no such messages, its something like Unrelational Indirect Cognitive Processing syndrome (I know that isnt the name, I seem to have forgotten what I read from those book on John Nash). If the delusion is severe enough to where it interferes with your daily life, you might be a candidate for schizophrenia.

Your inner convictions tell you that you actually see demons, but I'm sure inside your head you have you own little voice that tells you on occasion that the things you see arent real.

If you honestly do think you see these things, I recommend you go visit a psychiatrist. She'll prescribe you on some nice antipsychotics (most likely a drug called "Respirtol", something stronger if you're case is severe enough). The antipsychotic drugs will really lift the burden of delusion...
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
I don't have to prove what they are.

Just that they are.
Click to expand...
... and that they are paranormal.

You know there's a special part of our brain that's solely dedicated to recognizing faces, right? And that it can make us see faces where there actually aren't any? Like, oh, here:

outlet.jpg


That's what I see in your photos. Random static that the face-recognizing part of my brain interprets as a face but that the rest of my brain knows isn't.
 
I think, people like you remind me of a old saying.



"cut of your nose to dispite your face".


Amazing.

I can't make no one believe this or that.

I know for a fact though when a process repeats its self over and over again reproducing the same results over and over again........it aint coincedence. It ain't random patters. It is not a clould image thing either.

Wake up people.

Well I think that about covers it.

We've covered all the name callings (I think).
And the drug thing
And the cloud thing.

I'll only respond now to new attacks or new Ideas.
No repeats please.


Lyndale
 
Some more pics.

Heres a link that will take you to a few more of the photos, that I copied and saved.

Look carefully in the shades of blue, green and brown.

In some of them you see facial features and expressions.


http://photos.yahoo.com/lightpiercingthedark


I have other pictures too and video.

The video will only be seen in court if necessary.

Lyndale
 
Re: Umm...

LightPiercingDarkness said:



...dont know why I am even bothering to reply.

Bodys?


Never seen one.



From my opinion of what they are.......what purpose would it serve to have a body.
Maybe all they need is what you see?

??

Lyndale
Click to expand...

After viewing your site, I would have to say that you are finding patterns. The human mind is wired to look for patterns in rather meaningless things, such as bunnies, pirate ships, faces, ect. in clouds, and that is what it appear that you are seeing here. Yes, they will show up everytime you look at a pizilated picture, and you will probably interpret them as faces, but you are just finding patterns. When I was a child, we had wallpaper in our bathroom with a large floral pattern on it, and it would amuse me while in the bathroom to count the 'faces' I saw in the pattern to the point that I rarely 'saw' the flowers, but just the faces.
 
Do you have any images that aren't in JPEG format? GIF or even bitmap would be better. JPEGs have a lot of loss to them that make the pictures harder to decipher.

For what it's worth, I do indeed see faces in some of your circles. There's a great one, with eyebrows and a sneer and everything, in the circle at about (115, 95), about a third of the way down and a third of the way from the left, on this image.
vwp


But that face, and all the others I can see, are the distorted, cartoony faces I have come to expect from my face-recognition sub-processor.

That your demonstration is repeatable is not a refutation of this face-recognition argument.
 
Very convincing.

But I'm a little worried that this phenomenon is so real that it may not qualify as paranormal enough to win the prize. Maybe a tort jury would command Randi to give you the money 'tho. If I participate in funding the tort would you assign to me a proportionate part of the winnings? I propose that I participate 10%. If the outlay for court costs is too burdensome for you - it costs about $75 in my jurisdiction to file a suit - perhaps others will participate like me.

I do suggest that you keep some interest yourself, so that others will know that you are at least a little willing to put your own money where your mouth is. Just as I guess Randi has at least some of his own money in the prize.
 
This thread has been reported for making legal threats as a form of harrassment. I do not find any posts in this thread to be violations of the rules. Silly, yes.
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
I know for a fact though when a process repeats its self over and over again reproducing the same results over and over again........it aint coincedence. It ain't random patters. It is not a clould image thing either.
Click to expand...

Do you know how digital imaging works?

Do you know of the "lossiness", "striations", "equalizing", or "saturating" effect attributed to JPEG encoded images? That's where all the color variations come from, and that's why all your "proof" is repeatable. However, you are mistaking the evidence for 90% Quality JPEG encoding for evidence of demons.

You are trying to turn the completely unremarkable into something supernatural.
 
Pareidolia: Folks, Its been explained to LightPiercingDarkness (ICan...) many, many times. Just FYI:
ICan originally came here with pictures from an internet site showing underwater scenes at Loch Ness. First of all, he passed these off as his own work.
Later we were entertained with grainy digital snaps of ICan....'s basement walls. These were crawling with pictures of demons (yes, before you ask, it has been mentioned to ICan... that these could be aliens, middle earthers, goblins ar whatever. He prefers 'Demons'). Funnily enough, you have to completely distort your screen settings/saturation/contrast to get the 'best' view of these Demons.
Now that ICan.. has started using his own pictures instead of stealing images from the Loch Ness camera, He thinks that he is entitled to the $1 million dollar prize.
ICan.... cannot be reasoned with,
ICan.... does not understand digital imagining
ICan.... is not a troll per se, He is more like a deluded woo woo with a stubborn mind set.
As long as you aren't too serious, he can be mildy entertaining.
Have Fun
Peter
 
[QUOTEYahweh really needs to clean his bedroom... [/QUOTE]

No kidding, with a room like that there's no way you're going to get laid
 
Hello there, Lyndale Quesenberry.

Remember me? Did you miss me?

Do you want to go over this, again? I'm ready.

Are you?
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
I'll only respond now to new attacks or new Ideas.
No repeats please.


Lyndale
Click to expand...

Hello Lyndale. I've never responded to you before and I don't think anyone has asked this yet.

When you claim that these are "faces", are you specifically meaning that they are images of someone's face (whether living or dead)?

Or are you happy with the assessment that they are simply a collection of shadows which has a basic form of a face?

If it is the former, then there is nothing paranormal involved and so it falls outside of the remit of the Randi challenge. After all, this is a face:

. .
-

but it is not paranormal and proving that it looks like a face won't win you a million.

If you are claiming that they are more significant than that, how exactly are you going to prove that in court? If you don't know what they are, how can you convince a judge that they are paranormal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom