Lucianarchy said:
You are wrong, and the implications of your building an extraordinary denial are enormous, far, far worse than any 'psychic scam', in fact the wilfull denial and dishonesty being employed here by a few people is exactly the sort of thing which is censoring the true development in the understanding of frontier science. You should be ashamed of yourself. One day, I can assure you, this will come back to haunt you, and you will have to deal with that shame.
Think about that before you sleep, when there is no one else around you to lie to, but yourself.
Wow, such vitriol! You’ve never really forgiven me for your humiliating defeat over the UK Lottery, have you?
Right now the clock is either spot on, or one hour out, depending on how you look at it. The time in Italy (CET) is 11.06, and the time on the forum (GMT+1) is 11.05. According to the GMT site, GMT is actually 9.05, so the "GMT" of the forum is actually BST, as far as I can tell.
This makes no difference, since I’d already assumed that “GMT”, as listed at the bottom of the forum, was actually showing BST, since the clock on my computer says “GMT+1” and then gives the same time as it is locally. However, just now CET is GMT+2, so I guessed that in this forum at least GMT must actually be BST. According to the forum on my computer Lucian’s post was 4.33 GMT+1, really meaning it was 3.33 BST. Add twenty minutes for the slowness I noticed a few days ago. 3.53. Corbin’s was one hour later, which makes it 4.53. Lucian’s right in that my theory may be unlikely and it relies a lot on fortuitous coincidence, and indeed my openness to the idea that you have some psychic power has increased. Not much, but there’s a little room for doubt that wasn’t there before. But at the end of the day one thing remains: c0rbin’s quoting of Lucian’s post is the earliest that we, as true sceptics, can be absolutely sure Lucian’s post contained the word ‘ladybrook’, ie, half an hour after the event.
even I witnessed the 'view' register additions, then there are some very dishonest people here who are keeping quiet about the fact that they viewed this post between my posting and Corbin's reply
If they were to come forward, then yes, that would rule out my theory. Nevertheless, it also shows that you did return to the forum after your initial post. Hmmm.
The fact that you and a few others here are trying to spin this into some extraordinary denial speaks volumes about the personal need you have for RV not to exist.
How tedious. For someone who refuses to debate RV in any length, that’s a laughable statement. For the record I think there is evidence that RV may exist. If you look on the thread begun by sgrenard – I suggest a series of experiments that I consider the strongest in the field. Now, why would I do that if I had a deep seated need to disprove it? I just want to know what’s going on. In your eyes, that makes me a bad person: so be it.
Of course, renata has demonstrated how such results can be gained by chance, which is another compelling argument.