May 2007 Stundie Nominations

[Travis]

I'd like to nominate Kevin Barrett, who really did his groundwork before he went to Morocco to find the alive hijacker. He is working hard to find him:



http://www.mujca.com/waleedalshehri.htm

Wow, that should make his fellow Truthers want to punch him.*


*I'm not actually saying anyone should punch him.

 

[Mobyseven]

Ladies and gentlemen - may I present to you what I consider to be the current leader of the pack...this is the very first non-9/11 CT that I really think has a chance at winning The Stundie! Behold, Sweft:

I do not pay income tax since I know how the "strawman system" works. This is why I love to poke fun at those that try and tell me that there is no conspiracy today. Unless the court can get you to accept the contract in court that you are a "PERSON", then you are not under equity law, see?

Misunderstanding of a logical fallacy, smug air of superiority, wound up by the fact that apparantly you only have to pay income tax if you admit to being a 'person'...it has my vote at this stage!

 

[Orphia Nay]

Moby, I see your Sweft nomination and raise you this Sweft nomination:

... Mr. Randi is a straw-man and just as his Birth Certificate says "JAMES RANDI", he's a slave under International Maritime Admiralty Law. Take a close at the very bottom of your birth certificates people. Does it say something like “Treasury” or “Bank Note”? Look for it and see for yourself that a GI (General Issue or a Bond) in the military is not much different than you as a bank note or Treasury bond.

Like shooting fish in a barrel, though, isn't it?

 

[Travis]

I think Sweft was created to sweep the Stundies. Who says there isn't fate*?



*Well technically I would.

 

[gumboot]

That whole thing about admiralty law, slaves, and birth certificates just blew my mind.

-Gumboot

 

[ihaunter]

I rather enjoyed his claim that atheist are being used by religious institutions.

 

[Travis]

I rather enjoyed his claim that atheist are being used by religious institutions.

Well we atheists are being used... to make religious institutions look increasingly irrelevant and illogical. Now why religious institutions want to look that way is a mystery.

 

[Architect]

I hesitate to nomiante Swift, for a fear that his discourses and perambulations (which bear an uncanny resemblance to the myopic autobiographical works of William Topaz McGonagall) are in fact a particularly well crafted and audacious piece of that which is understood to be "performance art".

 

[uk_dave]

.....in fact a particularly well crafted and audacious piece of that which is understood to be "performance art".

Only if he pissed on his keyboard before leaving.

At least, that's what I would do........

 

[chipmunk stew]

I'd like to nominate Kevin Barrett, who really did his groundwork before he went to Morocco to find the alive hijacker. He is working hard to find him:



http://www.mujca.com/waleedalshehri.htm

 

[nicepants]

Physical evidence, until you adres my discrediting of it, is out the window.

Link

MJ claims that the fact that no evidence of explosives found at WTC7 site is, in fact, evidence of a conspiracy, since that's what one would expect to be reported if there was a conspiracy.

I wonder if that means finding explosives in the rubble would DISprove the conspiracy....

 

[8den]

No, I'm sorry, this competition is not over yet. May is proving to be a banner month.

Now the May Stundies are over. If you think you can beat that, you need to bring it.

Junkies are the smartest, most charming people you'll ever meet.

Well I know who I'm voting for...

Actually this would explain alot, if they only meet junkies, than they are going to assume that troofers are the smartest and cleverest people in the world, after all they haven't got a decent yardstick to measure aganist.

I've just finished doing a documentary on a needle exchange program, in Stirling in Scotland, it took me a week just to understand the accents.

And I'm Irish.

 

[HeyLeroy]

Physical evidence, until you adres my discrediting of it, is out the window.

Link

MJ claims that the fact that no evidence of explosives found at WTC7 site is, in fact, evidence of a conspiracy, since that's what one would expect to be reported if there was a conspiracy.

I wonder if that means finding explosives in the rubble would DISprove the conspiracy....

Nicepants, you have the patience of Job for staying so calm in your dealings with this guy.

I'm highlighting my nominated bit and bolding the close second, which is only ironic:

If you have respect for the facts, you will treat the facts with respect. Your inability to do this is all the more egregious for the fact taht we have been through them together at the top.
You cannot say "People said that 7 was being brought down", since this is a distortion (minimising) of the reality. The true picture is as we outlined at the start: there is multiple, reliable, independent, uncontradicted 1st responder testimony that 7 was blown. Or to lay it out deductively:
Prop1- there is multiple, independent, uncontradicted 1st responder testimony that 7 was blown Prop2- We have no reason to believe all this testimony to be mendacious Conl- Therefore, 7 was blown
Of course, if you want to address these props, go ahead. You will have to a good job at discrediting.

Linky winky

ETA: From the same post:

It is my expert opinion as an expert in the art of looking.

Update your list of experts!

 

[tacodaemon]

That whole thing about admiralty law, slaves, and birth certificates just blew my mind.

I can't stand to read his stuff anymore -- is he doing the classic routine about flags with gold fringe on them too?

 

[gumboot]

I can't stand to read his stuff anymore -- is he doing the classic routine about flags with gold fringe on them too?

Yes!

-Gumboot

 

[PhantomWolf]

How can we possibly win when we are up against this sort of reading ability....

NIST, giving absolutely no explanation for how they managed to come up with a figure, then claim it tilted 8 degrees to the south ...

(pg.201)

Later, NIST still claims that the top section tilted to the south (3 to 4 degrees) But now, they say that it also tilted to the east, and by twice as much (7 or 8 degrees) as to the south....

(pg.202)

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/i...n=display&thread=1178970617&page=1#1179050791

silly thing breaks the URL in the post.

 

[gumboot]

How can we possibly win when we are up against this sort of reading ability....



http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/i...n=display&thread=1178970617&page=1#1179050791

silly thing breaks the URL in the post.

Someone needs to tell that guy there were two towers.

-Gumboot

 

[Travis]

Someone needs to tell that guy there were two towers.

-Gumboot

That's what THEY want you to think. We all know the phrase "twin towers" is a common term for "single monolithic skyscraper."

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I'm highlighting my nominated bit and bolding the close second, which is only ironic:

If you have respect for the facts, you will treat the facts with respect.

lol... That's a damn fine Bushism right there. "We're here to solve problems, because we're problem-solvers."

 

[Mobyseven]

Moby, I see your Sweft nomination and raise you this Sweft nomination:



Like shooting fish in a barrel, though, isn't it?

Which one to include, which one...hmm...

It's going to be a tricky month deciding finalists, that's for sure!