'Lost Civilisations'

The OP asks if there are evidences of "Lost Civilizations"...

PP represents a culture we know little to nothing of, there are no direct ancestors mucking about, and we DON'T know exactly how they managed to do what they did. We have none of their books, transcripts, or daily journals. We don't know who they were.

That we DON'T know how that line was made represents "LOST TECHNOLOGY".

So the answer to the OP's question is clearly, "Yes, there are civilizations that have been largely or almost completely erased from history. And surely some even still remain completely undiscovered."

PP itself represents a very technologically capable people, of whom we know very little. Their ways are lost to us...
 
This is dishonest. Please stop doing it.

King of the Americas said:
That we I DON'T know how that line was made represents "LOST TECHNOLOGY" MY OWN WILLFUL IGNORANCE.

So the answer to the OP's question is clearly, "Yes, there are civilizations that have been largely or almost completely erased from history. And surely some even still remain completely undiscovered."

PP itself represents a very technologically capable people, of whom we I know very little. Their ways are lost to usME...
Click to expand...

Yes, their ways are lost to you, because you refuse to read the literature. Your problem.

It's hard for me to fathom that you have spent years and years proudly proclaiming your own ignorance. Don't you have any shame?
 
Last edited:
King of the Americas said:
The OP asks if there are evidences of "Lost Civilizations"...

PP represents a culture we know little to nothing of, there are no direct ancestors mucking about, and we DON'T know exactly how they managed to do what they did. We have none of their books, transcripts, or daily journals. We don't know who they were.

That we DON'T know how that line was made represents "LOST TECHNOLOGY".
Click to expand...


Only if we redefine the term "we" to mean first person singular. :boggled:

So the answer to the OP's question is clearly, "Yes, there are civilizations that have been largely or almost completely erased from history. And surely some even still remain completely undiscovered."
Click to expand...


Yes, almost completely erased except for some humongous temple complex containing massive stone monuments! Don't miss it and bump your toe. :p

PP itself represents a very technologically capable people, of whom we know very little. Their ways are lost to us...
Click to expand...


Again, only if we redefine the term "us" to be first person singular. :rolleyes:

Anytime we find a previously lost civilization, it is no longer lost. That's pretty much what the terms "find" and "found" mean. :D
 
Last edited:
GeeMack said:
Quote:
King of the Americas said:
So the answer to the OP's question is clearly, "Yes, there are civilizations that have been largely or almost completely erased from history. And surely some even still remain completely undiscovered."
Click to expand...

Yes, almost completely erased except for some humongous temple complex containing massive stone monuments! Don't miss it and bump your toe.
Click to expand...
That's a good point.
 
Last edited:
carlitos said:
Yes, their ways are lost to you, because you refuse to read the literature. Your problem.

It's hard for me to fathom that you have spent years and years proudly proclaiming your own ignorance. Don't you have any shame?
Click to expand...

Oh, I AM SORRY.

If YOU, or the collective "we" you represent, KNOW how the line was made, with what period tools.

SHOW ME.

PROVE that baseless assertion wholly and completely without a single shred of evidence, and I'll concede utterly and completely.

So, get on it, help me get the Mythbusters on it. I challenge you to do ANYTHING to prove you are right.

Vort is the ONLY one here who has done that. I'd only like to see MORE of such testing done.
 
King of the Americas said:
The OP asks if there are evidences of "Lost Civilizations"...
Click to expand...
No she didn't, she specifically asked for extra information about the claims for a lost city in the bay of Cambray, and she specifically asked me, you derailed this thread after I answered her question to her satisfaction

SusanB-M1 said:
I would be grateful for a little help here, please. I have asked the poster concerned for a link to info about the site referred to here, but so far no answer. Could someone - Marduk if he's reading? - give me the correct counter-argument to the claim made that this is the site of an ancient, lost civilisation? Thank you.
Click to expand...
Marduk said:
theres nothing there
heres the sequence of events
1 2001 Niot discovers anomaly
2 Minister for ocean development announces its a lost city, fringers rejoice
3 Niot dredges up a piece of wood which doesnt prove anything
4 real Indian academics line up to debunk it
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1905/19050670.htm
thats all, the obvious question to ask here is as the claim for a submerged city was made by an unqualified politician without any evidence, what has happened to any supporting evidence in the decade since then, no one managed to take a photo yet,
;)
Click to expand...

:p
 
Last edited:
Marduk said:
No she didn't, she specifically asked for extra information about the claims for a lost city in the bay of Cambray, and she specifically asked me, you derailed this thread after I answered her question to her satisfaction




:p
Click to expand...

Fair enough.

I was misled by the title: "Lost CivilizationS"
 
King of the Americas said:
My conclusion, before Vort's contribution, was that the technology that did the work was "lost".
Click to expand...

And it appears to be your conclusion after his contribution.


"Plausibility" is something that has to be demonstrated.
Click to expand...

And plausible scenarios have been provided in this thread.

Could you point to where I disregarded Vort's retort?
Click to expand...

I never said that you did. I was referring to his source in my post to make a point, which was that Puma Punku would have been built using similar technology to Machu Pichu.

What part of "I don't know" doesn't compute for you?
Click to expand...

The part where you couple it with the "lost technology" claim.

Your moronic claim that I AM claiming anything by saying "I don't know how this work was done.", is literally the most backwards thing I have read here, this year.
Click to expand...

Except that you have been going through this thread claiming "lost technology", for example here:

King of the Americas said:
That line was NOT chiseled. The ONLY tools that have been found are chisels and hammers...NO SAWS. I am arguing that to suggest it WAS chiseled or created with known or traditional methods, IS a statement WITHOUT EVIDENCE.

THIS LINE WAS NOT CHISELED.

It was created with a "lost technology".
Click to expand...

I've bolded the relevant part. You see KotA that part in bold is a claim.

All you have done in this thread is make claims like the bolded line and then retreated into incredulity when challenged on it.

And I never suggested 'when' our ancestors ascended. Stop misrepresenting my statements.
Click to expand...

Shall I take this to mean that you believe that the dating techniques used on the site gave an incorrect date?

I also never misrepresented your statements. I suggest that you show me how I did.

I used known evidence about Puma Punku, Machu Pichu and a few other things and used that evidence to assess your claim. As you can see I drew two conclusions, and I suspect now that the first one was the correct one.
 
King of the Americas said:
"World Peace" was going to be a 3-day concert, that was broadcast live over the internet during the millennium new year's eve.

The purpose of which was to unite the globe's attention to one spot, in hopes that 'they' would show up.

Things did not go as planned.

Back then I was stocked full of the "Audacity of Hope".
Click to expand...

Sure it wasn't Glenmorangie?
 
So the advanced technology was saws? Saws?, really? I wonder if they built their spacecraft or whatever you want to call them with those saws? Or how about the metal and other more advanced tech needed other than saws needed to build such aircraft? Surely there would be evidence of that tech being built in the area, like factories. Really KoTa, non of what you're talking about makes sense.
 
Last edited:
What's wrong with this picture, a bunch of ancient guys working stone with handsaws, and parked near by are advanced spacecraft that can keep them in the air seemingly indefinitely?
 
Yeah_Right said:
What's wrong with this picture, a bunch of ancient guys working stone with handsaws, and parked near by are advanced spacecraft that can keep them in the air seemingly indefinitely?
Click to expand...


Put together with bronze and copper rivets...

kota001.jpg
 
Yeah_Right said:
What's wrong with this picture, a bunch of ancient guys working stone with handsaws, and parked near by are advanced spacecraft that can keep them in the air seemingly indefinitely?
Click to expand...

That is a tough one. Maybe KotA can work it out for us,seeing as we are all so willfully ignorant.
 
King of the Americas said:
There is NO SUCH THING, as evidence of an anecdotal account. They didn't give me a 'we were here t-shirt' to show you guys. A video or picture would be taken as a forgery.

The only thing I have is my sighting.

My friend and I didn't 'imagine' anything. We witnessed something we have no explanation for...
Click to expand...

Pardon me, but you're missing my point. I'm saying: How do you know that what you saw fits your ideas about an advanced, now-departed race of super-humans?

IOW, people see unexplainable and unidentified stuff in the sky, and elsewhere, all the time, all over the world. What has convinced you that the unidentifiable, unexplainable thing that you saw was an advanced race of super-humans?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom