Loose Change - Part III

[SBrown]

I don't know what's funnier about the good generals remarks in that video you linked.

That he claims he can measure objects in photographs that are occluded by thick black smoke, or that he thinks a 13 foot wide 757 fueselage won't fit in the hole he thinks he saw.

A double loss for the truthers, try again Jennybelle.

Well that was his job for 30 years....but this is not my point, lets make him look like an idiot. Anyone have any dirt? Lets look up his military record I am sure he has some skeletons.

 

[Donks]

Well that was his job for 30 years....

Appeal to authority.

but this is not my point, lets make him look like an idiot. Anyone have any dirt? Lets look up his military record I am sure he has some skeletons.

Ad hominem.

 

[Kent1]

Hola good friends....

Lets start rippin this traitorous scum bag. He obviously suffers from dementia, I say we take that angle.

Lets show the woo's a thing err two.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO 4 SURE

Actually many CT'ers from 911blogger aren't big on using this guy because of his wild psychokinetic and UFO beliefs.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=general+stubblebine+psychokinetic+UFOs&btnG=Search

 

[WildCat]

Hola good friends....

Lets start rippin this traitorous scum bag. He obviously suffers from dementia, I say we take that angle.

Lets show the woo's a thing err two.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO 4 SURE

No, nothing about him says "woo". BTW, look up "remote viewing"... nope, no woo to see here...

 

[SBrown]

You still don't quite get it do you? Even if I didn't think your post was missing its [sarcasm] tags, it's still not how we approach things around here. Launching into ad hom attacks against the speaker in the film accomplishes nothing.

Showing that his claim of rank in the military is uncited/corroborated and that he provides nothing more than his opinion on the size of the hole in the Pentagon in relation to the plane does however; because those are non-scientific, logically fallacious arguments.

Wait am I not looking at a whole page here of attacks and attempts to discredit?

**edit: Page before....sorry.

 

[WildCat]

Wait am I not looking at a whole page here of attacks and attempts to discredit?

**edit: Page before....sorry.

Any structural engineers or demolition esperts on the CT side yet jenabelle?

Seriously, do you know how far out there this guy is?

 

[SBrown]

Any structural engineers or demolition esperts on the CT side yet jenabelle?

Seriously, do you know how far out there this guy is?

Is this an answer?

 

[Blackwell]

Is this an answer?

No, it's a question - you can tell by the squiggly mark with the dot at the end.

 

[DavidJames]

Good evening jenabell

When you get a chance, can you ask johndoeX to explain how he's been

in the business flying for over 20 years.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...pic=8013&st=90


When he was

in middle school i think when it happened

it being Iran Contra - which was made public in 1986 - 20 years ago.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7903

 

[SBrown]

No, it's a question - you can tell by the squiggly mark with the dot at the end.

Can you show me an example because I thought for sure he had quoted me.......was this just for effect?

 

[SBrown]

Good evening jenabell

When you get a chance, can you ask johndoeX to explain how he's been

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...pic=8013&st=90


When he was it being Iran Contra - which was made public in 1986 - 20 years ago.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7903

Ad hominem.
Next.

**Edit...though I have to give it to you DJ at least you can get my name right.

 

[Donks]

Ad hominem.
Next.

**Edit...though I have to give it to you DJ at least you can get my name right.

That's not an adhom.

 

[Hawk one]

Not an ad hominem. I think you need to find out what that means.

What you are being asked is to find out why someone makes two claims that are mutually exlusive. And it's the mutual exlusivity that's being attacked here, not the poster.

 

[SBrown]

What does "DONKS" mean?

 

[SBrown]

Not an ad hominem. I think you need to find out what that means.

What you are being asked is to find out why someone makes two claims that are mutually exlusive. And it's the mutual exlusivity that's being attacked here, not the poster.

Two claims? Is it? I am not him but is it really two claims?

 

[Donks]

What does "DONKS" mean?

It means "he who is always right."

 

[Pardalis]

What does Jenabell mean?

 

[Donks]

Two claims? Is it? I am not him but is it really two claims?

Yes.

 

[SBrown]

It means "he who is always right."

Awesome in what dialect?

 

[SBrown]

Yes.

Explain.