Micro Spheres in world trade center dust solved.

Has anyone ever considered just joining STJ911, which seems to be Jones-friendly territory, and simply ask what's up with l'microspheres, and read up on posts about them...maybe even toss Steven a question or two?

TAM, you'd be good. Just go in through the front door. Hide nothing. Be polite. Be constructive...and simply ask.

(Oh yeah, tell them Max sent you.)

That's exactly how they pad their membership. You join as a critic of the conspiracy story - to enlighten the sheep - and they use it to say "See how many "scholars" think the towers were blown up?"

Giving these charlatans anything other than scorn is helping them con the public.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly how they pad their membership. You join as a critic of the conspiracy story - to enlighten the sheep - and they use it to say "See how many "scholars" think the towers were blown up?"

Giving these charlatans anything other than scorn is helping them con the public.

Spot on. Plus, I don't need to become a member of an absurd group/forum in order to pose questions to them, just as I don't need to join a racist group/forum to pose questions to them.
 
I've always felt there is a very big difference between the people on top of the conspiracy industry and their consumers. Most of the consumers are simply people who lack critical thinking skills and are too lazy to do their own research. But the people on top, the industry leadership is doing meticulous research to find any and every quote or photo which can be manipulated into a tool to create more consumers.
 
Did we not have S. Jones answer some questions through a forum member here who had an email convo with him? I believe, IIRC, that he selectively answered a couple of questions, but did not answer much of anything important.

Anyone remember the title of the thread where this was discussed?

You would not pay me enough to provide my personal information to a 9/11 truth site of any kind...sorry Max.

TAM:)
 
Jones should put out a 2008 spectra calendar

Well hopefully Jones will provide more information at Physorg after he's done raging. :)


Happy New Year everyone!

Don't drink and think.
 
I look forward to the release of his samples and data sets for independent verification and review...

Happy New Year Max...Think before you Drink.

TAM:)
 
My wish for 2008 is that no one uses Jones lies as an excuse to blow something up McVeigh style.
 
My wish for 2008 is that no one uses Jones lies as an excuse to blow something up McVeigh style.

I hope somebody tries! I do! Because with the sort of grounding in reality Truthers have, they will blow themselves to eternity just making the bomb, and we will have;

1. A few less idiots in the gene pool.

2. Reason to outlaw them all as terrorists.
 
My wish for 2008 is that no one uses Jones lies as an excuse to blow something up McVeigh style.


They can try, but I think they'll have a tough time handling all that thermite and figuring out where to put it...
 
Last edited:
Certainly. First, note that roughly 99% of the evidence - the steel - was destroyed. Now we are forced to do with what little evidence we can get. The remaining evidence that thermite was used to heat-weaken the towers to initiate collapse is found in the impeccable NCSTAR 1-5A/9/C, and in the videos and photos from which that report was derived. I claim that the numerous anomalous phenomena in 15A9C are best explained by planted incendiaries. But to see this, one must first be very familiar with the report, have a clear mental catalog of the anomalous phenomena I am describing, have seen examples of these phenomena in video, and pondered what it means that these phenomena are - according to NIST - correlated. Without these minimal prerequisites, MAX-MIHOP makes zero sense. In fact, to help people with these prerequisites, I started Bedtime Stories, with Max Photon. It's really potent - everyone's asleep.


You're lying, as usual. The steel lay around for months. NIST researchers were not denied access.
You are an agenda-driven ignoramus who doesn't understand anything about the use of thermite. There were no "planted incendiaries"--no one who works in demolition thinks you have the slightest idea of what you're talking about. Your imaginary conspiracy is mathematically impossible.
 
Learn how to spill.

Max, you crack me up. You are a bright ray of, well, photonic sunshine shining through a cloud of dour, pretentious dilettantes.

I am a dilettante, also, but not so dour that I can't appreciate your humor.

Have you considered writing for the Onion? Hollywood? (after the strike ends, that is)
 
Max, you crack me up. You are a bright ray of, well, photonic sunshine shining through a cloud of dour, pretentious dilettantes.

I am a dilettante, also, but not so dour that I can't appreciate your humor.

Have you considered writing for the Onion? Hollywood? (after the strike ends, that is)
This ironically comes from someone who once entertained the idea of micro-nukes in the basement of the towers. The "Elevator Cannon" theory I believe. The idea was that a mini nuke was placed in the basement of the towers core, and the core directed the blast to the top sections. Did I get that right Metamars? I can link to the physorg page if you like.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=3108&view=findpost&p=50951

It was pointed out that people survived the nuclear explosion in the core staircase. And that elevators would have been sent into the air like shotgun pellets. Hence the name 'elevator cannon'...

At least Max is skirtting the realm of reality. Heat DID weaken the steal. Just not the way he suggests. I'm not sure even the writters of star trek would entertain the elevator cannon theory on one of their shows. With or without the strike.
 
Last edited:
This ironically comes from someone who once entertained the idea of micro-nukes in the basement of the towers. The "Elevator Cannon" theory I believe. The idea was that a mini nuke was placed in the basement of the towers core, and the core directed the blast to the top sections. Did I get that right Metamars? I can link to the physorg page if you like.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=3108&view=findpost&p=50951

It was pointed out that people survived the nuclear explosion in the core staircase. And that elevators would have been sent into the air like shotgun pellets. Hence the name 'elevator cannon'...

At least Max is skirtting the realm of reality. Heat DID weaken the steal. Just not the way he suggests. I'm not sure even the writters of star trek would entertain the elevator cannon theory on one of their shows. With or without the strike.

Didn't Willy Wonka have one of those elevator cannons? OMG INSIDE JORB!!11!!!!!ELEVENTY!!!
 
Didn't Willy Wonka have one of those elevator cannons? OMG INSIDE JORB!!11!!!!!ELEVENTY!!!

Even Willy didn't have a micro-nuke in the factory core. Though there are many similarities between the Chocolate factory and the conspiracy industry. Both have Umpa Lumpas who eat way too many chocolate bars.
 
Even Willy didn't have a micro-nuke in the factory core. Though there are many similarities between the Chocolate factory and the conspiracy industry. Both have Umpa Lumpas who eat way too many chocolate bars.

:D
 
This ironically comes from someone who once entertained the idea of micro-nukes in the basement of the towers. The "Elevator Cannon" theory I believe. The idea was that a mini nuke was placed in the basement of the towers core, and the core directed the blast to the top sections. Did I get that right Metamars? I can link to the physorg page if you like.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=3108&view=findpost&p=50951

It was pointed out that people survived the nuclear explosion in the core staircase. And that elevators would have been sent into the air like shotgun pellets. Hence the name 'elevator cannon'...

At least Max is skirtting the realm of reality. Heat DID weaken the steal. Just not the way he suggests. I'm not sure even the writters of star trek would entertain the elevator cannon theory on one of their shows. With or without the strike.

Ironic? Apparently, you are attempting a deft insult, by implying that you find my serious discussion of the micro-nuke hypothesis in physorg as humorous as Max Photon's many funny and witty posts, of which the one I quoted made me laugh out loud. And in which it's obvious that MP intended to be funny.

Well, boo hoo.

Not to worry, though, I can easily read more of MP to cheer me up.
 
Did the debate or discussion on this subject a Phys.org between Dr. Greening and Dr Jones ever happen? I thought it was supposed to be after the holidays.

Does anybody know what happened?
 
Did the debate or discussion on this subject a Phys.org between Dr. Greening and Dr Jones ever happen? I thought it was supposed to be after the holidays.

Does anybody know what happened?

NO it did not happen, I doubt that it will ever happen.

I believe that some one got a personal chemistry lesson, on it, I can not say more.
 

Back
Top Bottom