Loose Change - Part III

[DavidJames]

No, that's a guy named Mark. I refused to "correct" my work because it was he who was completely wrong (Guess what? The towers didn't fall at free-fall speed!). I told him that if he didn't correct his error on LC, I would have someone publish the entirety of our email exchange on that site. He backed down and did it for me. Just another cowardly CT.

So he made some claims in that thread which he removed after your email exchange?

 

[TheChadd]

I don't think he quite gets the idea of how fires work. I'm waiting for a firefighter or someone from the arson squad of a police department to comment on his 'experiment'.

 

[Belz...]

It wasn't that non-public. Both Public and Government officials were at ground zer. Anyone who says that people were blocked off from Ground Zero are simply lying.

Shht! Damn it, MarkyX! Now my theory doesn't make sense!! I'm going to have to add another layer of conspiracy to it!!

Actually, I was just talking about the PERCEIVED secrecy of investigations, because CTers aren't privy to it. With TV they just have to watch.

 

[JamesB]

Proving James' point, this guy became famous for his proof that wooden planes could not have crashed into a wooden World Trade Center. He's back with a scientific experiment that will both amaze and astound you. Do not miss this one! He's got photos this time!

Correction: This is an older post of his. But you will enjoy it if you haven't seen it.

What an idiot. Everyone knows the towers weren't built like chicken wire, they were built like trees. And where are his Keebler elves?

 

[60hzxtl]

If they keep this up they might just prove that the towers didn't fall at all.

Maybe they never existed. Maybe the buildings themselves were holograms.

Oh, wait, I once worked on the 74th Floor of WTC 1, (long long before 9/11) and I had to take 2 elevators to get there. (and they were NOT in "airtight" shafts Dylan!)

 

[dubfan]

Here's a funny email I got today, apparently from a LC forum member (I've left his name out, but someone with the same name posts there).


My reply:

Ah, that's "whistleblowers-are-heroes" Daniels from the LC forums, I'll bet.

I recognized his distinctive lyrical style immediately.

 

[Belz...]

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7415

How come when they get threatened that they get a news report

One thing you've got to learn from these guys : in the absence of PhDs or other titles of expertise, use the term "scholar". It looks good on a resume.

 

[CptColumbo]

One thing you've got to learn from these guys : in the absence of PhDs or other titles of expertise, use the term "scholar". It looks good on a resume.

It's like UFOlogists or Psychic Investigators. As long as it has a scientific ring to it.

 

[Gravy]

Ah, that's "whistleblowers-are-heroes" Daniels from the LC forums, I'll bet.

I recognized his distinctive lyrical style immediately.

Good eye, dubfan! You win a box of Keebler cookies. Eat 'em quick, because they burn right up in Hell.

 

[tacodaemon]

It wasn't just a criminal investigation, it was by far the largest in American history. The FBI alone had 7,000 agents on the case. Nothing has come anywhere close. The same CTs whine that the FBI took jurisdiction away from the NTSB...because it was a criminal investigation!

My favorite was the CT who was on here for a while (was it Mutton-Head?) whose apparent complaint was not that there wasn't a criminal investigation but that the investigation wasn't called "USA vs. Unknown". I still haven't figured that guy out.

 

[tacodaemon]

Proving James' point, this guy became famous for his proof that wooden planes could not have crashed into a wooden World Trade Center. He's back with a scientific experiment that will both amaze and astound you. Do not miss this one! He's got photos this time!

I'm looking forward to the CTer scientific proof that the Official Theory of the Titanic sinking can't be true because they tried throwing ice cubes against a sheet of steel and the ice didn't so much as dent the steel, let alone tear a long gouge in it.

 

[NDBoston]

invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7415

Dylan chimes in on Gravy. He's on the take. I want to get paid too!!!

can you say 'payroll'?

 

[Stellafane]

can you say 'payroll'?

Notice that the coward doesn't have the guts to come out and actually say Gravy's being paid, he just hints, so he can deny ever having said it if he's ever challenged. Just asking questions, as per his usual sleazeball tactics.

In the same spirit, here's one for Avery and all his admirers with their socially-arrested lips firmly planted on his backside: Can you say butt-ugly half-wit? I can. Shucks, I can even spell it. Here's I'll give you a hint: D-Y-L...

 

[Gravy]

Bwahaha! On that thread, NesNYC says this:

Yeah, cause Mark Roberts get on there and lies about the direction the plane is heading. This plane was heading towards Queens, that's not only an odd flight path, but it just doesn't happen every day. Planes fly around Manhattan, not cross it, ever. All the area airports are outside the lower Manhattan and have holding patterns that circle, not cross, the lower Manhattan area.

Read my reply to Mark, I think he just got OWNED.

Holy, cow, What an idiot. He obviously hadn't read my replies. He said he knew New York like the back of his hand, and I told him he needed to study his hand a lot more. What a flaming fool.

Anybody want to post this over there?
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7415

 

[Brainster]

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7415

How come when they get threatened that they get a news report

It's a PR release from PR Web--basically Fetzer submitted it and it gets on Yahoo News automatically.

Anybody really believe this guy's kids were threatened over this goofy article on the elephant plane? BTW, on the forum on that paper, I think Gravy's misspoken here:

The camera is to the west. The plane is headed north.

Isn't the camera to the east, looking roughly west? I hesitate here because my initial assumption is that if Gravy and I disagree, it's because I've made a mistake somewhere, but I did check this fairly carefully and it certainly appears to me that we're looking at the damage to the east side of the north building.

I also love MMC's insistence that's an AWACS plane. You'd think he'd look at the wing positions on the two pictures he shows and realize they cannot possibly be the same plane.

 

[Pardalis]

Ah, that's "whistleblowers-are-heroes" Daniels from the LC forums, I'll bet.

What "whistle blowers" by the way? Did I miss something?

 

[Pardalis]

My favorite was the CT who was on here for a while (was it Mutton-Head?) whose apparent complaint was not that there wasn't a criminal investigation but that the investigation wasn't called "USA vs. Unknown". I still haven't figured that guy out.

I think that was Childlike Empress.

 

[Gravy]

looking[/I] roughly west? I hesitate here because my initial assumption is that if Gravy and I disagree, it's because I've made a mistake somewhere, but I did check this fairly carefully and it certainly appears to me that we're looking at the damage to the east side of the north building.

No, you're right, I misspoke. As I said in my other posts, the camera is looking west. Haste makes waste. Thanks for the catch.

 

[Gravy]

What "whistle blowers" by the way? Did I miss something?

Well, they certainly blow. That's half the battle.

 

[Pardalis]

Well, they certainly blow. That's half the battle.

They blow and suck at the same time. They got quite an impressive lung capacity those CTers.