Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I found it odd they were talking about debris being flung out. Isn't their whole argument that it "fell into its own footprint"? Now all of a sudden it is being flung every which way.
 
JamesB said:
Yeah, I found it odd they were talking about debris being flung out. Isn't their whole argument that it "fell into its own footprint"? Now all of a sudden it is being flung every which way.
Click to expand...

If the towers aren't falling into their own footprints in a neat textbook controlled demolition, they're spraying debris for 600ft because of the explosive force of all those pre-planted bombs.
 
Gravy said:
Lots of variables to consider here. You're only using one example of CD as a representative of all, are the structures similar in construction, what type of CD was it, what structural weakening was done, when did the first charges go off, how tall was the building, are the video speeds correct, etc.
Click to expand...

Good points all, I guess I don't really have a post here, just an eyeball poke. And I've got a good one of those coming up.
 
I've just been whacked with the mod-stick over at the 9-11 studies forum.

All I did was quote verbatim a question from the annual interview that Prof. Jones needs to pass every year to keep his job.

"Are you honest in your dealings with your fellow man?"

It's a simple question with a purely binary result. You'd think a guy who claims he's been threatened by the MIBs over a paper that's been rejected by the entire faculty at his own school would be able to answer that one. ;-)
 
Pardalis said:
If it was a controlled demotion, it was a real crappy one.
Click to expand...


Clear proof that CDI was involved. Only the foremost control demolitions company in the world could make a CD look so bad that those not interested in seeking the "Truth" would think it was a normal collapse. After all what are the chances that the only 3 steel framed building to ever collapse due to fire would do so on the same day.

-PopeTom

oh and :)
 
Some genius on the LC forum thinks he has Gravy debunked. Although I am not sure how he has managed this feat, since the Pentagon doesn't come into the picture until page 25.

Decided to read through the first 2 pages of the "gravy debunk" (the pentagon and opening sequence) and do some counting, this is what I have gathered. I urge you though to read for yourself, and do your own counting, especially if you dont believe me. Also I noticed he has a habit of saying "wrong" then following up with either an opinion or a statement with no source backing up what he says or has nothing to do with the topic at hand... So I suggest doing your own research to see what is right and what is wrong.


Personal opinions: 38
No source: 41
Errors: 24
Other: 50
Click to expand...

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6881
 
LOL I didn't even notice that was you. I think the chances of getting a serious response are minimal. Some guy has been promising one for months, but I guess he is "busy".
 
JamesB said:
LOL I didn't even notice that was you. I think the chances of getting a serious response are minimal. Some guy has been promising one for months, but I guess he is "busy".
Click to expand...
i think i read that, do you mean DJ something?

where exactly can i see this gravy's guide?
 
Geez these guys are a bunch of losers. The 9/11 Scholars have this former LTC who is running for Congress. On his website he has a post which says that the Srebrenica massacre never took place. Having served in Bosnia, I found that offensive so I e-mailed him on it. I got this response.

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

[email protected]

Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17)
Click to expand...

Wow, this must be one serious congressional campaign.
 
Even more laughable Mr. Bowman asserts in a speech that real hourly wages are only 1/3 what they were in the 1950s. Hmm, I know some people who would dispute that. Like, say... every living American economist!
 
Oh, you guys will like this. You know how Webfairy and Gerard think that that out-of-focus, compression-artifacted still from the Jules Naudet video shows a "blob" (or, as Webfairy calls it, a "Whatzit") flying toward the North Tower? Well, some other woo-woo -- who is on a CIA drug-running conspiracy list with Webfairy -- took the still, blew it up big, sent it through a bunch of edge-detecting Photoshop filters, and spotted a bunch of evil faces in it that are the signature of the Reptoid aliens who are probably really at fault.
 
tacodaemon said:
Oh, you guys will like this. You know how Webfairy and Gerard think that that out-of-focus, compression-artifacted still from the Jules Naudet video shows a "blob" (or, as Webfairy calls it, a "Whatzit") flying toward the North Tower? Well, some other woo-woo -- who is on a CIA drug-running conspiracy list with Webfairy -- took the still, blew it up big, sent it through a bunch of edge-detecting Photoshop filters, and spotted a bunch of evil faces in it that are the signature of the Reptoid aliens who are probably really at fault.
Click to expand...

Humans excel in pattern finding. This does, of course, lead not only to positive hits (calling a truth a truth, calling a lie a lie) but also negative hits (calling a truth a lie, calling a lie a truth). It's a great survival trait, but sometimes it backfires.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom