"Even the NIST admitted it had found sulfur residue it could not explain. I find it unreasonable that NITS would have overlooked explanations such as you suggest were they available and appropriate. "
NIST has nothing in their report about the sulfur residue. It was FEMA.
Ask him if Jones has contacted Mr Barnett from FEMA.
He was able to exaplin what he thought were the top three probably sources were quite well. And no...... none of them were thermite, nano thermite, gel-sols etc...
In fact one of them was Gyp wallboard dust. another was fuel.
"The impact of the planes was negligible, the fires burned too low and too briefly to have caused the steel to weaken much less melt, there was not enough kinetic energy for a floor's collapse to bring about another floor's collapse or for that occurrence to bring about the pulverization of the concrete flooring, plus the speed of fall--10 seconds for the South Tower, 11 for the North--even exceeded the rate of free-fall for a grand piano released in space and only affected by air resistence, which would have come down in 12 seconds!"
The buildings didn't fall in 10 or 11 sec. Why do they keep saying this?
"Not to mention the enormous pools of molten metal that were found at the subbasement level three, four, and five weeks later. For more, consult Steve."
Why couldn't their be molten pools. Does he also believe building no6 was blown up also?
"But there had to have been another source of immense energy to blow steel beams outward and even upward and create that massive cloud of very fine dust. "
Why,...and what blew up?
Fetzer continues his crappy research.....his other replys are even worse
"The debris distributed over eight square miles in Shankesville when it should have only covered a city block if the official account were correct" LOL!!! Ask him what the debris were...
