Micro Spheres in world trade center dust solved.

Max Photon said:
Ben, have you been away for a light year (which is - like - a year)?

Ignition by laser got out-ranked by ignition by jet impact.


Max Virtue


ETA: For the those with low mental load capacity, the above references thermite fuse.

Thermite fuse (which ignited planted thermite) was ignited by jet impact (not by lasers).

Get it?

Planted thermite was linked and ignited by thermite fuse.

Thermite fuse was ignited by jet impact.
Click to expand...


Why do you continue to lie? It has been shown conclusively that you don't know anything about thermite and its uses. No thermite was used at the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks.

Seriously--WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO LIE?
 
jsfisher said:
Was that a Stundie Award attempt or part of some inside joke I have missed?
Click to expand...
9,500,000,000,000 kilometers away is Max's problem. He has no concept of reality with most his posts. It is normal Max stuff confusing reality with fantasy, and appears to be reflected in his time and distance problem.

I was trying to relate this to the micro spheres and have failed. It would be a stundie if it was not normal for Max.
 
Last edited:
A twoofer at a woo/twoofy forum I go to has posted

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4186920967571123147&hl=en

"Dr._Steven_E._Jones_Boston_911_Conference_12-15-07_Red_chips_Thermite.mov

Dr. Steven E. Jones at the Boston 9/11 Conference 12/15/07 (excerpt). New evidence in the WTC collapse investigation!"


Recently the "smoking gun" for thermite was iron spherules, now he's brought in red chips. Hedging his bets much?

Have these red chips been discussed here yet? I'd love to hear what Dr Greening has to say on them.
 
How anyone can trust anything in Jones possession is beyond me. Especially when it makes his case. It is almost certain that something is missing/held back which destroys said case. "Chain of custody" doesn't impress me. especially in light of all his obvious lies...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

I guess he must be humored because he was a professor once. I on the other hand, I think liars should all be treated the same. Must just be me... :confused:
 
Last edited:
Max, when last I was up to date on this, you had WTC 7 containing an immense laser complex able to set off externally-mounted nano-thermite shock tubes...

Well, I am glad (really) that you now understand why that was impossible, but I still cannot fathom why you cling to thermite? Can you tell me in a paragraph what evidence makes you think this?
 
Welcome to Chain of Custody. For Angel, press 1. For ToughMommie, press 2...

FactCheck said:
How anyone can trust anything in Jones possession is beyond me. Especially when it makes his case. It is almost certain that something is missing/held back which destroys said case. "Chain of custody" doesn't impress me. especially in light of all his obvious lies...
Click to expand...


Yeah! That Jones! He makes me so mad!

He should have handled the evidence like they handled WTC steel.
 
Evidence for MAX-MIHOP, in one paragraph.

BenBurch said:
... I still cannot fathom why you cling to thermite? Can you tell me in a paragraph what evidence makes you think this?
Click to expand...


Certainly. First, note that roughly 99% of the evidence - the steel - was destroyed. Now we are forced to do with what little evidence we can get. The remaining evidence that thermite was used to heat-weaken the towers to initiate collapse is found in the impeccable NCSTAR 1-5A/9/C, and in the videos and photos from which that report was derived. I claim that the numerous anomalous phenomena in 15A9C are best explained by planted incendiaries. But to see this, one must first be very familiar with the report, have a clear mental catalog of the anomalous phenomena I am describing, have seen examples of these phenomena in video, and pondered what it means that these phenomena are - according to NIST - correlated. Without these minimal prerequisites, MAX-MIHOP makes zero sense. In fact, to help people with these prerequisites, I started Bedtime Stories, with Max Photon. It's really potent - everyone's asleep.
 
Last edited:
Max Photon said:
Yeah! That Jones! He makes me so mad!

He should have handled the evidence like they handled WTC steel.
Click to expand...



So, you've read the report on how the WTC steel was handled? Or are you just parroting Loose Change?


**SQUAWK SQUAWK**

How was it mishandled?

**SQUAWK SQUAWK**
 
Last edited:
Max Photon said:
Yeah! That Jones! He makes me so mad!

He should have handled the evidence like they handled WTC steel.
Click to expand...

Better to have a guy like Jones give us photos of pancaked concrete floors and call them molten steel, huh... Or fuzzy vid caps of a broken window area of WTC 7 and call it squibs when it falls apart... Or what about the incredible research skills shown when he points to a white area of an Internet photo and calls it thermite. Or the photo of WTC 7 before the north tower fell and say it was taken after it fell.

You people like to say there are too many coincidences on 9/11. You never look at the many coincidences of guys like Jones.

And that you defend someone with that track record proves to me you are not interested in truth. As others have pointed out, you know you aren't telling the truth. You may have others here fooled but not me.

D.3.1 Identifying and Saving Pieces
As shown in Figure D-4, the engineers searched through unsorted piles of steel for pieces from WTC 1 and WTC 2 impact areas and from WTC 5 and WTC 7. They also checked for pieces of steel exposed to fire. Specifically, the engineers looked for the following types of steel members:
• Exterior column trees and interior core columns from WTC 1 and WTC 2 that were exposed to fire and/or impacted by the aircraft.
• Exterior column trees and interior core columns from WTC 1 and WTC 2 that were above the impact zone.
• Badly burnt pieces from WTC 7.
• Connections from WTC 1, 2, and 7, such as seat connections, single shear plates, and column splices.
• Bolts from WTC 1, 2, and 7 that were exposed to fire, fractured, and/or that appeared undamaged.
• Floor trusses, including stiffeners, seats, and other components.
• Any piece that, in the engineer’s professional opinion, might be useful for evaluation. When there was any doubt about a particular piece, the piece was kept while more information was gathered. A conservative approach was taken to avoid having important pieces processed in salvage yard operations.


http://doc.tms.org/ezMerchant/prodtms.nsf/ProductLookupItemID/JOM-0203-5/$FILE/JOM-0203-5F.pdf?OpenElement
 
Last edited:
Crazy Chainsaw said:
The two most likely canidates are inducers and gas sensors for the Chips, http://powerelectronics.com/mag/power_inductor_core_material/

Some electronic books even advocate using fly ash magnetite particles in place of iron powder. In large Inductors.

Carbon monoxide an smoke detectors also use Iron oxide and tin with aluminum.
Click to expand...

Interesting, CC. What do you think of the suggestion that the red chips are paint flecks?

I just found an image of one of Jones' comparisons:

JonesChemSigComparison.jpg


http://stj911.org/jones/Boston_2007.html

Edit: they don't look the same to me. Plus, why is the one on the right cut short?
 
Last edited:
orphia nay said:
Interesting, CC. What do you think of the suggestion that the red chips are paint flecks?

I just found an image of one of Jones' comparisons:

[qimg]http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w194/orphia/JonesChemSigComparison.jpg[/qimg]

http://stj911.org/jones/Boston_2007.html

Edit: they don't look the same to me. Plus, why is the one on the right cut short?
Click to expand...

It looks like he has found inducers each is different depending on the amount of charge stored in the inducer.
Also composition of electronics would vary, he also might have found pre 1980 microchips, or transistors.

Depositing Fe 304 0n a chip is well known oxidize that chip in a fire, and you have exactly what Dr. Jones found.
 
I would like to see him present the spectral outputs from his chips placed next to outputs from these inducers CC...he conveniently has a slide up only showing them compared to thermite...why am I not surprised.

TAM:)
 
Yeah, and I'd like the "Max Photon discount," if you know what I mean

Has anyone ever considered just joining STJ911, which seems to be Jones-friendly territory, and simply ask what's up with l'microspheres, and read up on posts about them...maybe even toss Steven a question or two?

TAM, you'd be good. Just go in through the front door. Hide nothing. Be polite. Be constructive...and simply ask.





(Oh yeah, tell them Max sent you.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom