Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
He dodged just about every legitimate question. If Steve Jones died, what would they do? He really likes those trees, doesn't he?

Jones is too busy tending to his closed forum flock and trying figure a way out of all the problems croping up in his paper.

I wonder how his thermite tests are coming....
 
Haha we are making Dylan Avery crack.

http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/

Yes Dylan, please post the letters that support you. Only post the ones that agree with your theory. Let's just forgot the ones you insulted and disgrace like Mark Bingham

Well, one thing's for sure, Dylan didn't write those himself (looks like he copied and pasted from emails--note the formatting problems with blogger). There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
 
Well, one thing's for sure, Dylan didn't write those himself (looks like he copied and pasted from emails--note the formatting problems with blogger). There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

He doesn't even tend the blog. Look at his myspace; the idiot doesn't even use caps.

Yes, he got himself a ghostwriter.
 
Haha we are making Dylan Avery crack.

http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/

Yes Dylan, please post the letters that support you. Only post the ones that agree with your theory. Let's just forgot the ones you insulted and disgrace like Mark Bingham

What an *******.
I'm sure he had the authors' permission to post their letters online. Amazing that the first one is supposedly from a relative of a flight 77 passenger, which Avery says did not hit the Pentagon, hence the remains that were collected there and returned to the family are not that of the author's relative. Somehow I don't think Avery mentioned that to the author. He only recently, reluctantly, admitted that there probably were passengers on any of the planes. Oh, and some of the 9/11 "victims" were actually dead before 9/11. Oh, and some of them were probably "in on it." Oh, and some of the relatives were probably also in on it. Oh, and the relatives who accepted money from the government are guilty of taking "hush money." And the passengers on flight 93? What heroics?

And the last words of all those who called from the hijacked planes and said "Tell the kids I love them?" Merely computer-generated hoaxes perpetrated by some smirking technicians in a room full of blinking hardware and cables. Do you think they high-fived each other when it was over, Dylan, for fooling all those family members?

Isn't life funny, Dylan? Who knew that your ticket out of Red Lobster would involve profiting from the unimaginable pain of strangers?

Loose Change Creators Speak
 
Jones is too busy tending to his closed forum flock and trying figure a way out of all the problems croping up in his paper.

I wonder how his thermite tests are coming....

It's been almost two weeks and he hasn't answered my e-mail.

I guess he concurs with Fetzers opinion of our fellow mormons eternal salvation?
 
It's been almost two weeks and he hasn't answered my e-mail.

I guess he concurs with Fetzers opinion of our fellow mormons eternal salvation?

At first he used to answer questions quickly. Well at least he would try.
Now I hear nothing. I wonder whats up....
 
I'm sure he had the authors' permission to post their letters online. Amazing that the first one is supposedly from a relative of a flight 77 passenger, which Avery says did not hit the Pentagon, hence the remains that were collected there and returned to the family are not that of the author's relative. Somehow I don't think Avery mentioned that to the author. He only recently, reluctantly, admitted that there probably were passengers on any of the planes. Oh, and some of the 9/11 "victims" were actually dead before 9/11. Oh, and some of them were probably "in on it." Oh, and some of the relatives were probably also in on it. Oh, and the relatives who accepted money from the government are guilty of taking "hush money." And the passengers on flight 93? What heroics?

SNIP


Isn't life funny, Dylan? Who knew that your ticket out of Red Lobster would involve profiting from the unimaginable pain of strangers?

Loose Change Creators Speak


Most of the letters he's posted are "gimme a video" letters - They are not letters from people who have seen it and are marching along holding a banner that says "inside job", or even praising the video.


Dylan's offer is a freebe to anyone who lost friends or family - I could ask for 5 copies in the most repectful way - and still want to push his head through the hole in the DVD.
 
At first he used to answer questions quickly. Well at least he would try.
Now I hear nothing. I wonder whats up....

I'm hoping he does show up at the 9-11 studies forum.

Getting him while he's out in the open may be the only way to pin him down.
 
If you ever watch videos of controlled demolitions done by the Loizeauxs, you notice that there isn't much dust created by the initial explosions.
Someone here went through the calculations of how much energy is available from just the falling mass of the building, versus that from explosives, and you'd have to have some godawful amount of explosives to match the gravitational energy from the building. So if the energy from the buildng's fall wasn't enough to cause all that dust, what did?

I'd like to see those calculations again; it would be nice thing to have handy to embarass CTs with.
 
I'm hoping he does show up at the 9-11 studies forum.

Getting him while he's out in the open may be the only way to pin him down.

It would be nice to see. I'd also like to see Griffin answer for all of his errors. Fetzer doesn't do much (or any) orginal research, so I could care less about him. But his posts are just jam packed with stupid errors.
So he does work nicely in our favor.

I would also suggest if people want to play, they should read up on the various claims made by Jones carefully.
 
Someone here went through the calculations of how much energy is available from just the falling mass of the building, versus that from explosives, and you'd have to have some godawful amount of explosives to match the gravitational energy from the building. So if the energy from the buildng's fall wasn't enough to cause all that dust, what did?

I'd like to see those calculations again; it would be nice thing to have handy to embarass CTs with.

I don't remember who did that here, but it has been done other places.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B7FEB-A88C-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21&pageNumber=3&catID=4

Kausel also reported that he had made estimates of the amount of energy generated during the collapse of each tower. "The gravitational energy of a building is like water backed up behind a dam," he explained. When released, the accumulated potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. With a mass of about 500,000 tons (5 x 108 kilograms), a height of about 1,350 ft. (411 meters), and the acceleration of gravity at 9.8 meters per second 2, he came up with a potential energy total of 1019 ergs (1012 Joules or 278 Megawatt-hours). "That's about 1 percent of the energy released by a small atomic bomb," he noted.
 
Gonna be interesting to see the CT'ers squirm over this one. It appears (I'm going just by the title of the doc) that the NIST has released the final report on WTC 7.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf

Can't d/l it right now, the server seems to be overloaded. No doubt w/ CT'ers anxious to use their impresive engineering knowledge to debunk it... :dl:
I don't believe that is it.
The final won't be out until Dec.
I believe that's from Apr 5 2005
The HTML cache
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...ollapse%20Final.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
 
Gonna be interesting to see the CT'ers squirm over this one. It appears (I'm going just by the title of the doc) that the NIST has released the final report on WTC 7.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf

Can't d/l it right now, the server seems to be overloaded. No doubt w/ CT'ers anxious to use their impresive engineering knowledge to debunk it... :dl:

It's already been pre-debunked with the following highly scientific statement:

''The NIST is controlled by the government''
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom