• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
1 Turn on logic.
How can Latin and Greek languages which were born long before the Great Migration of Nations relate to so called “Indo-European Languages”?
Click to expand...

Oh, at last I understand why you have been spouting complete nonsense for months and months: you believe that Indo-European languages were brought into Europe by this event. Therefore, it seems to you that no language spoken in Europe prior to the barbarian incursions that destroyed the Roman Empire in and after 400 CE can be designated as Indo-European. Greek and Latin and Welsh and Irish must therefore be descended from Biblical Hebrew or Aramaic, because the ancestors of these languages were present in Europe long before 400 CE.

I don't know what to say in response to such delusions, so I'm going to have a cup of tea and a rest before I think about these things again.
 
Last edited:
ComfySlippers said:
Hebrew Lagerinass II

The mighty Designer of Socials is scared of the word "Hebrew".
Don't let the Robot Judges learn about this weakness.

Oh Salty Hebrew of Hebrew Saltiness, Hebrew speaker of Salty Hebrew,
Believer in mythical gods and inexperienced in the real world,
Blessed be thine beliefs in Hebrew Salty Water-Filter Socks and in all things Salmonellary.
For thine is The Daft Hat, the Salt and The Hebrew,
Anal Vodka forever,
Achoo.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

This slogan or brand has potential ability to spread very widely.
 
Border Reiver said:
These already exist. They are called "linguists". These experts determined long ago that Indo-European and Semitic languages are not related.

You may now return to your regularly scheduled ingoring of reality.
Click to expand...

Please give me the name of some linguists that know Holy Resurrected Language and Sanskrit.
 
Craig B said:
No we don't. All we need is a person who can look up the simplest pages on the Internet.

Here is what such a non-expert finds.
[Sanskrit] is a standardised dialect of Old Indo-Aryan, originating as Vedic Sanskrit and tracing its linguistic ancestry back to Proto-Indo-Iranianand Proto-Indo-European. Today it is listed as one of the 22 scheduled languages of India and is an official language of the state of Uttarakhand. As one of the oldest Indo-European languages for which substantial written documentation exists, Sanskrit holds a prominent position in Indo-European studies ... The earliest attested Sanskrit texts are religious texts of the Rigveda, from the mid-to-late second millennium BCE. No written records from such an early period survive, if they ever existed. However, scholars are confident that the oral transmission of the texts is reliable: they were ceremonial literature whose correct pronunciation was considered crucial to its religious efficacy.​
So it was in existence in the tenth century BCE and wasn't the same as Hebrew.
Hebrew (/ˈhiːbruː/; עברית ʿivrit [ʔivˈʁit] or [ʕivˈɾit]) is a West Semitic languageof the Afroasiatic language family. Historically, it is regarded as the language of the Israelites and their ancestors, although the language was not referred to by the name Hebrew in the Tanakh.[note 2] The earliest examples of written Paleo-Hebrew date from the 10th century BCE.​
So it was in existence in the tenth century BCE and wasn't the same as Sanskrit.
Click to expand...

Now it is clear me why I can’t find the linguist who know Sanskrit and Holy Resurrected Language.
Because we have those texts in internet and we do not want to check them by bilingual Sanskrit - Holy Resurrected Language experts.
 
abaddon said:
Wrong yet again. "Indo-European" is the actual term used by linguists for the very reason that it is descriptive. You making up bovine terms out of whole cloth is meaningless.
Click to expand...

Meaningless to think that Latin language of Rom Empire has it’s origins roots in Sanskrit because the Latin is so called the Indo-European language.
abaddon said:
Directionality of any script is entirely arbitrary. Please account for chinese script, for example.
Click to expand...
From directionality of script depends the statistical distribution of dominance of the left or the right hemisphere of the nation of the particular language.

abaddon said:
OK, that is a flat out bizarre claim. You are claiming that out of fear of circumcision the Greeks started to write from left to right as though that would somehow prevent circumcision. Have you been imbibing some substance? How the hell does that make any kind of sense?
Click to expand...

You have to look the history of retaliation ships between Israel tribes and Greece tribes.
May be after that you will understand my great hypothesis why Greeks have changed the direction of their written from right to left.

By the way Turks in the beginning of 20th centaury have change their written from right to left too.
 
Last edited:
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
From directionality of script depends the statistical distribution of dominance of the left or the right hemisphere of the nation of the particular language.

You have to look the history of retaliation ships between Israel tribes and Greece tribes.
May be after that you will understand my great hypothesis why Greeks have changed the direction of their written from right to left.

By the way Turks in the beginning of 20th centaury have change their written from right to left too.
Click to expand...
Good. The Turks abandoned the Arabic script which didn't suit their language because it is not very efficient at representing vowels. After the fall of the Ottoman regime, the Turkish Republic adopted the Latin alphabet (but not the Latin language.)

Now, does that mean that Turkish brains changed from the left to the right hemisphere? I don't think so. Do you require to reconstruct your brain each time you switch from writing a letter in Russian to writing one in HEBREW?

Perhaps you do need to do that!
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
bathrobe – without bathrobe – never mind.Most important for you will be my great kipa of New Saturday.
Click to expand...

I would love to know what sort of mangled sentence bathrobe without bathrobe is.

Besides I'm promoting my calendar which is 100x better than yours, Or in NC speak:

For sure people will to be shouting the holy ideas of 'eat every day' this is certain
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Now it is clear me why I can’t find the linguist who know Sanskrit and Holy Resurrected Language.
Because we have those texts in internet and we do not want to check them by bilingual Sanskrit - Holy Resurrected Language experts.
Click to expand...

I bet you that we could find some Sanskrit and Hebrew experts though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom