LC Questions JREF credentials

[William Rea]

The families of 3000+ people are laughing right along with you.

Aaaah when logic fails try good ole appeal to emotion. Welcome, I was expecting you but you are rather early.

 

[William Rea]

Are you saying that the JREF was responsible for 9/11? That the members of this forum are the ones who the Truthers want to see brought to justice for attacking America?

If people here devote energy towards trying to stem the tide of slanderous lies which flows from the mouths of "Truthers", then I believe they are doing good. Unlike the endless whinging and pointless sniping that you post Mr Rea, people here actually try to educate others.

Have you ever posted anything here that wasn't just a whinge? If so, I haven't seen it.

Hmmm, you brought a friend Zep, how nice. I'll set another plate at the table.

 

[Brainache]

Hmmm, you brought a friend Zep, how nice. I'll set another plate at the table.

I spose that is some kind of whinge about more washing up...

 

[Mince]

Oh don't worry I get it...

No, you still don't get it. Their mortal enemy is the NWO. Instead of fighting them, they waste their time on message boards bantering with us, much like you're doing now.

We have no mortal enemy. We don't fear for our lives and liberties like they (you?) do. We do not believe the U.S. Government (any government) is planning to kill and/or enslave us. Certainly I can't speak for others, but if I believed (I mean really, really believed) the government was planning to kill and/or enslave me, there is no way in [rule8] I'd waste my precious time on a [rule8] message board.

So you see, they are wasting their time on message boards. I mean really, is it so crucial to have our acceptance before engaging the NWO? Sure, most of them consider us an enemy; but they also consider us harmless overall. We are not wasting our time on their message boards because, for us, there is no other enemy we could/should be fighting. Not that we consider them the enemy (I sure don't); I'm just continuing the metaphor.

 

[Mince]

The families of 3000+ people are laughing right along with you.

Imagine the (what must be) boisterous laughter of Osama et. al. "We kill their people and destroy their cathedrals, claim responsibility, and they blame themselves. WTF!?" Is that not the perfect crime, as they say? Fortunately, only a relatively small division of society believes it was not Osama et. al. There is still an overwhelmingly large contingent not willing to eradicate or mitigate Osama et. al.'s guilt in such matters.

 

[The Doc]

Oh don't worry I get it but it's clear you don't.

I find it equally as hilarious when I see you all doing exactly the same as you just accused them, the bolded part above being a good example.

The hypocrisy has gone beyond disbelief to the realms of high comedy.

I really don't appreciate being taken out of context, Rea. If you had read the paragraph before the one you bolded, you would probably not come off as a nit wit to the rest of the forum when you call others a hypocrite.

As posters above me have said, the priority of "debunkers" is to demonstrate that the conspiracy theorists are incorrect in their assertions. If there is any "enemy" we have that we are trying to bring down... it's them.

Conspiracy theorists, on the other hand, spend all their time attacking us. In reality they should be attacking the government and those they think are responsible for the attacks. They should be spending their efforts on submitting evidence to the appropriate places. If their evidence is so strong, there shouldn't be any debunkers at all. They should be ignoring us if we don't have a point, and they should leave their bullet proof evidence to the justice system.

Should we ignore the conspiracy theorists if they don't have a point? No. It's up to us to demonstrate the fact that they don't have a point.

So Rea, instead of making an ass out of yourself, you should start reading what people type.

You, well you're worse than a conspiracy theorist. All you do is troll these forums without ever bringing up evidence either way of this argument. You can't even defend your own position without resulting to your constant whining and complaining.

 

[Stellafane]

I am credentialed by virtue of the fact that I am a non-lunatic. That provides me an enormous advantage over every truther I've ever seen.

ETA: Oh and by the way truthers, that person in my avatar isn't really me, honest. It's actually the person who's responsible for 9/11, faked the moon landing, shot JFK, and keeps every girl in the world from liking you. His name is Big Brother, and he's watching you!

 

[Sabrina]

Oh, so you are highly qualified as an NWO minion then.

Are you done with that psyops campaign I asked you to work on? We still have to finish the plans to get everyone into the FEMA death camps.

Don't you EVER check your inbox? It's on your desk for a reason, ya dope.

 

[William Rea]

I really don't appreciate being taken out of context, Rea. If you had read the paragraph before the one you bolded, you would probably not come off as a nit wit to the rest of the forum when you call others a hypocrite.

As posters above me have said, the priority of "debunkers" is to demonstrate that the conspiracy theorists are incorrect in their assertions. If there is any "enemy" we have that we are trying to bring down... it's them.

Conspiracy theorists, on the other hand, spend all their time attacking us. In reality they should be attacking the government and those they think are responsible for the attacks. They should be spending their efforts on submitting evidence to the appropriate places. If their evidence is so strong, there shouldn't be any debunkers at all. They should be ignoring us if we don't have a point, and they should leave their bullet proof evidence to the justice system.

Should we ignore the conspiracy theorists if they don't have a point? No. It's up to us to demonstrate the fact that they don't have a point.

So Rea, instead of making an ass out of yourself, you should start reading what people type.

You, well you're worse than a conspiracy theorist. All you do is troll these forums without ever bringing up evidence either way of this argument. You can't even defend your own position without resulting to your constant whining and complaining.

Oh dear, I've hit a sore spot so Doc, mince et al have decided to throw their toys.

Hypocrite, take the plank from your own eye before you remove the splinter from anyone elses.

 

[William Rea]

I really don't appreciate being taken out of context, Rea.

ROFLOL seriously, you're complaining to me about being taken out of context. Welcome to my world Doc, let's see if you can take the dirt that you find it so easy to deal out.

 

[Yaters]

ROFLOL seriously, you're complaining to me about being taken out of context. Welcome to my world Doc, let's see if you can take the dirt that you find it so easy to deal out.

How about it, William? Why do the Truthers direct their energy at people at JREF, and not at submitting evidence and proving their side of the story? What good does harassing skeptics do for them? Actually, a better question is, what good does harassing skeptics do for the movement?

In the end, isn't the search for truth, in essence, a quest for justice? So, in a quest for justice, what is gained by attacking skeptics?

Even if your movement did actully sway everyone, what does that accomplish? Of course, if it is just a truth movement, splendid, everyone now knows the truth. But the crimes go unpunished. And, the arguments your side proposes are filled with legal terms, "evidence", "testimonies", so, really, your side is pushing for justice, by exposing the truth.

I'm sure I'll get some kind of dodgey response, but I figured I would try anyway. As dodgey as your replies have been so far, they've been well written.

 

[A W Smith]

heart burn, Indigestion, Upset stomach, Willaim Rea, hey pepto bismol.

I am in the unique position of finding it even funnier. I get to laugh at how much equivalent energy JREF directs at them, that's twice the hysterics!

I personally find it hilarious how much time and energy William Rea puts into complaining about the JREF forums, when all he really uses the JREF forums to do is complain.

Ive said it in the past, And It still stands. William is a Troll, Ignore him.

 

[William Rea]

How about it, William? Why do the Truthers direct their energy at people at JREF, and not at submitting evidence and proving their side of the story? What good does harassing skeptics do for them? Actually, a better question is, what good does harassing skeptics do for the movement?

In the end, isn't the search for truth, in essence, a quest for justice? So, in a quest for justice, what is gained by attacking skeptics?

Even if your movement did actully sway everyone, what does that accomplish? Of course, if it is just a truth movement, splendid, everyone now knows the truth. But the crimes go unpunished. And, the arguments your side proposes are filled with legal terms, "evidence", "testimonies", so, really, your side is pushing for justice, by exposing the truth.

I'm sure I'll get some kind of dodgey response, but I figured I would try anyway. As dodgey as your replies have been so far, they've been well written.

Yaters, first off it ain't my movement.

I highlighted a particular portion in red because it works both ways, just substitute "truthers" for "skeptics" and you have the essence of the MO of an equivalent number of "skeptics" on this forum.

I am convinced that if the "nutters" on both sides were brought to book and removed then the sensible people could work this out. The problem is that the moderates on both sides will not deal with thier idiots.

That said the idiots do keep me entertained.

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

 

[Civilized Worm]

Are you saying that the JREF was responsible for 9/11? That the members of this forum are the ones who the Truthers want to see brought to justice for attacking America?

Actually there's probably quite a few of them that do think that.

We have no mortal enemy. We don't fear for our lives and liberties like they (you?) do. We do not believe the U.S. Government (any government) is planning to kill and/or enslave us.

Speak for yourself, I have deep suspicions about the Liechtenstein government!

 

[Horatius]

Hypocrite,

So we'll add that to the list of words Billy doesn't know the meaning of.

 

[tsig]

I am in the unique position of finding it even funnier. I get to laugh at how much equivalent energy JREF directs at them, that's twice the hysterics!

My name is William Rea

I get to say the nay

And when I'm done

I get to run

Very far away.

 

[KoihimeNakamura]

Yaters, first off it ain't my movement.

So, what do you believe? I remember calling you a truther (in error, since you've made no statements in either way). Do you have any believes on this subject at all, or are you just a troll?

I highlighted a particular portion in red because it works both ways, just substitute "truthers" for "skeptics" and you have the essence of the MO of an equivalent number of "skeptics" on this forum.

Not.. really. The refrence of "Chronic Debunking System" is a half-joke, a lot of truthers tend to repeat recycled garbage. There is a reason why new members are recommened the Search function, ya'know.

I am convinced that if the "nutters" on both sides were brought to book and removed then the sensible people could work this out. The problem is that the moderates on both sides will not deal with thier idiots.

Names?

There was even a forum over here once celebrating and giving awards to people who had gone across to LCF to get banned! How exactly does that reflect on JREF Forums?

There was a specific person, actually. And it was again, gallows humor. (To note, that was a THREAD. The CT section is a subforum, after all.)

 

[tsig]

Oh don't worry I get it but it's clear you don't.

I find it equally as hilarious when I see you all doing exactly the same as you just accused them, the bolded part above being a good example.

The hypocrisy has gone beyond disbelief to the realms of high comedy.

Edited by Lisa Simpson: 

Edited to remove inappropriate remark.

Do not imply in any way a threat against another forum member, or you will be banned.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

 

[tsig]

That said the idiots do keep me entertained.

William Rea has a meeting of minds

 

[LashL]

If I am not mistaken, someone imported a "whining baby smiley" for William Rea. It is, nearly universally, the appropriate response to his posts.