LC Questions JREF credentials

[Horatius]

If I am not mistaken, someone imported a "whining baby smiley" for William Rea. It is, nearly universally, the appropriate response to his posts.

Yeah, when he was posting allegedly "logical" "rebuttals" to the Stundies, it was at least entertaining to completely demolish his arguments and demonstrate his prevarications, but now he seems to have given up, and is just posting tripe.

I guess we were too much for him.

 

[Checkmite]

I think LC is just miffed that we consider their "truth" to be on par with stories of alien abduction, or trips to the "interior of the Hollow Earth". Dylan is just another Sylvia Browne here.

The JREF was around a long time before LC, and a long time even before 9/11.

 

[stateofgrace]

Aaaah when logic fails try good ole appeal to emotion. Welcome, I was expecting you but you are rather early.

Hmmm, you brought a friend Zep, how nice. I'll set another plate at the table.

Oh dear, I've hit a sore spot so Doc, mince et al have decided to throw their toys.

Hypocrite, take the plank from your own eye before you remove the splinter from anyone elses.

ROFLOL seriously, you're complaining to me about being taken out of context. Welcome to my world Doc, let's see if you can take the dirt that you find it so easy to deal out.

I am convinced that if the "nutters" on both sides were brought to book and removed then the sensible people could work this out. The problem is that the moderates on both sides will not deal with thier idiots.

That said the idiots do keep me entertained.

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

Indeed William.

You always remain cool,detached, in control and never resort to anything outside of logic do you William?

 

[Mobyseven]

Yeah, when he was posting allegedly "logical" "rebuttals" to the Stundies, it was at least entertaining to completely demolish his arguments and demonstrate his prevarications, but now he seems to have given up, and is just posting tripe.

I guess we were too much for him.

Ah, the good old days when my blood pressure was higher than my IQ, and my IQ was higher than a truther...

 

[Par]

Oh dear, I've hit a sore spot so Doc, mince et al have decided to throw their toys.

Hypocrite, take the plank from your own eye before you remove the splinter from anyone elses.

I’ll tell you what, you say something to me – anything – and I’ll say something in reply – also anything – and then you can say “Looks like I hit a sore spot!” We can do it a number of times if you'd like, and each time you can claim to have done something terribly unfortunate to me. Hopefully then, you’ll be happy and I’ll be about the same.

 

[Mr. Skinny]

(snip)
There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

It probably wouldn't reflect upon us well, were we a organized professional organization.

The "Stundies" probably wouldn't reflect upon us well, either, were we a organized professional organization.

But we're not. As it is, people here have the right to express their opinion and inject their form of humor.

William, I think the fact that you expect us to live up to some invisible code sorta makes me think that, deep in your heart, you know that the JREF'ers are a large pool of professional talent and that perhaps you expect us to live up to some undefined code of ethics.

Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but I do agree with others that your "tone of voice" is kinda whingy and approaching trollish.

 

[The Doc]

Oh dear, I've hit a sore spot so Doc, mince et al have decided to throw their toys.

Hypocrite, take the plank from your own eye before you remove the splinter from anyone elses.

Thank you for proving my point. You have nothing to add to this debate, you are never willing to defend your position, and you have just dodged my question.

Again, the conspiracy theorists are directing all their energy at "JREFers" and "Debunkers", when they think the government (unrelated to JREFers and debunkers) was responsible for the attacks.

Us, the debunkers, are directing our energy at the conspiracy theorists, when we think that the conspiracy theorists are responsible for spreading all this garbage science and myths over the internet. We have our priorities right.

ROFLOL seriously, you're complaining to me about being taken out of context. Welcome to my world Doc, let's see if you can take the dirt that you find it so easy to deal out.

Thank you for proving my point, and admitting that you took me out of context.

 

[The Doc]

Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but I do agree with others that your "tone of voice" is kinda whingy and approaching trollish.

No, you're reading him right. William's been whining and complaining here for quite a while now. Hopefully one day he'll take a side of this debate and defend his position instead of resorting to ad hominem arguments and personal attacks.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

You know... Given your almost-obsessive crusade to cast anything JREF in a bad light, I'm pretty sure you're mischaracterizing whatever thread that may be. I've never seen any celebration or awards given for purposefully getting banned.

Most of the awards I've seen given out were to people who posted verifiable information, or even hard math, in refutation of stupid truther claims on LCF... and got banned for it.

My only post on LCF was relatively inflammatory and I was banned in under 3 minutes. Some people were "impressed", claiming it had to have been some kind of record (although it turned out not to be), but I was never given a badge.

So, William... what is your obsession with making "us" look bad? You don't feebly attempt to hold the truthers' feet to the fire, do you?

 

[T.A.M.]

Speaking of the OP, LCF, and PFT, seems a poster over at LCF by the name of Tx Guy has wrought some havoc for both sides...lol

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13315&st=0&#entry14322601

and has sparked Robbie over at PFT to call Dylans site a "govt loyalist site"...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=8196

oh my the mayhem

TAM

 

[hellaeon]

William, I dont want to add to the chorous here as your under fire, but do you find it alarming that anything that disagrees with the 9/11 CT's by default becomes part of the conspiracy?

I would expect a better outcome for those in that movement would be to actually agree on a theory, find the right avenues and go from there. Instead they embrace anything no matter how absurd and then attack anyone or anything that dares to oppose it. Within the movement no theory stands to scientific scrutiny, yet they dont pick or choose theories based on that, they do it based on the status quo within the movement. Thats not science, its politics.

I seem to notice that the more absurd the theory, the louder it is sung and defended.

Also, dont feel compelled to answer either, its more food for thought, but respond if you like.

 

[Travis]

Speaking of the OP, LCF, and PFT, seems a poster over at LCF by the name of Tx Guy has wrought some havoc for both sides...lol

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13315&st=0&#entry14322601

and has sparked Robbie over at PFT to call Dylans site a "govt loyalist site"...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=8196

oh my the mayhem

TAM

TX Guy is our own Enigma.

Unless I'm wrong.
Or right about being wrong, in which case I'm partially right anyways...

...at least right about being wrong.


You'd think that the Truthers baseless accusations against each other about being in the NWO would help them see just how stupid their accusations about JREF being part of the NWO are.

 

[LashL]

Speaking of the OP, LCF, and PFT, seems a poster over at LCF by the name of Tx Guy has wrought some havoc for both sides...lol

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13315&st=0&#entry14322601

and has sparked Robbie over at PFT to call Dylans site a "govt loyalist site"...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=8196

oh my the mayhem

TAM

Tx Guy is ~enigma~ here. It's no secret. Do-over knows who he is and knows that he's the only one who was willing and able to disseminate the sooper sekrit floor plans when Do-Over was all atwitter about having obtained that earth-shattering information that was bigger than Christmas, birthdays, Easter, and the Tooth Fairy all combined, etc., but Do-Over didn't know how to disseminate the docs himself, and none of the twoofers could manage to do so, either. (And which turned out to be anti-climatic, anyway). But the point was that a skeptic was the only one who was willing and able to help Do-Over get his earth-shattering news out to the masses of twoofers - the twoofers didn't have a clue or the ability to do it on their own.

Oh, and here's a gem from that thread you linked to at PffffT.

It just gets frustrating that when I'm out trying to educate people I'm always getting ignored and spit at. Spitting at someone is against the law and law enforcement just turns their back. The liquidy saliva isn't so bad. It's the snotty goobers that make me mad as hell. Its gross.

I have no idea if it's the same LUCUS as the one at LCF, but it's a hilarious post, nonetheless.

 

[Hokulele]

Tx Guy is ~enigma~ here. It's no secret. Do-over knows who he is and knows that he's the only one who was willing and able to disseminate the sooper sekrit floor plans when Do-Over was all atwitter about having obtained that earth-shattering information that was bigger than Christmas, birthdays, Easter, and the Tooth Fairy all combined, etc., but Do-Over didn't know how to disseminate the docs himself, and none of the twoofers could manage to do so, either. (And which turned out to be anti-climatic, anyway). But the point was that a skeptic was the only one who was willing and able to help Do-Over get his earth-shattering news out to the masses of twoofers - the twoofers didn't have a clue or the ability to do it on their own.

Oh, and here's a gem from that thread you linked to at PffffT.



I have no idea if it's the same LUCUS as the one at LCF, but it's a hilarious post, nonetheless.

So does that mean his new nick is MUCUS?

 

[LashL]

So does that mean his new nick is MUCUS?

If (s)not, it should be.

 

[qarnos]

Speaking of the OP, LCF, and PFT, seems a poster over at LCF by the name of Tx Guy has wrought some havoc for both sides...lol

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13315&st=0&#entry14322601

and has sparked Robbie over at PFT to call Dylans site a "govt loyalist site"...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=8196

oh my the mayhem

TAM

According to the LCF thread, Rob has set up the forum to replace "JREFers" with "govt loyalists", so he probably meant to say JREFers (ironic, eh?).

I also have doubts about LUCUS at PfT being LCF's LUCUS.

 

[Gravy]

Speaking of the OP, LCF, and PFT, seems a poster over at LCF by the name of Tx Guy has wrought some havoc for both sides...lol

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13315&st=0&#entry14322601

and has sparked Robbie over at PFT to call Dylans site a "govt loyalist site"...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=8196

oh my the mayhem

TAM

Of course LC is a government loyalist site. Hell, Korey Rowe works for the government.

 

[The Doc]

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

The concept was Oliver's "Banned at LC" badge. Again, you have failed at seeing the context of the situation. The award was strictly forbidden to those who were banned from LC for being offensive or misbehaving on the LC forums. It was only given to those who were banned for asking legitimate questions and behaving in a mature and professional way, yet were banned by the admins anyway.

So, no. It doesn't reflect badly on JREF, but it did show the fascism of the LC admin staff.

Context Rea, context. You must stop taking things out of context.

 

[Yaters]

Yaters, first off it ain't my movement.

I highlighted a particular portion in red because it works both ways, just substitute "truthers" for "skeptics" and you have the essence of the MO of an equivalent number of "skeptics" on this forum.

I am convinced that if the "nutters" on both sides were brought to book and removed then the sensible people could work this out. The problem is that the moderates on both sides will not deal with thier idiots.

That said the idiots do keep me entertained.

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

William-

I do apologize for grouping you in, when it's true, I'm not completely sure of your stance on the topic.

I understand your point, and I agree to some degree that there are skeptics here who do go after Ctists, but here is the fundamental problem with your argument: CTists came to the world with their views, skeptics did not.

When I asked what good it does to harass skeptics, I asked not because I am faulting CTists for being insulting and childish(there is plenty of that on both sides), but because they constantly start threads and release videos, but we NEVER hear about them doing things with the evidence that they should be doing.

Can you at least agree, that for the Truth Movement, posting on message boards and releasing videos does little more than spark interest? Don't they want justice? Don't they want those they think are responsible to go down for their crimes?

Instead, what they do merely garners them attention, and makes money for them.

Anyway, William, that's my two cents.

 

[beachnut]

ROFLOL seriously, you're complaining to me about being taken out of context. Welcome to my world Doc, let's see if you can take the dirt that you find it so easy to deal out.

And what does this have to do with the OP? Are you off topic again with your opinions? You seem to have some problem with something, do you need some help understanding this stuff?