Michael Avenatti thread

It is not yet. Fortunately you do have people who remember what values made America great. They are not going to roll around in the muck with the likes of Avenatti.

Imagine if Trumpolini runs for a second term in 2020 and loses.

Think about it.
 
Last edited:
So its all good if you have a Democrat scumbag in power because he is your scumbag and you get your judges. Get behind Avenatti then.

Uh, that's not the point I'm trying to make.

Every post I've made in this thread has been saying Avenatti is irrelevant. If the guy was on fire, I'd have to think at least twice before pissing on him.
 
Last edited:
So its all good if you have a Democrat scumbag in power because he is your scumbag and you get your judges. Get behind Avenatti then.

I am behind Avenatti, just not for president. I want him to keep being a lowlife gutter rat, going after our president who is also a lowlife gutter rat.
 
It is not yet. Fortunately you do have people who remember what values made America great. They are not going to roll around in the muck with the likes of Avenatti.

Getting a president who believes in American values in office will require doing things inconsistent with those values.
 
Her story seems credible. The fact that there is allegedly footage, that security guards were allegedly involved, and that the police are now involved means that we should learn the truth of this one with a high degree of certainty in a reasonably short amount of time.

I definitely advocate for exactly the same thing I advocated for with Kavanaugh - a full and fair investigation.
 
Getting a president who believes in American values in office will require doing things inconsistent with those values.

Exactly. Avenatti is on a hill drawing the enemies fire and encouraging the enemy "to die on that hill". We need to keep supplying Avenatti until he is overrun. Then we'll concentrate on "Warren Hill" or '''Hill' Hill". We just need to bog them down and let them get stuck in the mud. So many hills ...
 
He's the guy she happened to hire. It's not like she was having a tough time finding representation and he bravely stepped up to take a stand.

How do you know how many other lawyers she spoke to who didn't take the case? I'm not saying she did or didn't as I have no idea how difficult it was for her to find legal representation. My question is: do you?
 
How do you know how many other lawyers she spoke to who didn't take the case? I'm not saying she did or didn't as I have no idea how difficult it was for her to find legal representation. My question is: do you?

There's no evidence she asked or was rejected by anyone else; which is sufficient until reason to believe otherwise emerges.
 
From: https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/22/politics/avenatti-case-referred-misdemeanor-consideraton/index.html
The Los Angeles County District Attorney's office declined to file felony domestic violence charges against attorney Michael Avenatti on Wednesday, choosing instead to refer the case to the Los Angeles City Attorney's office for consideration of misdemeanor charges.

Anyone familiar with California law: How common is it for misdemeanor charges to be dropped?

Also from the same article:

They (Avenatti's lawyers) also said Avenatti's statements are bolstered by witnesses, as well as surveillance video in the halls, elevator and entrance to the building.

Granted, its Avenatti's own lawyers (so they might be biased), but if there were something captured on video I doubt they would claim otherwise. (I'm not sure just how much of the incident was supposed to have happened outside the apartment however.)
 
He's the guy she happened to hire. It's not like she was having a tough time finding representation and he bravely stepped up to take a stand.

How do you know how many other lawyers she spoke to who didn't take the case? I'm not saying she did or didn't as I have no idea how difficult it was for her to find legal representation. My question is: do you?

There's no evidence she asked or was rejected by anyone else; which is sufficient until reason to believe otherwise emerges.

No, it's not sufficient. You made an assumption based on no evidence one way or the other.
 

Back
Top Bottom