http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5082
Gravy's article is all unsourced quotes, personal opinions, and weak attempts at being a smart ass...
Its pretty sad some of you are still defending an article that has all of the qualities that you bash LC for.
Most of what he "Debunks" is the errors that Dylan already admitted to. Besides that how do we even know if 80% of his facts are real, he has no sources then the rest is personal opinion....
Gravy doesnt come close to doing anything except making himself look like a sarcastic tool.
I suppose, but my feeling would be that the obvious answer would be that Gravy did not accomplish what he set out to do, because all of the BS in his peice for one cant be proven because he doesnt list sources and in maily opinions, and for 2 people cant take hypocrites like him seriously enough to want to look into the validity of the peice.
Its a VERY VERY poorly done article and people come on this board posting it like it is the skeptics bible...but yet in contains everything that you hate LC for...
So...What is that article supposed to accomplish?...Since it is LC's mirrored but evil twin....