May 2007 Stundie Nominations

[Mobyseven]

Prop1- there is multiple, independent, uncontradicted 1st responder testimony that 7 was blown
Prop2- We have no reason to believe all this testimony to be mendacious
Conl- Therefore, 7 was blown

∴ p
∴ q
∴ r

Nope, nothing invalid about that at all...

 

[Firestone]

Paul Joseph Watson's peculiar warning about ad hominem's on The View:

Expect a week long orgy of ad hominem attack pieces from Neo-Con attack dogs like O'Reilly, Hannity and the rest of the usual suspects.

 

[Aggs]

In a response on YouTube to a video of Danny Jowenko:

zensmack89 (7 hours ago) marked as spam
Some of them are quick reads. Unlike the bloated redudndent NIST report. After all it doesn't take long to point out the inpossible.

So remember, less information is better when investigating large scale catastrophes.

Link: [youtube url]/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI#GU5U2spHI_4

(I can't post URL's)

 

[8den]

Paul Joseph Watson's peculiar warning about ad hominem's on The View:

From the same article

Resident Neo-Con Stepford Wife Elizabeth Hasselbeck

Hey Paul! Got irony?

 

[uk_dave]

Truthers are great

They never have to support their claims with evidence.

They happily ignore the extreme element in their midst.

They write crap like this....

8bitagent
Both the US government AND al Qaeda are ultimately controlled by one and the same evil group: Just like both sides of world war 2.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&st=0&#last

I wonder who he could mean.

 

[ArmillarySphere]

Hear one conspiracy theory, hear them all. Eventually.

 

[Belz...]

Just like both sides of world war 2.

Yeah that makes sense... if you're George Lucas.

 

[8den]

They never have to support their claims with evidence.

They happily ignore the extreme element in their midst.

They write crap like this....



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&st=0&#last

I wonder who he could mean.

From the same thread

Im not LIHOP. Im not MIHOP. I believe in NWOHop. And that is not debunkable.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&st=0&#last

They. Are. Evolving. No 8bit agent its not "not debunkable" it's more like it's not provable. Waving your hands and announcing theres a shadowy conspiracy that we cannot disprove exists isn't the same as undunkable.

Incidently there is so much misogyny on that site over "the view" how many women have turned them down for dates?

 

[8den]

Yeah that makes sense... if you're George Lucas.

Hey putting the dimwitted alien in charge of an entire planet seemed like a plausible plot device to Lucas.

Breath in and Out. Let go of the hate. Honestly if he's thick enough to come up with that, he mus pay someone to wipe his drool for him.

 

[Disbelief]

This doesn't qualify, but man is it funny:

I would like to meet up with some truthers over here in the uk but I went to a meeting of twoofers in Leeds and most of them looked like they needed a bath.
I had a chat with Annie Machon she was ok and seemed clean.
So really I'm looking for non gippo non hippy normal people to go for a beer with.
don't look too good

Link:http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9413

 

[chipmunk stew]

From the same thread


http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&st=0&#last

They. Are. Evolving. No 8bit agent its not "not debunkable" it's more like it's not provable. Waving your hands and announcing theres a shadowy conspiracy that we cannot disprove exists isn't the same as undunkable.

Incidently there is so much misogyny on that site over "the view" how many women have turned them down for dates?

Wow! Good one. This has been a banner month for submissions so far.

 

[HyJinX]

Has NWO Kitty been moonlighting on the side????

We know the new world order was clearly behind 9/11, the war on terror, the drug smuggling that goes on, etc. But there is a subject many people are just too afraid to talk about, or just dont want to know about:

Child Sex Slavery and Kidnapping world wide.

That damn cat.

 

[apathoid]

I also do not think that the towers were hit by regular planes, but more likely by some kind of missile encased in something made to look like a plane, this caseing thus disintegrating on impact (probably caused by the explosions).

Link.


Yeh, because we all know 30 tons of JetA won't explode....only missiles and bombs explode.

Because if it was a plane, it's debris & wreckage could be easily identified as not belonging to AA11 & UA175.

Link.


Yeah, obviously a huge 767 sized missile(which happens to exactly resemble a 767) won't leave any of it's own wreckage or debris behind which could be easily identified as not belonging to AA11 & UA175.

The complete void of logic and reason displayed by many members of the Twoof movement never cease to amaze me...

 

[apathoid]

Oh ....my ....God!

Explosives have a use-by date.

(Which is why it becomes imperative to have a war now and again. I understand it's much cheaper to throw ordnance onto say, Iraq, than to dispose of it carefully at home.)

Link.


So let me see if I have this right...... we started a war, which at present is costing thousands of lives and almost 400 billion USD - just to use ordnance which was getting ready to expire??

 

[Brainache]

You mean bombs go off?

 

[qarnos]

You mean bombs go off?

Give this man a prize!

 

[ref]

This article by Steve Watson has so much Stundie material, I don't know what to begin with. Prisonplanet has these regularly, so they might be worth a Stundie now and then. Here are some:

http://infowars.net/articles/may2007/170507NYT_fails.htm

More mainstream coverage, more ignorance of the facts

They trutherized the title. That's a good start to a Stundie piece.

It also underlines the fact that the debunkers are losing the battle to quell the public's desire to uncover the lies and discover what really happened on 9/11 as their line of argument becomes more diluted and weakened with each ill informed and poor researched attack piece they produce.

Who did the poor research again?

In addition rescue workers, EMT's and witnesses on the ground were warned WTC 7 was going to be intentionally brought down by explosives.

Are you sure, Steve?

 

[uk_dave]

Safety in numbers

Headhunter:
How Many Of Us Are There Now?, The growing army of 9/11 truthers
I'd say probably 100-200,000 full-on 9/11 truthers now, and 100,000,000 who are on side with us or close to it, in the U.S.

Buddy:
Board stats says this:
We have 3,189 registered members

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9418

They would all learn a valuable lesson if they were to take a couple of weeks away from internet forums and prisonplanet.
They would then discover that the population at large neither knows about their movement, nor does it care.

 

[ref]

28th Kingdom has a serious contender for this month's stundie

Imagine a tall wooden poll... say 500 feet high (fastened to the ground... no chance of it falling over) ... now remove the top 50 feet (1/10th) and elevate it 100 feet (1000 feet... 10000 feet - I don't care) over the lower section of the poll... now release this upper section, so that it will fall straight down and collide with the lower section. Will this upper section penetrate (split) the lower 450 feet all the way to the ground... while turning it (the lower section) into sawdust?

And if so... will this upper section (made of the same material as the devastated lower section) not only remain in tact during this entire impact/collision - but increase in size? (That's basically what NIST says happened to the core of the twin towers.) Or will the upper section simply make contact with the lower section... maybe do some kind of damage upon impact... and then topple over to the side? (path of least resistance)

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&view=findpost&p=13571474

This one is long, sorry. I just couldn't leave anything out of it

 

[stateofgrace]

28th Kingdom has a serious contender for this month's stundie



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9347&view=findpost&p=13571474

This one is long, sorry. I just couldn't leave anything out of it

This is a winner, an absolute winner. Unfortunatly even when it is pointed out 28th cannot quite grasp how silly it is.

My example was to illustrate path of most/least resistance... not to say a wooden poll and the twin towers are comparable structures.

Guess what? I'm right... guess.. yer clueless... guess what? I pity your mother...

* snigger*