LC Questions JREF credentials

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I wonder if poor William watched LC:FC & LC:SE?

And what about that 3rd LC film Dylan wants out so badly? It's hard to believe that it takes 3 tries to get the "truth" out when you only needed 1 to begin with.

3 strikes & LC is out!

 

[jaydeehess]

I for one fight the TM because I simply cannot stand by while people propigate idiocy and claim it is science.

How can one just allow the ravings of such as Killtown or Hayduke to go unchallenged? How can one allow the illogic of Lyte Trip's flyover senario to go unchallenged?
How can one allow the so-bad-its-worse-than-wrong physics explanations of the collapses of the WTC buildings that one sees on youtube to go unchallenged?
How can one allow quote mining and out of context references to go unchallenged?

I can't.
William Rea, it seems , would believe we should.

 

[jaydeehess]

BTW, the term "Final Cut", do they realize that is a proprietary name of a video editing system? Makes the title seem odd to me.

 

[T.A.M.]

They have nothing to fear, as the software is "Final Cut PRO", and there is nothing "PRO" about LC...lol

TAM

 

[Architect]

LC questioning credentials? Don't make me laugh. I've challenged plenty of them to discuss technical issues in depth and not one has ever been willing or able to do so.


Well, in all fairness, there was one chap on LC who wanted to discuss collapse patterns sensibly but I got banned before we could pursue it.

But APART from him.....

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Well, in all fairness, there was one chap on LC who wanted to discuss collapse patterns sensibly but I got banned before we could pursue it.

But APART from him.....

Awfully suspicious, if you ask me. Someone knowledgeable about architecture is about to have a "public" debate, but he's "offed" before it could take place! Someone was afraid of something. I smell a conspiracy!

 

[Drudgewire]

They have nothing to fear, as the software is "Final Cut PRO", and there is nothing "PRO" about LC...lol

There's still Pink Floyd and whatever studio was dumb enough to release that terrible Robin Williams movie to deal with.

 

[jaydeehess]

LC questioning credentials? Don't make me laugh. I've challenged plenty of them to discuss technical issues in depth and not one has ever been willing or able to do so.


Well, in all fairness, there was one chap on LC who wanted to discuss collapse patterns sensibly but I got banned before we could pursue it.

But APART from him.....

Which brings us around to the inescapable fact that LC and PfT are so very quick on the ban button for anyone who disagrees with the basic premise that 9/11 was an inside job. It really matters little to them what anyone's credentilas are or whether or not their arguement is backed by accepted technical or scientific reasoning. What matters above all else is that one toe the party line on LC and especially PfT otherwise you are banned. In fact they will go further than a simple ban on posting. They disallow a banned poster from even viewing the forum. There are ways around that of course by using a proxy site but it illustrates a very real paranoia concerning those who dissent from their POV. Some, Rob Balsamo for instance , even go so far as to call for physical harm up to and including execution of some who disagree with them.