• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unfortunately it is clear to me that if I even will give all of you full OS or NS lifestyle with earnings two times more then you have now – you will refuse to teach your children HRL because it is "Jewish language".
 
Unfortunately it is clear to me that if I even will give all of you full OS or NS lifestyle with earnings two times more then you have now – you will refuse to teach your children HRL because it is "Jewish language".

No, because it is a BAD IDEA

(If, for some insane reason, my children wish to learn Hebrew, that is up to them).
 
But my ideas are great and as every great idea don't depent from the stilistic level of language.
And yet, this entire thread revolves around two arguments: one, that language is the most important thing of all, from a person who cannot seem to master any one; and second, that anyone can master even the most important skills easily in a short period without long formal education, again from someone who has not demonstrated an ability to master even the one language he considers the most important on earth, much less the other that would allow him to communicate his ideas effectively.

Great ideas may not depend on style, but they do depend on intelligibility. Your confusion of these two is not helpful to your cause.
 
Unfortunately it is clear to me that if I even will give all of you full OS or NS lifestyle with earnings two times more then you have now – you will refuse to teach your children HRL because it is "Jewish language".

I get the impression that you are a lone voice

Some questions:
  1. When did you start publicising your HRL ideas?
  2. How many internet sites (forums, blogs, etc) have you used to publicise them?
  3. How many 'reasonably intelligent' people:
    • are aware of your ideas? (a guess will do)
    • understand your ideas? (again, a guess will do)
    • have agreed with you?
    • have offered to help you?
 
I get the impression that you are a lone voice
GOD is with me.
It is absolutely enough.
are aware of your ideas? (a guess will do)
Thousands, I hope.

understand your ideas? (again, a guess will do)

The same quantity.

have agreed with you?
Great number of people has showed a great interest to all my ideas, which I have publicized in different forums.
They are 1 “Fifty percent job time – Fifty percent free time. New lifestyle”.
2 The religious of four world religious holy books.
3 Israel has to joint EU.
4 Full Shabaton to everybody.
5 Multicultural world for multicultural people.
6 Holy Resurrected Language. Post monolingual world.
8 Interrupted life long education.
9 Week as social quanta of time.
10 Distance management in every possible point of life.
11 Quanta pattern global lifestyle

have agreed with you?


Not many but all those who agree told that my ideas are genius.
One person called me Einstein of free time.
It is because the symmetrical lifestyle gives effect of using free time almost 100%, compare today’s really effect of using free from job time.

have offered to help you?
Nobody, but my ideas give really possibility to circle trillions dollars with 10% - 15% return a year and with zero inflation for tens years.
 
How exactly is your idea supposed to present a "10% - 15% return a year and with zero inflation for tens years"? Did you actually calculate this, or just pulled the numbers out of your back orifice?
 
How exactly is your idea supposed to present a "10% - 15% return a year and with zero inflation for tens years"? Did you actually calculate this, or just pulled the numbers out of your back orifice?

There is a small quantity of machine designers, that make a great inventions and projects almost with out difficult mathematical calculations.
When after the new machine is ready and successfully tested engineers begin calculate it – they the level of optimality and efficiency from every possible point of view 90% - 98%.
And they can’t explain how designer – inventor has achieved it with out calculation.
Tesla was such type designer.
I am the same type social inventor – designer.
All my social constructions are absolutely workable and realizable.

I can design global world with 30% return and inflation smaller than zero, but it will be too difficult to 6.7 people of the world to adopt to so big gradient of their quality of life increasing.

My secret – we have teach people to spend all their money correctly and fully.
Only in this case 6.7 billions of world people have really possibilities to earn and spend correctly much more than today.

With out symmetrical job weeks – free weeks worldwide global system it is impossible to achieve global life quality gradient I am talking about.

Full Old Shabaton to everybody means today full New Shabaton to everybody.
It means equal full level of freedom to every worldwide person.
OT – NT
OS – NS.
“Not the man for Old Shabaton but New Shabaton for the man.”
 
There is a small quantity of machine designers, that make a great inventions and projects almost with out difficult mathematical calculations.
When after the new machine is ready and successfully tested engineers begin calculate it – they the level of optimality and efficiency from every possible point of view 90% - 98%.
And they can’t explain how designer – inventor has achieved it with out calculation.
Tesla was such type designer.
I am the same type social inventor – designer.
All my social constructions are absolutely workable and realizable.

I can design global world with 30% return and inflation smaller than zero, but it will be too difficult to 6.7 people of the world to adopt to so big gradient of their quality of life increasing.
Next time just say that you reached deep and pulled it out of your back orifice.
My secret – we have teach people to spend all their money correctly and fully.
Only in this case 6.7 billions of world people have really possibilities to earn and spend correctly much more than today.

With out symmetrical job weeks – free weeks worldwide global system it is impossible to achieve global life quality gradient I am talking about.

Full Old Shabaton to everybody means today full New Shabaton to everybody.
It means equal full level of freedom to every worldwide person.
OT – NT
OS – NS.
“Not the man for Old Shabaton but New Shabaton for the man.”
Assume you're a small business owner. Your company has 2 employees, plus yourself. Under your system, what would be the new work schedules for all 3? Would you need more employees? How much would they all get paid?
 
GOD is with me.
In your dreams

It is absolutely enough.
Enough for what? More dreams?

[How many 'reasonably intelligent' people] have agreed with you?
Not many but all those who agree told that my ideas are genius.
Talk is cheap

[How many 'reasonably intelligent' people] have offered to help you?
Nobody
So... from an audience of "thousands", not ONE person has offered to help... What does this tell you?

six7s said:
Now I'm more convinced than ever that your fantastic vision is (was, and - sadly - always will be) complete and utter bollock-naked nonsense

Don't give up your day job
 
Spending all my money fully is an easy task, I achieve this every month!
Now please tell me how to spend my money correctly!

You have to buy mostly different services that really you need and to buy only things that have ability be sale minimum for the same price or more.
You eat every day in new restaurant, use rental cars, taxi, common transport.
You live in rental flat or house or hotel according your current situation, use rental exclusive ensembles and jewels – every day new ones, take master classes according your current needs, use stylist services and so on – you can be sure that you spend your money with great efficiency.
Hear and now – it is the main Principe of correct money spending.

But you have to remember that the respectable person is a person who spends not more than 1% of his money.
99% of his money respectable person invest according his ideas in deferent areas of life to achieve return.
Once more – with out OS or NS effective new lifestyle is impossible to achieve.

Assume you're a small business owner. Your company has 2 employees, plus yourself. Under your system, what would be the new work schedules for all 3? Would you need more employees? How much would they all get paid?

The chapter from my book is the answer.
FJT – FFT system means Fifty percent job time – fifty percent free time system.

Confessions of a small business owner

I am the owner of a small but, thanks to God, successful window and door installation and repair business. I have been in this business for 13 years and for about the last 7-8 years, due to the large number of orders, I have had to work a 12- to 13-hour day with almost no free time.
My average profit for our services is about $18 per hour. Over the last 6 years I have employed a helper and paid him $8 per hour. I have had 5 employees in this position during this time.
My clients are very satisfied with my services and of course they recommended me to their friends and relatives. As a result of this I now have maybe twice or 3 times as many orders than I can manage. The problem is what to do in such a situation. I know very well that refusing to take on orders is a very bad thing but, on the other hand, I cannot send anyone else to do the work because my clients want me to do it personally. I also need to supervise my helper at every stage of his work.
The relationship with most of my helpers followed the same basic path. For about 4-6 months they were very intent on obtaining all the experience they could. And I, of course, did my best to pass on to them all I know. They would then advance to the place where they were producing work that was equivalent in quality to my own and so our work output doubled. I then had the opportunity of taking on and successfully completing about twice as many orders.
However, with the rapid increase in orders and earnings my helper would began to ask me to increase his hourly earnings above what I was prepared to pay. To work with a man who is not satisfied with his wages and with you not being prepared to increase them beyond the standard wage for an assistant in my type of business is not a good idea. As such, in these cases, I usually had to lay off the assistant and employ a new one, teaching them from the beginning. After leaving my employ some even tried to start their own business in my area with my clients.
You can understand how many new orders, money and nerves I lost in these cases. I consulted with some small business organisational problem specialists and they suggested the following options:
1. To agree to their demands and give them the earnings they asked for because my profit in this case would be more than was the case with loosing orders and having to change assistants.
I cannot agree with this because their current earnings are already the same as that which an assistant with one year’s experience earns in a business such as mine. However they demanded $10 to $12 per hour. The fact that they are able to do the work as proficiently as I can only proves that I am a very good teacher.
2. Not to increase their earnings today but to promise to give them a share in my business in the future.
I do not want to share my business with anybody else except my children and to promise something with no intention of carrying it out is not my way of doing things.
3. To organise the job with my assistant in such way that he would perform the less important tasks and I the more important ones. Also to take on assistants who would be suited only to these lower level tasks. In this way I would give them the feeling that it is impossible to work without me and therefore would, as far as possible, exclude the possibility of them becoming independent.
This advice is absolutely against my principles of working relationships which should see to the maximum good for the employee. Also very often I have to be absent because of meetings with clients so as to get new orders and also many other appointments outside my working area. When I return after two or three hours I would like to see the assigned work having been completed. In my case, where new doors and windows need to be fitted in an apartment or house, this kind of job can only be done by a competent worker who can work on his own without supervision or assistance.

When I read about the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” of work organisation it became absolutely clear to me how I could solve my problem and what type of helper I needed.
I would employ two active, well educated, intellectual men with many years of experience in a completely different business to mine but whose occupations unfortunately did not give them much income. These people need to work to earn money but then they have very little time for their favourite occupation.
Initially I would work according to the one-month “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” variant but should they want to this could be changed to the two-month variant. I think a really creative person would be very happy if, after a month of a hard work and good income, he had the opportunity to take a break of one month in which he could follow his favourite occupation without having to be concerned about money. The possibility to have the free time in a month-long “creative” vacation would be the additional stimulus for their good work with me.
In the situation where one of them began to earn a good income from his favourite occupation and decided for this reason to give up his job in my business I would wish him every success. My only request would be for him to inform me about 3 to 4 months beforehand so as to give me time to take on and train a new worker.
Something else. This job organisation variant seems to me more reliable than the one I now have because, as in this instance, I would have a second helper to exchange with the other.
 
So... from an audience of "thousands", not ONE person has offered to help... What does this tell you?
Look!
I don’t want to begin this great global project with $1000000.
I need not less than 10 billions just to begin and I promise 10% – 15% reterning when trillions dollars will be in global New Lifestyle of full New Shabaton circle.

Don't give up your day job

I gave up it in 1997 and I am absolutely free and happy with out job, that I hated all my life, as 99% of worldwide people of Old Life Style.
 
Look!
I don’t want to begin this great global project with $1000000.
I need not less than 10 billions just to begin and I promise 10% – 15% reterning when trillions dollars will be in global New Lifestyle of full New Shabaton circle.



I gave up it in 1997 and I am absolutely free and happy with out job, that I hated all my life, as 99% of worldwide people of Old Life Style.

Only ten billion? Let me find my checkbook. What could possibly go wrong with a scheme that proposes that everyone in the world could live a tourist life style on one percent of the income gained by working half the time?

So, in this wonderful new economy, who is going to pick the lettuce? Who is going to go out on the beaches of Bangla Desh with a torch and slice up derelict ships? Who is going to sew up the cheap t-shirts? Mind you, I'd welcome a workable scheme that reduces poverty, risk, pollution and slavery, as long as it did not impoverish me (I'm a heartless bastard when my own ox is gored) but is it just possible that you've missed something here about the economy of the real world?
 
When I read about the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” of work organisation it became absolutely clear to me how I could solve my problem and what type of helper I needed.
I would employ two active, well educated, intellectual men with many years of experience in a completely different business to mine but whose occupations unfortunately did not give them much income. These people need to work to earn money but then they have very little time for their favourite occupation.
Initially I would work according to the one-month “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” variant but should they want to this could be changed to the two-month variant. I think a really creative person would be very happy if, after a month of a hard work and good income, he had the opportunity to take a break of one month in which he could follow his favourite occupation without having to be concerned about money. The possibility to have the free time in a month-long “creative” vacation would be the additional stimulus for their good work with me.
In the situation where one of them began to earn a good income from his favourite occupation and decided for this reason to give up his job in my business I would wish him every success. My only request would be for him to inform me about 3 to 4 months beforehand so as to give me time to take on and train a new worker.
Something else. This job organisation variant seems to me more reliable than the one I now have because, as in this instance, I would have a second helper to exchange with the other.

Oh, so your solution is to have people work not for 1 company all year long but to work for 2 companies switching between one and the other at preset intervals...
Genius is not the work I would use to describe your proposed solution. For starters, it assumes that everybody can find a job that in 6 months can pay for their year round needs. I'd like to see you support that. Second, it assumes jobs don't need people to stay for long consecutive periods of time. This is of course moronic, as many projects in the real world take more than a month or two to complete. Third, the company owner is clearly not enjoying ANY free time, plus he's either training new people or retraining a guy who's been out for a month or two ever month or two. So... it doesn't work for small companies, it doesn't work for large companies, it doesn't work...
 
The chapter from my book is the answer.
As I suspect you have no idea what the question is, I see no reason to accept that you have any answers

Confessions of a small business owner

...I could solve my problem
...I would employ two active, well educated, intellectual men
...Initially I would work according to the one-month “FJT-FFT SYSTEM”
... I think a really creative person would be very happy
... in which he could follow his favourite occupation
... I would wish him every success. My only request would be for him to inform
...I would have a second helper to exchange with the other.

It is obvious that the author of that piece has a command of English that you, NC, can only dream of

Note that the bolded words are all in the future tense

Has anyone implemented your "FJT-FFT SYSTEM"?
 
Since NC has already more or less derailed this thread with his economic plans, I hope my following comment is not too much of a further derail. But that utopian plan puts me in mind of an amusing story from my youth. Long ago, when I still was somewhat religious, I found myself doing alternative service (note to non-american readers: this means I was a conscientious objector, and did this instead of going into the military) at an intentional community in upstate New York. A successful and prosperous enterprise run by Anthroposophists, with their usual mix of absolutely wacko mystical crapola and down-to earth, practicality. We often got visits from members of other communities around the country, always interested in seeing how each other solved the various problems of communal life.

One time we hosted a little delegation from a community down South, which was founded on the principles of B.F. Skinner. In particular, they took his novel Walden II as little less than their scripture. Now, to digress a bit, I hope anyone who has read Walden II, even with some admiration, will realize that this is a novel, and even in its best light more of a screed than a scripture. Skinner did do some interesting things, and have some interesting ideas, but like many innovators, once he had found something interesting, he seemed to find it everywhere, and ultimately I think he made a fool of himself when he hypostasized a theory of something into a theory of everything.

So anyway, here was this community, trying to live according to the rules laid out in Walden II, whose fictitious economy was rather attractively arranged to produce an even application of labor. It's not a bad idea on surface: the least desirable jobs are given the most credit in the local economy, which is based on a non-monetary accumulation of credit, in which one gets all one needs after fulfilling the requirement; but one cannot bank or accumulate credit, thus avoiding wealth and elitism. So, in theory, a person might well opt to clean the septic tanks or scrub pots for high pay and short hours, rather than to do more pleasant jobs, and thus accumulate a lot of free time for the many subsidized creative and recreational opportunities that the community provides(wealth being unavailable). The problem, of course, is that nobody can be forced to do anything other than by these behavioral incentives - and that includes moral suasion, community obligation, executive order, etc. All these things are odious hangovers from what BFS later disparagingly labeled "the literature of freedom and dignity." Now if arranged right, in theory, the economy soldiers on, with enough people making the useful choices, with occasional fine tuning and dynamic adjustment of incentives to insure that the balance is kept.

In practice, as the folks from the Waldenesque commune discovered, there are always holes. At the time we saw them, they were struggling with a problem. Everyone in the community had either completed their obligation, or decided on how they were going to do so. But in the mean time, a fence had broken, and the cows were getting loose. Now in an ordinary world, this would have been simple: someone says "This is an emergency. We must go down and fix that fence." But in utopia, there are no emergencies. I did my quota. There's no reward for doing more. Set the pay too high? I'm over the quota with no reward. Set it too low? Skip it, I'd rather pull weeds in the garden. The appeal to solidarity or community benefit is against the founding rules. Too bad the cows are out, but if it's not in the book, I'm off the hook.

Of course, in addition to the above, the economy of that commune was unrealistically localized. They had, in addition to the usual gardens and such, a small industry with which they funded their interactions with the rest of the world, and in the Walden II spirit, the outside world was not theirs to worry about. They did not need to trouble themselves with who made their blue jeans or their paper bags, or whether or not the people who made their pickup truck had health insurance. And yet even in that little microcosm, they found that they could not make the whole thing work without either manipulating the market or manipulating the rules, to put someone at enough economic disadvantage to get the important jobs done.

They struggled for a solution, stifled as always by the curse of a perfect theory. I do not know if they found a solution, or what it was. But meanwhile, of course, the cows kept getting out.
 
Only ten billion? Let me find my checkbook. What could possibly go wrong with a scheme that proposes that everyone in the world could live a tourist life style on one percent of the income gained by working half the time?
First $100000 of year income a man have to spend completely and effectively according my recommendations.
From more then $100000 income a man have to begin his investments.
If his income after paying taxes that have to be equal for everybody and not more then 1/7 from year return for example $1000000 – he has to spend $100000 and 900000 he has to invest in every way he want with goal to achieve good return.

So, in this wonderful new economy, who is going to pick the lettuce? Who is going to go out on the beaches of Bangla Desh with a torch and slice up derelict ships? Who is going to sew up the cheap t-shirts? Mind you, I'd welcome a workable scheme that reduces poverty, risk, pollution and slavery, as long as it did not impoverish me (I'm a heartless bastard when my own ox is gored) but is it just possible that you've missed something here about the economy of the real world?

In you’re so called "high developed" economy 10 illegal slaves in USA and all over the world work at one so called effective garbage worker from New York, who earn about $50000 - $60000 a year.

In my symmetrical lifestyle economy 80% of adult high developed countries population will have in average $100000 a year plus minus 20%.
10% will have more than $100000 and they will spend not more than 1% of their income and not less then $100000.
7% will have minimum $50000 - $100000.
3% - will have welfare ½ from minimum earning.
Average job week will be 60 hours but another week will be free.

Has anyone implemented your "FJT-FFT SYSTEM"?
It is very simple today’s technique of international collective creative job – my great ideas and your for example English language style.
But you have deeply understand and believe in those ideas.
 
First $100000 of year income...then $100000 income .... not more then 1/7 from year return for example $1000000 – he has to spend $100000 and 900000 he has to invest..... ...garbage worker from New York, who earn about $50000 - $60000 a year..........developed countries population will have in average $100000 a year plus minus 20%.
10% will have more than $100000 and they will spend not more than 1% of their income and not less then $100000.
7% will have minimum $50000 - $100000
Are these Zimbabwean dollars?



Has anyone implemented your "FJT-FFT SYSTEM"?
It is very simple today’s technique of international collective creative job – my great ideas and your for example English language style.
But you have deeply understand and believe in those ideas.
So... that's a 'No' then
 
Oh, so your solution is to have people work not for 1 company all year long but to work for 2 companies switching between one and the other at preset intervals...

You give to creative person 26 weeks in a year of creative vocation.
It means to give him a really great chance to realize his ideas.
26 weeks he will live in scrap of job he hates but implements very good and 26 weeks he will live as Ernest Hemingway in Paris.

For starters, it assumes that everybody can find a job that in 6 months can pay for their year round needs. I'd like to see you support that.
Yeas it is the main point of future life style - 26 weeks of every job have to give possibility to every world man to live high quality life standards.

Second, it assumes jobs don't need people to stay for long consecutive periods of time. This is of course moronic, as many projects in the real world take more than a month or two to complete.

For example you need a year to complete your project as a man can work for you 52 weeks, 10 job hours a day with out overpaying, one day a week free from job.
And the other year he will be in creative vacation.
You have pay him $20 in hour and he will earn 62400 for two years life.
In the year time of his creative vacation he has not get welfare of cause.

Third, the company owner is clearly not enjoying ANY free time,

He also doesn’t enjoy creative and spiritual freedom and full Shabaton for every person.

plus he's either training new people or retraining a guy who's been out for a month or two ever month or two. So... it doesn't work for small companies, it doesn't work for large companies, it doesn't work...

All life long high level educated creative and initiative employee or worker is very easy to train – almost immediately!

To bruto.
I have read your interesting text.
I am Jew and you know how I hate Hitler.
He was national socialist, but he did not take businesses from their owners except Jews.
He forced all employers to make really effective business being in very bad conditions.
Capitalists life quality was tens time better than other people, but 99% of their capital had circulated fast and gave big return.

Japan after war made the same because national socialistic and samurais traditions.

Low taxes, Zero inflation, 26 weeks vacation time a year to every employee and worker, zero unemployment, all what is possible in private hands of effective owners with effective management.

Our goal to make all people elite people.

26 weeks a year people will be workaholic lifestyle people and 26 weeks a year they will be freedomholic lifestyle people.
 
First $100000 of year income a man have to spend completely and effectively according my recommendations.
From more then $100000 income a man have to begin his investments.
If his income after paying taxes that have to be equal for everybody and not more then 1/7 from year return for example $1000000 – he has to spend $100000 and 900000 he has to invest in every way he want with goal to achieve good return.



In you’re so called "high developed" economy 10 illegal slaves in USA and all over the world work at one so called effective garbage worker from New York, who earn about $50000 - $60000 a year.

In my symmetrical lifestyle economy 80% of adult high developed countries population will have in average $100000 a year plus minus 20%.
10% will have more than $100000 and they will spend not more than 1% of their income and not less then $100000.
7% will have minimum $50000 - $100000.
3% - will have welfare ½ from minimum earning.
Average job week will be 60 hours but another week will be free.


It is very simple today’s technique of international collective creative job – my great ideas and your for example English language style.
But you have deeply understand and believe in those ideas.


It looks to me as if your system is simply a recalculation of monetary values, which will end up with little if any real gain for the working class. I say this, because in your scheme, those making under a certain minimum will be obligated to spend it all. This, then, guarantees that most will never be able to rise above that class. Add to that, that if you truly do raise the income level of all workers in a society, the cost of living will be greatly increased. Unless you fob off the difference by importing cheap goods from other countries, as we tend to do in the US, everything will cost so much more that the increases will be eaten up by the ordinary expenses of living.

A great deal of your scheme seems to depend on mandatory rules and regulations. How do you propose to enforce it all?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom