Ivor the Engineer
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Messages
- 10,584
No, what got it into trouble was having a lot of its debt denominated in US dollars.The tricky part is knowing what resources are actually available. That's how Venezuela got into trouble.
We have the OBR in the UK. Unfortunately it currently uses neoclassical thinking. However, to give some idea of its clout, when Truss didn't wait for it to assess her spending plans she had to eventually resign as PM after trying to hang on by sacking her chancellor of the exchequer.How do you know it would be? And if you do know, how do you deal with all the people who don't believe you?
What the government spends money on has both a political and economic dimension. The independent body can give its assessment of the likely economic effects of government spending, such inflation and growth, and leave the moral arguments to politicians.Also how does this address the problem of what the spending is for? Last year the US Federal government spent 47% of its discretionary budget on defense, and a further 8% on veterans benefits. That means more that half goes to the military, dwarfing other things such as health (7%) and education (4%). So the problem isn't so much how much is being spent as what it's being spent on. How does your independent body address this? The answer, it can't without being political and therefore not independent.