Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Regnad Kcin said:
Dear Conspiracy Theorist:

You are 100% wrong.

Love,

RK
Click to expand...
Rk, this seems to be a damn poor way to welcome a new poster. Sure, he may have proven himself a nutter elsewhere, but I have not been "elsewhere" so have no preconceived notion; I suspect the same is true for most others on this forum. If he is "100% wrong" welcome him with open arms and let the facts fall where they may. Let the EVIDENCE prove him "100% wrong". Your "welcome" is anything but. Sure we're skeptics but let the sketicism work, not your harsh prejudgement.
 
Gravy said:
It's an Excel spreadsheet, and the link to it is in my signature below.
Click to expand...
Why did you put it in your sig? I have sigs turned off so can't get at it. Why not just imbed the link in your post? With the link in your sig, it will show up in Humor, Forum Management, or wherever else you may post. It will be irrelevant there. But putting it in your post will attrack the attention of those who are reading this thread and, thusly, really interested.
 
SezMe said:
Why did you put it in your sig? I have sigs turned off so can't get at it. Why not just imbed the link in your post? With the link in your sig, it will show up in Humor, Forum Management, or wherever else you may post. It will be irrelevant there. But putting it in your post will attrack the attention of those who are reading this thread and, thusly, really interested.
Click to expand...


Conversely, I also show up in humor, forum management and wherever else and am rather irrelevent there too.
 
dubfan said:
Me too. Not sure what I did (or didn't do) to warrant the lesser punishment, though.

ETA: looks like an IP ban, too.
Click to expand...

Looks like their little dictator instincts kicked in again.

I expect Hutch and Claus to be banned by the end of the day.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
It's reaching critical mass over there. I fully expect massive bannings of everyone that does not follow the Gospel of Dylan in the near future.
Click to expand...

I want my million from Randi! :D

Mine's just an account ban, not an IP ban (or at least not my home IP, find out if my work IP is banned when I get there)
 
Pardalis said:
Man, I can't watch this junk, this is torture! Forget it, I can't do it.

Chuck, why don't you raise a specific question regarding 9/11 and we'll try our best to debate it, because this is indeed a discussion forum, not a boxing arena. I'm afraid your "challenge" to watch all these "movies" is just humanly impossible to accomplish. You win. It's too horribly wrong and insane.
Click to expand...

Maybe it's like that movie "The Circle", and your brain will explode in seven days if you don't make copies and distribute it...

No, I'm sure that's not true. Try not to think about it. ;)
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
I want my million from Randi! :D

Mine's just an account ban, not an IP ban (or at least not my home IP, find out if my work IP is banned when I get there)
Click to expand...
I wonder what our new (and very welcome) guest, chucksheen has to say about this?

Chucksheen, what is the real-life equivalent of a forum account suspension? If the US government were comprised entirely of LC forum moderators, what would happen to people who engaged in political debate?
 
SezMe said:
Why did you put it in your sig? I have sigs turned off so can't get at it. Why not just imbed the link in your post? With the link in your sig, it will show up in Humor, Forum Management, or wherever else you may post. It will be irrelevant there. But putting it in your post will attrack the attention of those who are reading this thread and, thusly, really interested.
Click to expand...
I'll admit I forgot that the sigs could be turned off. If I get more requests I'll reconsider what I've done. Here's why I posted the link in my sig:

Visibility: I've made 716 posts. If anyone, from here or via any search engine, goes to any post of mine, they'll see the links in my sig.

Flexibility: I've already revised the document twice, and plan to do so weekly.

Portability: I like to think that the documents I link to, and the reasons that I created them, are relevant wherever I post on this forum, and I hope others pick up on the idea. For instance, since you mentioned it, I'd love to see someone's personal "best of the Humor subforum."

I like the way this forum is organized, and I like its ease of use. My dream forum would include the option for a poster to enter more metadata (category, subject, keywords, etc.) as well as for a reader to be able to flag favorite posts, so that everything could be sorted like a database and we could each have a favorites list in any category or thread.
 
Kiwiwriter said:
The real problem, as I see it, is that thanks to Vietnam, Watergate, and the scandals since then, we now have whole generations of intelligent people in the United States, who simply do not believe anything authority tells them. They are completely cynicized, regard everything but urban legends, conspiracy theories, and Comedy Central as being part of some grand conspiracy, and nothing but liars.

They don't trust anybody...except their psychic. :boggled:
Click to expand...

Nice post, man. Welcome.
 
So that's three JREF bans in one day at LC? Does anyone have any idea why? Did group 2 forget to stay after class?

By the way, does anyone expect chucksheen to show up here again to actually discuss anything? I certainly don't.
 
kookbreaker said:
Looks like their little dictator instincts kicked in again.

I expect Hutch and Claus to be banned by the end of the day.
Click to expand...

Well, as of 0630 CST Thursday, I am still in there; maybe because I have been nibbling around the edges and haven't gone head-to-head on any of the big-ticket items.

We shall see.
 
Gravy said:
So that's three JREF bans in one day at LC? Does anyone have any idea why? Did group 2 forget to stay after class?

By the way, does anyone expect chucksheen to show up here again to actually discuss anything? I certainly don't.
Click to expand...

Mu. He'll brag at LCf (1) we won't "watch the movies and learn the truth".
 
chucksheen said:
I challenge any rational, reasonable, critical thinker here.

Here is the challenge should you accept:

a) Visit UniversalSeed.org
b) Watch all documentaries and get informed
c) Form an opinion
d) Respond and THEN debunk the claims

Practice tollerance. Character assasination attempts help no one. I am looking for informed, honest, researched discussion. I have looked at all the information put forth advocating the official story. If you have smoking guns I will be willing to listen to you AFTER you watch the documentaries/films.

UniversalSeed.org, for all your truth needs. If you're not appalled, you're not paying attention. Wilfull ignorance and childish naivity is like blood to the coyotes, we can smell/taste the ignorance.
Click to expand...

What's your point, really ?
 
chucksheen said:
I challenge any rational, reasonable, critical thinker here.

Here is the challenge should you accept:

a) Visit UniversalSeed.org
b) Watch all documentaries and get informed
c) Form an opinion
d) Respond and THEN debunk the claims

Practice tollerance. Character assasination attempts help no one. I am looking for informed, honest, researched discussion. I have looked at all the information put forth advocating the official story. If you have smoking guns I will be willing to listen to you AFTER you watch the documentaries/films.

UniversalSeed.org, for all your truth needs. If you're not appalled, you're not paying attention. Wilfull ignorance and childish naivity is like blood to the coyotes, we can smell/taste the ignorance.
Click to expand...
Chuck, this is not the way things work around here. This is not a movie critic forum - it's a forum for debating facts and forming opinions based on those facts that pass muster.

You've done what every other Loose Change afficiendo has done, which is simply to post links to movies, conspiracy web sites, and threads in conspiracy forums. That dog don't hunt here.

I've lurked on the LC forum enough to know that there probably aren't 2 people there who agree on a single conspiracy theory - pod or no pod? Missile or drone? Bombs or thermite? Etc etc...

So, why don't you stick around here and argue your beliefs in your own words. You will not be banned here simply for disagreeing, a far cry from the LC forum.

So how about you post your theory of what happened on 9/11, and the reasons why you think so. Then we have a starting point for a debate.

Good luck!
 
kookbreaker said:
It looks like Gravy is really, really getting to poor old Dylan.

http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/2006/05/do-something.html

Now he has to refer to 'sekrit nowlege' to back up his laughable arguements.
Click to expand...
Haha!This is great news, poor little Dylan!
Dylan Avery said:
Stop bitching about our movie, and make your own. Prove us wrong, instead of relying on petty insults and ridiculous assumptions about three people you know nothing about, except maybe our names.
Click to expand...
Now that is rich! What is it w/ these people and movies? Does everything have to be in movie form to be admissable as evidence?
Dylan Avery said:
If you really want somewhere to shoot your mouth off, again, that's what the forums are for. Go nuts.
Click to expand...
Perhaps we have the reason for the recent suspensions there?
 
kookbreaker said:
It looks like Gravy is really, really getting to poor old Dylan.
http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/2006/05/do-something.html
Now he has to refer to 'sekrit nowlege' to back up his laughable arguements.
Click to expand...
From Avery's blog
If you guys really knew what went on behind the scenes 24-7, and if you actually took the time to meet us in person before drawing conclusions about us or our work, then your assinine websites and your "Viewer Guides" would drop off the radar pretty damn quick.
Click to expand...
Dylan, you're forgetting two things:

1) I asked you guys in person (I asked Bermas while you were there), "Do you stand behind your work?" He said "Damn right." So what's this about "drawing conclusions?" Since we aren't in your inner sanctum, on what should we base our conclusions if not on the work that you produce, feverishly promote, and boast about?

2) I REQUESTED a meeting with you before your last visit to New York. Why didn't you respond? If you can show me that you've taken a drastic turn towards producing valid work, I think I can be influential in changing people's minds here.

I'm posting this here because you haven't responded to my emails, your mods have banned me from your site (although I broke no rules), and you no longer allow comments on your blog.

Here's something to think about: I never would have produced my "Viewer's Guide" if your website allowed free discussion. In the past few hours three more JREF people have been banned from that site. Perhaps you can explain how this is in keeping with a search for knowledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom