I Ratant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,258
.Seriously? My whole point is that there's no evidence that a 16 year old is an "acceptable risk" but a 15 year old isn't, and yet it's perfectly fine, and not considered ageism to exclude them from operating a plane. For some stupid reason though, if we talk about setting an upper limit on geezers, oh noes ageism!
Since you don't seem to be following this I'll lay it out for you in plain English; if you can cite a reason a 16 year old is acceptable and a 15 year old isn't then it's worth discussing how it can't be or shouldn't be applied to the elderly. Otherwise, you really don't have anything to say or contribute and you're just arguing for arguments sake. To be honest I think we reached that point pages ago.
At least you did, and failed to see it.