Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very legitimate credentials, though. We're apparently being asked for a comment about him, but what is there to comment on? Just need to know what his objections are to the NIST report. The very brief mentions of his views about the WTC don't give any indication if he knows a lot or nothing about the investigations.
Yeah man, no need to investigate, G.

Childlike Empress said:
Nick, please tell me your opinion on shrinkers pic. Is this really excellent? True? Or what.
 
@Cylinder: In Context? Or General? Generally, there are too many believers on both sides.

@Pardalis:
990744cae12212dd4.jpg
;)
 
Last edited:
May I be offended that there are no ladies in the ninja pic?

I never get invited to the good parties.
 
Childlike, if you want to say something about 9/11, say it now, stop playing around.

9/11 ISN'T A GAME
 
May I be offended that there are no ladies in the ninja pic?
You should be offended. That's the same mentality the Al-Qaida-Boys have. With the difference that these western folks met women during their youth.

Blabla, Pardalis. I made enough points that were ignored. Researched BCCI?
 
Blabla, Pardalis. I made enough points that were ignored. Researched BCCI?


I think CTers have a uniqueness complex which fuels their ideas. Above is a classic example. Because their points aren't addressed, they assume they're ignored. It is, of course, unfathomable to them that someone else has already raised such a point long ago, the point has been looked into and found lacking.

No, that couldn't happen. They must be the first person in the universe to suggest such a notion. So if you don't do extensive research into this new exciting claim, you MUST be ignoring it.

Sorry. You haven't produced anything new.

I came into the LC thread very late in the piece. Yet even I have not seen any new arguments produced since the first couple of weeks.

It's the same old stuff, over and over and over again.

When I first joined, I believe they were talking about puffs of smoke "squibs" from the WTC collapses. I remember it clearly because a "squib" is something we use in the film industry so it stuck in my mind.

And just now, in the LC thread, someone has produced the evidence of "squibs" as a new and amazing fact.

It's not. It's old. It's boring.

-Andrew
 
I am sure that everyone who answered to my pic (except T.A.M.) read the most of my postings. You know what my stand on Loose Change is and you know that i don't believe in CD. The reason why i "mirrored" shrinkers pic is because i am beginning to lose respect for you. You (some of you) use the same tactics you accuse the "Truth Movement" of. Nick, please tell me your opinion on shrinkers pic. Is this really excellent? True? Or what. Arkan Wolfshade's thread on how "neo-nazis drive the truth movement"? Hm? Laughable.

And what about that? Isn't that the long awaited expert who is very surprised that the Towers collapsed? Totally ignored (an example - i am not convinced of CD, remember?).

Oh my. You really don't get it. What would you think if - lets say - Alex Jones, Dylan Avery and Ray McGovern get killed? That's not the way control works these days. Hm - i'm thinking about opening a new thread for that - later. I'm off for now.

edit: Hey Pardalis! :)

Hey CE, I'm sorry you don't think my picture is up to your usual standards of debate. However, you might notice that's there's been very little debate in this thread for a good while. One might almost suspect that the Loosers can't really back up their claims. If you could spell out for me what I'm doing that I accuse the CTers of, that would be nice. Mostly we accuse them of being wrong, so I guess we could start there...

Regarding your link. Prof Torero's theories and structural engineering qualifications aren't particularly clear in that article. And neither is his experiment, or its relevance to 9/11. I guess we're waiting for something 'concrete' to emerge. We're sure the CTers will provide details as they emerge. If you can't wait that long maybe you could ask him yourself - J. Torero's contact details can easy be found on the net.
 
@Gumboot: Please read at least my last five posts before you generalise.

Cylinder said:
That doesn't even make sense. You seemed to imply that the investigation of the WTC collapse was unsatisfactory. I wanted to know why.
I seemed to imply? Quote?

Pardalis said:
The Bulgarian Chamber Of Commerce And Industry? What are you talking about?
The Bank of Credit and Commerce International. Don't play dumb, Pardalis. Start here.

@shrinker: Your pic accused them of beeing wrong? Grow a backbone.
 
Pardalis, why do you allways ask others to think for you? I have no proof. How could i? I told you that i am no american, even not on the american continent. I have no coherent story to tell, Pardalis, but the official story is a joke for me. Ok?
 
I seemed to imply? Quote?

Sure.

Gravy said:
Very legitimate credentials, though. We're apparently being asked for a comment about him, but what is there to comment on? Just need to know what his objections are to the NIST report. The very brief mentions of his views about the WTC don't give any indication if he knows a lot or nothing about the investigations.

To which you reply:

Childlike Empress said:
Yeah man, no need to investigate, G.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom