• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Craig4 said:
If he is adding hours by family then he might accidentally be right. In 1960 few married women worked outside the home. The doubling of hours likely accounts for more women having careers. I'm sure him possibly being correct is an accident though.
Click to expand...

Well, you finally realized how many hours per week accounted for one member of the American family in 1960 and how much is today.
In 1960 it was 8.8 working hours a week on one family member.
Today we have 26.7 working hours a week on one family member.
So to live on American Standard lifestyle Americans have to work 300% more working hours on one family member!
It means that American criminal elite made working slaves for those 56 years from American citizens.
Your problem that you don’t believe in simple math figures and in God.
 
Pixel42 said:
If you said "I don't add salt when cooking or at the table" no-one would be arguing with you. I don't either, and haven't for at least 30 years. Too much salt is bad for you, especially for blood pressure, so it's sensible not to add salt when there's so much salt already in the food we eat. But you keep insisting that you do not eat salt at all, and that is simply nonsense. Salt is present in many foods, and a certain amount is essential for health. If you never ate anything that contained salt you would die.
Click to expand...

I do exactly what I say.
I don’t add salt at all when I cook my meal for last 15 years.
I eat usually those food products: buckwheat, couscous, beans, lentils, oatmeal, tomatoes, carrots, beets, onions, garlic, persimmon, apples, melons, sunflower oil, fish, meat.
They have no salt.
I also eat bread and hens.
They have some salt.
I am absolutely sure that I can live without bread and hens.
 
Craig B said:
Eh? Have you read the Tanakh? Let's start with Numbers 31 (we'll go on to Joshua later)
13 Moses, Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp. 14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle. [against the Midianites] 15 “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them. 16 “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people. 17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man ...​
There are I think HUNDREDS of such primitive monstrosities in the Tanakh. I will cite them all one by one if you wish, in the probably vain hope that it may make you stop uttering balderdash.
Click to expand...

Those facts were the violations of the 6th Commandment: “Do not kill”.
It is one of the 10 main Laws of Torah.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I do exactly what I say.
I don’t add salt at all when I cook my meal for last 15 years.
Click to expand...
No, that wasn't what you said. You said you don't eat salt at all.

I eat usually those food products: buckwheat, couscous, beans, lentils, oatmeal, tomatoes, carrots, beets, onions, garlic, persimmon, apples, melons, sunflower oil, fish, meat.
They have no salt.
Click to expand...
Rubbish. Most of those contain salt. For example, half a cup of raw carrot contains 20 mg of salt, and the same amount of beets contains 49 mg. All kinds of fish and meat contain salt. Even some fruits (eg persimmon) do.

Look them up for yourself:

http://www.alsosalt.com/socounfo.html

You really need to stop making statements without bothering to first do any fact checking whatsoever.
 
Stuart said:
Earlier in this thread you claimed all of your food is eaten raw - which is the lie and which the truth?
Click to expand...

I can eat raw meat, raw fish, various cereals soaked in raw water, raw vegetables and fruits, raw sunflower oil.
I can eat boiled meat, boiled fish, cooked cereals, boiled fruits and vegetables, fry meal in sunflower oil.
When I want to I eat according the first variant, when I want I eat according the second variant.
Therefore, the first and second options are the real truth.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I can eat raw meat, raw fish, various cereals soaked in raw water, raw vegetables and fruits, raw sunflower oil.
I can eat boiled meat, boiled fish, cooked cereals, boiled fruits and vegetables, fry meal in sunflower oil.
When I want to I eat according the first variant, when I want I eat according the second variant.
Therefore, the first and second options are the real truth.
Click to expand...

Yes, but can you eat horse **** and sheep **** like my dog can? Because you claimed that anything a dog can eat is safe for humans.
 
Last edited:
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Those facts were the violations of the 6th Commandment: “Do not kill”.
It is one of the 10 main Laws of Torah.
Click to expand...

That law is "thou shalt not commit murder" - which is very different from "thou shalt not kill."

CraigB is citing a passage dealing with actions against a people that was apparently sanctioned by the "diety" whose "holy book" you are touting as a means of bringing peace to the world. Which is yet another example of how you have not done the basic research into your ideas - the Old Testament, New Testament and the Koran are filled with 100s of morally questionable actions by divinities and are only suitable to live a moral life from if you heavily redact them or choose to ignore portions of them.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I can eat raw meat, raw fish, various cereals soaked in raw water, raw vegetables and fruits, raw sunflower oil.
I can eat boiled meat, boiled fish, cooked cereals, boiled fruits and vegetables, fry meal in sunflower oil.
When I want to I eat according the first variant, when I want I eat according the second variant.
Therefore, the first and second options are the real truth.
Click to expand...
Ah I see you didn't lie about either you simply changed your mind about what you do. Sounds like either of my daughters (when they were about 5 years old and got caught out).
 
Craig B said:
I am not sure what you mean by all this. Greek, Latin and Aramaic are all separate languages. Greek and Latin are not descended from Aramaic. The latter is a Semitic language like Arabic or Hebrew; while Latin belongs to the western group of Indo-European languages. Aramaic was an official language in the Persian Empire, and was used by Christians as well as other people in that empire. Latin and Greek were official languages in the Roman Empire, and Christians in that empire used these languages. None of this seems surprising or mysterious to me.
Click to expand...

1 Turn on logic.
How can Latin and Greek languages which were born long before the Great Migration of Nations relate to so called “Indo-European Languages”?
How can they have their roots in Sanskrit?
These languages may have their roots only in much more ancient language - the language of Torah.
2 If people believe in God they should speak on the language of God.
This is the language of the Torah if HE it is the Israel God.
This is Aramaic language if HE is Jesus Christ.
So the peoples of the Roman Empire in the era of Constantine had to go imperatively on Aramaic language of Jesus Christ.
Just as all Muslims would have to move imperatively to a common language of the divine revelation of the Tanah - Arabic.

Because it was not done multilingual Christians and Muslims hate each other today,

It is written in Bible.
One language is the only condition of peace between people.
If this language will become English it will be much better than now.
If this language will become the Holy Resurrected Language it will be much better than English.
 
abaddon said:
so out of 7,000,000,000 people in the world you have convinced 4 or 5 and you are not sure about one of them, yet you still cling to the notion that this lunatic idea will gain any traction in the real world. Sure.

I don't believe you even about the 4-5 anyway.
Click to expand...

If you don’t believe me that 4-5 times a week I heare from very different people in Israel that I am genius, it is your problem.
If you do not understand that this fact, which has been going on steadily for the second year is the proof that in the case of favorable conditions millions of people will call me the genius, this is the problem of your intelligence.

There is a big difference when one two of your friends or relatives tell you some times that you are genius and when
the random and the strangers to you people tell you every week that you are genius.
Those people are absolutely independent from me.
 
abaddon said:
The correct word is "Hebrew". The other terms were simply fantasised into existence by you.
Click to expand...

We can say: ”Holy Resurrected Language to every God believer!”.
But we can’t say: “the Jewish language – Hebrew to every God believer!”
For because you don’t want to give the Resurrected Language of God to every God believer you use the word Hebrew that will be replace in future by the word «Holy Resurrected Language”.
 
Craig4 said:
Your great social project is just you so it's the same thing.
Click to expand...

The blockbuster you will look and you will forget it in an hour.
But my image and talking with me will remember all their life 99% of my thousands interlocutors, including you.
My project will change the lifestyle of most people in the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom