Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
NobbyNobbs said:
Curiouser and curiouser.

I've been fairly active on the "moon hoax" thread over at LC, because I find it simply fascinating that people don't believe we've been there, despite the mountain of evidence (which more than rivals the 911 OT evidence).

I have a theory that the thread is rapidly devolving into the following......

Me: Here's what's wrong with your theory.
Them: Yeah, well I believe it anyway!
Me: But there's a major hole in it!
Them: I don't care. I believe in it anyway. Plbbt!


The whole thing amazes me.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=4560&st=270#entry5119910
Click to expand...

And on the next page, Questy went right back to his Sirbel footage, despite it having been debunked rightin front of him. I guess he was too busy banning people to read it.
 
c4ts said:
Because they say the first moon landing was faked, the others were real, and they placed the mirrors.
Click to expand...



They do????


What the hell kind of crap is that? If we made it to the moon in 1970, why not 1969?


Or is it that we didn't have the alien tech from Roswell adapted yet?
 
Hang on: Don't these jokers claim that space radiation would kill off the crew if they tried to reach the moon unless they were surrounded by a huge amount of water or lead? How does that tie in with only the first landing being faked?!
The problems would be the same no matter WHEN the launch were!
 
fowlsound said:
They do????


What the hell kind of crap is that? If we made it to the moon in 1970, why not 1969?
Click to expand...

Oh, you know, that "end of the decade stuff" in the JFK speech.

Some others point out that the Russian robots placed retroreflectors, but they ignore the fact that they had a 50% failure rate. By comparison, all of the retroreflectors placed on the Moon are in perfect working order (and would we ever hear about it in the CT camp if they weren'!)
 
kookbreaker said:
Oh, you know, that "end of the decade stuff" in the JFK speech.

Some others point out that the Russian robots placed retroreflectors, but they ignore the fact that they had a 50% failure rate. By comparison, all of the retroreflectors placed on the Moon are in perfect working order (and would we ever hear about it in the CT camp if they weren'!)
Click to expand...



Truly that is the most dizzying pile of crap I have ever heard.
 
Kent1 said:
They're trying.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=3108&st=13425
Click to expand...
I....see....:confused:

Foxx said:
I think I can 'explain' (or at least offer a postulation as to) HOW thermite / thermate / nano-thermite CAN "pull-in" the perimeter columns.

The "gradual weakening with incendiaries" would be primarily directed at key central core columns. The location (& timing) of each individual incendiary 'cutter' would determine how long it would take before the building entered "global collapse". I wouldn't care to speculate how long the process would take, It may only take a minute or so to burn through one particular column, but if such devices (or groups of devices) were timed to ignite sequentially it could take an hour or so to complete cutting ALL the necessary core columns to the point that the entire structure would become unstable. This easily-set-up, gradual compromising of key core column cutting procedures would thus be disguised as a gradual weakening of the entire building until such time as the building could no longer support its own weight. At such time, the building would begin to collapse at its weakest point (obviously at the fire/impact damage areas). Most of the subsequent collapse would be powered then by gravity acting on the severly weakened building ... although addition charges could then be detonated sequentially throughout the gravity driven collapse to assure symmetrical compromise of secondary alternative load-paths which provided structurally redundant strengths (such as technical areas, and the increasing stronger lower columns).

Quite simple to implement, really... It is exactly the same way they 'blew-up' the real-life model building used in the Independance Day movie.
Click to expand...
It's creative. I'll give it that.
 
Pardalis said:
And he seems to have expertise in aviation. Too bad for him... Expertise is intolerated at LC.
Click to expand...

Yup...I'm a goner!!
Sorry, an error occurred. If you are unsure on how to use a feature, or don't know why you got this error message, try looking through the help files for more information.

The error returned was:

Sorry, you are not permitted to use this board
Click to expand...

Just when I thought I was getting some traction.... :dl:


....naw...just kidding on the traction thingy.

So...do I still get to be a ninja?

-z
 
Man! I can't even lurk there now...they blocked my IP. The only thing impressive about LC is the lengths that they will go to to keep that comfy wool lodged firmly over their eye-holes.

sheesh!

-z
 
rikzilla said:
So...do I still get to be a ninja?

-z
Click to expand...
Not only that, but you've earned a merit badge, courtesy of Shrinker:

3617447af0dad1e6c.jpg
 
rikzilla said:
Yup...I'm a goner!!


Just when I thought I was getting some traction.... :dl:


....naw...just kidding on the traction thingy.

So...do I still get to be a ninja?

-z
Click to expand...


Quick and dirty, but I couldn't resist

ninjaz.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom