Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[Lucianarchy]

What I find extremely interesting is you ignoring the evidence that it was perfectly possible for you to dump that word there.

You must live in a strange, strange world, full of conspiracy, deception and lies. Either that, or you have serious unresolved issues from childhood which relate to trust. You really think it is possible that I managed to get an hour old post edited undetected, in one of the most popular forums on the JREF, and somehow get hold of the terrorist attack in ladybrook before the police and media and tie it into tbk's challenging my rv ability thread? If you do, then your cyncicism is clinical in the extreme, Claus. If I was to post edit (undetected) for the sake of deception, why would I just put 'ladybrook', wouldn't it have been more convincing to put something like 'ladybrook bus bomb'?

Your sort of cynicism sees conspiracy and deception everywhere. Everywhere, that is, that does not fit your pre-existing beliefs of course.

There is no convincing you anyway, Claus. If someone picks up the JREF $1m, I very much expect you to suggest that Randi is in cahoots with the winner, or even the winner was using some 'secret device' which only you and 'Jeff' know about.

 

[Starrman]

Except, Luci, you NEVER posted anything to do with a bus, or terrorists, or a hijacking. You simply typed one word, which could have meant ANYTHING.

And don't forget this conveniently ignored post you made earlier:

"As with most parts of west Belfast, Ladybrook has been at the epicentre of the Troubles. A peace line separates the estate from parts of neighbouring Suffolk."

Ladybrook would have made the news eventually.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Except, Luci, you NEVER posted anything to do with a bus, or terrorists, or a hijacking. You simply typed one word, which could have meant ANYTHING.

Really? How many news items have there been which include anything to do with 'ladybrook' since my post? How many of them were as serious as a terrorist attack?

 

[thaiboxerken]

You must live in a strange, strange world, full of conspiracy, deception and lies.

It is reality that people cheat, lie and steal.

You really think it is possible that I managed to get an hour old post edited undetected, in one of the most popular forums on the JREF, and somehow get hold of the terrorist attack in ladybrook before the police and media and tie it into tbk's challenging my rv ability thread?

It's possible, unlikely ( I admit ), but possible.

Why wouldn't I... convincing to put something like 'ladybrook bus bomb'?

We don't know, Lucky, only you know. But I ask you this, if you really had an RV perception.. why did you not write something convincing like "ladybrook bus bomb"?


Your sort of cynicism sees conspiracy and deception everywhere. Everywhere, that is, that does not fit your pre-existing beliefs of course.

You seriously exaggerate the position of the skeptics here. We are saying that it's perfectly possible for you to cheat, and that it wouldn't be all too hard given the right tools.

There is no convincing you anyway, Claus. If someone picks up the JREF $1m, I very much expect you to suggest that Randi is in cahoots with the winner, or even the winner was using some 'secret device' which only you and 'Jeff' know about.


Are you sure about that? There is only one way to find out. Prove that Claus is unconvincable and go take the JREF money. Put up or shut up.

 

[Lucianarchy]

And don't forget this conveniently ignored post you made earlier:



Ladybrook would have made the news eventually.

Any word would have made the news eventually. But ladybrook is very rarely mentioned in the news, except this time, when it was mentioned the next day as ocurring only an hour after I posted it, and the fact that it was a terrorist hijack with a bus packed with explosives, driven through a residential area, en-route to a police station makes it highly significant. You may beg to differ, of course, I see some have already and see it as significant as a grass fire, or car crash . Don't let me stop you.

 

[Starrman]

Really? How many news items have there been which include anything to do with 'ladybrook' since my post? How many of them were as serious as a terrorist attack?

You didn't say anything about a terrorist attack until after it happened. You just typed 'ladybrook', big whoop.

 

[Ceinwyn]

Really? How many news items have there been which include anything to do with 'ladybrook' since my post? How many of them were as serious as a terrorist attack?

Well, in that case, how many items about brush fires in Trenton have there been? How many items about the Eiffel Tower being on fire? Or items regarding thunderstorms knocking out power in New York? Looks like Renata's still doing just as well as you.

And you also seem to forget that there was no actual terrorist attack, merely the threat of one, and in a highly troubled area. That's probably why there has been no mention of it in other news outlets.

 

[CFLarsen]

You must live in a strange, strange world, full of conspiracy, deception and lies.

The world is, indeed, often populated with liars. Such as yourself, Lucianarchy.

Either that, or you have serious unresolved issues from childhood which relate to trust.

Not really. You continue to misunderstand: It's not about trust, it's about evidence? That aside, you have zero credibility, so you asking us to trust you is a bit naive.

You really think it is possible that I managed to get an hour old post edited undetected, in one of the most popular forums on the JREF, and somehow get hold of the terrorist attack in ladybrook before the police and media and tie it into tbk's challenging my rv ability thread? If you do, then your cyncicism is clinical in the extreme, Claus. If I was to post edit (undetected) for the sake of deception, why would I just put 'ladybrook', wouldn't it have been more convincing to put something like 'ladybrook bus bomb'?

I note that you seem to equate "cynicism" with "skepticism". Two very different concepts.

Your sort of cynicism sees conspiracy and deception everywhere. Everywhere, that is, that does not fit your pre-existing beliefs of course.

Heavens, no: I am perfectly willing to be convinced. Your problem is that it is very hard to be convinced by this.

There is no convincing you anyway, Claus. If someone picks up the JREF $1m, I very much expect you to suggest that Randi is in cahoots with the winner, or even the winner was using some 'secret device' which only you and 'Jeff' know about.

Let's worry about that when someone picks up the $1M, shall we? I take it you won't have a go at it?

Lottery numbers?

 

[c0rbin]

Really? How many news items have there been which include anything to do with 'ladybrook' since my post? How many of them were as serious as a terrorist attack?

What does this have to do with anything?

If something happens next week you'd probably claim that as part of your powers of prediction as well.

 

[Ceinwyn]

Also Luci, if you could please answer an earlier question I had:

"If something else had happened there, say an 18-wheeler hitting a council house or a fire demolishing a community center, would you have said those were your predictions?"

Thanks.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Also Luci, if you could please answer an earlier question I had:

"If something else had happened there, say an 18-wheeler hitting a council house or a fire demolishing a community center, would you have said those were your predictions?"

Thanks.

You seem to miss the point, Buki. I have said, many, many times now, that I often get an impression, a 'bolt from the blue', a compelling word or name. I didn't have the impression of the words 'new york' or 'iraq'. It was 'ladybrook'. It wasn't 'ladybrook bus bomb hijack police station'. You are retrospectively fishing, Buki, if they had occured in ladybrook, then it would be mildy interesting, that's all. The fact is, that it wasn't, and it certainly wasn't a grass fire or a power cut, but a terrorist attack using a hijacked bus packed with explosives, driven through a residential area, en-route to a police station. I find it highly significant and self-evident. I am quite happy for you to draw whatever conclusion you want from that.

 

[juninho]

And you also seem to forget that there was no actual terrorist attack, merely the threat of one, and in a highly troubled area. That's probably why there has been no mention of it in other news outlets.

Let me just suggest a theory IF we believe that the post was not edited;

On 13th July 2003 there was a story on the bbc website regarding the DNA testing of about 1,000 men in the hunt for a killer of a pensioner, Gladys Godfrey, in her own home.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2846839.stm

The hunt for the killer, it is reported in the article, also featured on Crimewatch as one of their appeals for information from the public. I could not find the date the programme aired.

The interesting thing about this is that the woman lived on the Ladybrook estate in Mansfield (northern town in England). Now we know that Lucianarchy has an interest in Crime (see Police and Psychics thread) and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that she watched crimewatch that night and we know that she trawls the bbc website anyway.

My theory is that she intentionally threw in the word Ladybrook because she thought there may be some breakthrough on the case in the near future. She could then claim that she had predicted it. She just got lucky with the bus-bomb thing.

That is, of course, IF you believe she didn't edit the message, I don't.

 

[CFLarsen]

The fact is, that it wasn't, and it certainly wasn't a grass fire or a power cut, but a terrorist attack using a hijacked bus packed with explosives, driven through a residential area, en-route to a police station. I find it highly significant and self-evident. I am quite happy for you to draw whatever conclusion you want from that.

And yet, in these times of jitterish media, looking for any kind of possible terrorist attack, this incident was hardly mentioned......

In fact, only local press plus the BBC picked it up as a one-page story. No follow-ups, no big story at all. I haven't seen it anywhere else.

Perhaps you should have waited for something bigger to show up, but then, this thread might not be active anymore. That would kinda diminish the impact of your psychic powers, wouldn't it?

I find it highly suspicious that you can predict something in the very thread that discusses your psychic powers.

It stinks, Lucianarchy. To high heaven.

 

[juninho]

Let me just suggest a theory IF we believe that the post was not edited;

On 13th July 2003 there was a story on the bbc website regarding the DNA testing of about 1,000 men in the hunt for a killer of a pensioner, Gladys Godfrey, in her own home.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2846839.stm

The hunt for the killer, it is reported in the article, also featured on Crimewatch as one of their appeals for information from the public. I could not find the date the programme aired.

The interesting thing about this is that the woman lived on the Ladybrook estate in Mansfield (northern town in England). Now we know that Lucianarchy has an interest in Crime (see Police and Psychics thread) and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that she watched crimewatch that night and we know that she trawls the bbc website anyway.

My theory is that she intentionally threw in the word Ladybrook because she thought there may be some breakthrough on the case in the near future. She could then claim that she had predicted it. She just got lucky with the bus-bomb thing.

That is, of course, IF you believe she didn't edit the message, I don't.

Oops, story was on 13th March.

 

[thaiboxerken]

You are retrospectively fishing, Buki, ... I find it highly significant and self-evident. I am quite happy for you to draw whatever conclusion you want from that.

HAHAHA! Buki is fishing? LOL.

Some people hang themselves, you are one of them, Lucky.

The fact is, you only placed a word there. A word is nothing more than fishing for something. You got your something, now you are claiming it as RV.

Still in question is whether or not you even placed the word in your post before or after the "significant" event.

Renata's RV abilities are better.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Oops, story was on 13th March.

That's ok. There has been news in the Ladybrooke estate area and the original motivation for Lucky placing the word in his post are still unknown.

One word doesn't constitute a sentence.

In essence, Lucky is still trying to claim a non-prediction as his prediction.

I think Lucky should check into the local asylum.

 

[c0rbin]

You seem to miss the point, Buki. I have said, many, many times now, that I often get an impression, a 'bolt from the blue', a compelling word or name.

You are not alone, Lucky.

Everyone with a brain gets bolts from the blue.

Only overly the credulous, the paranoid schizophrenics, and you seem to think they are signs of psychic powers.

 

[Lucianarchy]

And yet, in these times of jitterish media, looking for any kind of possible terrorist attack, this incident was hardly mentioned......

So what. It happened never the less. Probably one of the main reasons it wasn't mentioned much, apart from the fact that thankfully, the security forces were able to act and no one was injured - was that the BBC were ( and still are) slap bang in one of the biggest scandals to ever hit them. Namely, their intelligence 'source' who was found dead (Friday?) who they alledged had been the one who blew the whistle on the "sexed up" WMD report, which was used by Blair to take the UK into war against Iraq. It has been a big story here, and the Beeb are at the center of it all.

The sad fact is, and this goes back through history, terrorism often gets pushed down in reportage, unless it happens on the streets of London or New York.

 

[juninho]

So what. It happened never the less. Probably one of the main reasons it wasn't mentioned much, apart from the fact that thankfully, the security forces were able to act and no one was injured - was that the BBC were ( and still are) slap bang in one of the biggest scandals to ever hit them. Namely, their intelligence 'source' who was found dead (Friday?) who they alledged had been the one who blew the whistle on the "sexed up" WMD report, which was used by Blair to take the UK into war against Iraq. It has been a big story here, and the Beeb are at the center of it all.

The sad fact is, and this goes back through history, terrorism often gets pushed down in reportage, unless it happens on the streets of London or New York.

Oh look, I've found another story about Ladybrook, this one from the Belfast Telegraph - dated 5th July 2003.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=421885

Seems that its a bit of troublesome area that Ladybrook. I'll tell you what I'm going to predict that something will happen in Brixton (suburb of london) within the next 24 hrs that will make the news somewhere.

The clock is ticking, its now 16:32 BST (or GMT +1) or is it 16:00

 

[CFLarsen]

So what. It happened never the less. Probably one of the main reasons it wasn't mentioned much, apart from the fact that thankfully, the security forces were able to act and no one was injured - was that the BBC were ( and still are) slap bang in one of the biggest scandals to ever hit them. Namely, their intelligence 'source' who was found dead (Friday?) who they alledged had been the one who blew the whistle on the "sexed up" WMD report, which was used by Blair to take the UK into war against Iraq. It has been a big story here, and the Beeb are at the center of it all.

All the more reason to divert attention from the Kelly case! A terrorist story would be perfect for this. But no, hardly a mention.

The sad fact is, and this goes back through history, terrorism often gets pushed down in reportage, unless it happens on the streets of London or New York.

Wrong. Think Paris, yesterday. Think anywhere in the world, where any event could have been a terrorist attack. You are merely inventing excuses why your "prediction" was not much a prediction.

I still lean towards the explanation that you cheated.