Loose Change - Part II

[Hawk one]

The CTs always leave flight 93's destination out of that equation. Wonder why?

Not really, no. I have long stopped wondering why they do anything they do, really.

 

[Manny]

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5112&view=findpost&p=4885549 :

Anyways, me and Dylan might have proof that the NYPD is covering up a MAJOR incident that took place on 9/11. We need a few more details, but needless to say, the Police transmissions that took place, are then changed by the Transportation authority about what really happened and the NYPD didn't release the Radio transmissions with the rest of them that were ordered to be released earlier this year.

It's an unfolding story, but it shows that maybe even the LOCAL police and FDNY were being pressured to keep certain things under wraps and cover it things up.

So the statement that they FDNY were in on it...maybe be an EXTREME staement because OBVIOUSLY they weren't part of the plan, but after the fact, they may have been told to hide some things.

Is this their big NYPD coverup? It was the Joooooos! Yeah, couldn't see that one coming. It was so visible the top of it appeared over the horizon before the bottom did.

 

[dubfan]

dubfan, sorry for the delay (In a useless meeting all day) but your reply to chucklehead has been posted.

No problemo. Thank you.

 

[Polaris]

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5091&st=180
I like this bit from Avery:



What an [rule8]! Not only is he trying to make us believe these are "honorable charities" he gave the money to, but he's also giving crucial information to the lawyers! How lame can a person get?

At least he could have donated this money to the families of the 9/11 victims!

That's the same Russ Pickering who thinks Loose Change is government misinformation, btw.

 

[JamesB]

I phrased that badly, I managed to get banned from their forum, before I had a chance to even post in this forum, since being a member here pretty much guarantees you being bannished from the Loose Change Forum.

They started a thread on the subject of our blog, but when I posted on it commenting on it, they immediately banned both Brainster and I, from commenting on our own blog!

 

[WildCat]

I phrased that badly, I managed to get banned from their forum, before I had a chance to even post in this forum, since being a member here pretty much guarantees you being bannished from the Loose Change Forum.

They started a thread on the subject of our blog, but when I posted on it commenting on it, they immediately banned both Brainster and I, from commenting on our own blog!

Sorry if I missed it, but what blog?

 

[dissonance]

I think he's referring to the Screw Loose Change blog?

 

[WildCat]

Is this their big NYPD coverup? It was the Joooooos! Yeah, couldn't see that one coming. It was so visible the top of it appeared over the horizon before the bottom did.

That is the the nuttiest idea ever... so the Mossad would actually paint a mural of the attack on a truck and drive it to the scene? To plant box cutters!? Just nuts...

 

[Polaris]

Actually, the more I look at that pic, the more it feels familiar to me. Like I've seen it before in some kind of beer ad or other well known cheesecake shot.

Am I being a good skeptic by saying that it's possible that JessicaJohnstone "borrowed" it from somewhere, or am I just paranoid?

Those are probably the lame throwaway pics in every page of nudie thumbnails on free porn sites (yeah, I look, so what?). I see them all the time cut and pasted as Myspace pictures. My guess is that she probably will have Raven Riley or Mindy Vega on her ass soon.

Actually, I'd watch that.

 

[Hutch]

Probably going to suspension hell for this, but I simply couldn't resist...

QUOTE (Pablo @ May 30 2006, 08:53 AM)
Have only just realised but I have no idea why the film is called Loose Change. Anyone know?

Hutch reply:
Because Loose Marbles was already taken?





C'mon, that was so obvious a setup line that somebody had to use it--and you characters can't possibly be that touchy...

 

[Polaris]

Whenever they're asked about it, they usually rely on "CIA armed and trained BenLaden so that makes him part but not the head honcho of the conspiracy".

Which proves that none of them have ever actually read a book about al-Qaida and bin Laden in their lives.

 

[Polaris]

Psychological question here... I wonder how much of this is some kind of wish-fulfillment working itself out. I mean, they want desperately to believe in this big government conspiracy, where they (the CTs) are the guardians of truth and are being "silenced" by the government...

The way things are going, before long they're going to have a whole army of lawyers, the FDNY, NYPD, Port Authority, and who knows who else on their case... And then they're going to REALLY feel validated.

As a matter of fact, it sounds eerily like the MO of traditional terrorist groups. The average folks don't think the evil "they" are worth actually fighting, so the terrorists anger "them" until "they" hit back. Then the terrorists can say "SEE!!" This would also (maybe) go a step toward explaining why they can't see al-Qaida being responsible for their atrocities.

 

[Kage]

I'm wondering what their 3rd edition will be like. What if they removed everything that was garbage or misleading or patently false? Oh, sorry. That would be a video consisting of:

Opening credits,

Statement about how the WTC and a portion of the Pentagon was destroyed on 9/11, with no pictures.

Ending Credits

I'd like to thank the people on this thread for helping me talk a friend out of believing loose change (again!). Just goes to show that a degree from the top university in the nation doesn't prevent you from being drawn in by these hucksters.

 

[60hzxtl]

I'm wondering what their 3rd edition will be like. What if they removed everything that was garbage or misleading or patently false? Oh, sorry. That would be a video consisting of:

Opening credits,

Statement about how the WTC and a portion of the Pentagon was destroyed on 9/11, with no pictures.

Ending Credits

I'd like to thank the people on this thread for helping me talk a friend out of believing loose change (again!). Just goes to show that a degree from the top university in the nation doesn't prevent you from being drawn in by these hucksters.

We call that a Radio Show.

 

[Brainster]

I phrased that badly, I managed to get banned from their forum, before I had a chance to even post in this forum, since being a member here pretty much guarantees you being bannished from the Loose Change Forum.

They started a thread on the subject of our blog, but when I posted on it commenting on it, they immediately banned both Brainster and I, from commenting on our own blog!

Yes, this is about Screw Loose Change. What James means to say is that we were banned from commenting on their post concerning SCL. It was especially galling because a couple of the Loosers came over and goaded us in our comments section to reply on their turf. Within 5 posts or so, one of the Admins had banned me for refusing to respond to his challenge, which concerned some weird article from the Washington Times in 1989 about a boy pedophile ring in the Reagan/Bush White House. It was classic trolling behavior--don't comment on the subject at hand, demand comment on a completely unrelated topic--and I told the guy to focus on Loose Change. Banned until August 8. You can see the exchange in the Skeptics forum post on "Screw Loose Change"--one of the 3-4 earliest posts in that forum.

Pat from Screw Loose Change

 

[Gravy]

I'm wondering what their 3rd edition will be like. What if they removed everything that was garbage or misleading or patently false? Oh, sorry. That would be a video consisting of:
Opening credits,
Statement about how the WTC and a portion of the Pentagon was destroyed on 9/11, with no pictures.
Ending Credits...

Actually, I have the exact text of what that movie would be, but it's really, really dull, with 1/3 of the original text missing. (That's just deleting the sentences with actual false or misleading statements, not the entire stories that are false or misleading.)

 

[Twilek]

Man, after reading nearly 20 pages in here today it feels like my brain grew legs, jumped out of my skull and went for a 4-hour jog around the city. Whew...I'm literally spent!

Nevertheless, I still have the energy to "LMAO" at the lawsuit development (I was wondering how long it would take before somebody mentioned or used in LC found a legal reason to go after his idiotic butt), with plenty left over for chuckles at Shinker's badge every time he posts it. Hehehehehe.... LOVE it!

 

[WildCat]

Oh my...

Yea, there like 5 people from jref that used to post here and made all these guy cry, so now whenever anyone comes here thats skeptical of LC that are labeled as being members of JREF. jref is a forum for ghost busters or some gay **** like that.

Can't win 'em all!

 

[CptColumbo]

Email them. Include a description of the "movie" and what were illegally copied.

I think contacting Universal, whom bought Geffen, should do the trick in regards to Joes Appartment.

Universal Pictures
http://www.universalpictures.com/

COntact info:
http://www.universalstudios.com/homepage/html/contact_us/contact_links.html


Can't seem to locate their snailmail......

Universal Studios
818-777-1000 Fax: 818-866-1516
100 Universal City Plz
Universal City, CA 91608

Warner Brothers Studios
818-954-6000
4000 Warner Blvd.
Burbank, CA 91522

MTV Networks Inc
310-752-8000
2600 Colorado Ave
Santa Monica, CA

These are the interested parties. Sorry I didn't add them with my previous post.

 

[Gravy]

There's an interesting interview with Stacey Loizeaux of Controlled Demolitions, Inc. on NOVA's website. They have an upcoming program about explosives called "Kaboom."
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/kaboom/loizeaux.html

Note the use of the term "Pull," which is used in demolitions, but not in the way the CTs think.

ETA: the interview is from 1996.