Lindsay Lohan: Wanted Fugitive

Theoretically, it might have been a case where a third party unknowingly put the necklace on L.L. before she walked out. That would account for all the facts in evidence and still allow her to be innocent.

I am going to somewhat agree with Vortigern99. It would be more appropriate to use the word allegedly when discussing the matter.

Yes, it's also possible that fairies snuck it into her jewelry box when she wasn't looking.
 
And what is this supposed to mean? That Austin is a hotbed of drug addiction and alcohol abuse? Can you cite some evidence to back this up, or were you just insulting an entire city based on your own irrational prejudices?

Whoa! Settle down Beavis. I'm pretty sure he was making a little funny.
 
It is also possible that LL had a verbal agreement with someone that she believed to be authorized to allow the necklace to be borrowed.

Or that she believed she was in a verbal agreement due to a miscommunication.

The light fingers scenario is also plausible, but in court it must be proven and even in general discussion it is far from the only reasonable scenario.
I'd ne more likely to believe, if her damn story didn't change daily...
 
I'd ne more likely to believe, if her damn story didn't change daily...

Haven't you ever met someone who couldn't get a story straight--to the point of constantly lying, sometimes--even when they bore no guilt?

I've seen it all too often. Causes endless drama between my stepdaughter and her friends.

Add a hired publicist to the mix and it can only get worse.
 
Her lawyer is now saying that should be no felony charge cause the necklace was not worth as much as the store was charging. Sounds pretty damn desperate to me.
The attorney here at work heard that and laughed her head off.
 
Last edited:
Don't think it would save ms. Lohan, but it is an interesting question. If I put a $2000 price tag on a shoe box, and someone steals it, is that grand theft?
 
Don't think it would save ms. Lohan, but it is an interesting question. If I put a $2000 price tag on a shoe box, and someone steals it, is that grand theft?

If you could prove that $2000 was a common value for Shoeboxes, yes.
 
If you plead guilty at arraignment the judge sentences you right there or at another date; there is no room for negotiation. You are at the judge's mercy. Which is why almost nobody pleads guilty at arraignment, especially for felonies.
 
If you plead guilty at arraignment the judge sentences you right there or at another date; there is no room for negotiation. You are at the judge's mercy. Which is why almost nobody pleads guilty at arraignment, especially for felonies.

Exactly.
 
Killer concept:

Use the CCTV system of the prison to shoot a chicks in chains reality soap.

America's prison system being privatised, that should be possible.
 
If you plead guilty at arraignment the judge sentences you right there or at another date; there is no room for negotiation. You are at the judge's mercy. Which is why almost nobody pleads guilty at arraignment, especially for felonies.

I feel bad for a neighbor of mine who is charged with assault. He says that he didn't do it, but either he didn't understand or wasn't properly explained that if he goes for a no contest plea, he gives up the chance to argue "I didn't do it". If he wanted to make that his case, he needed to plead not guilty.
 

Back
Top Bottom