Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe the porcupines are not even waiting for bigfoot to die. Maybe Chris can get us some HD footage from 15 feet away of a porcupine attacking, killing & eating a bigfoot. That would be quality "research", I tell you!
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Certainly skeletons have been found by spelunkers. I had an uncle credited with one such find. Looking around in a cave and heading up a dig are very very different activities. Chris B.
Click to expand...

You do realize that such a find of a true humanoid skeleton, when reported, would instantly attract the attention of the police, and if it was not human, of scientists? In fact, this would be true even if it was a more ancient human. And that any restrictions on private individuals digging up these remains would not apply to these officials?

Further, it would be relatively easy to isolate DNA from such a skeleton and type it. But what happened when people did this from many different "Bigfoot" hair samples? Oh, it turned out that the hair was mis-identified and not Bigfoot at all.

I suspect that your uncle mis-identified his find. If not, it should still be there and reported to the authorities. They will be very interested in identifying the nature and age of the remains.

Here is an easy way for you to obtain the convincing proof that you have stated you wish to find: just pick up the telephone and call in your uncle's find.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Hold your horses and your out of context attempt to swing this conversation elsewhere.

We were discussing the difference between Chinese "farmers" and North American "farmers" as related to motivation for finding "Dragon Bones"

The Chinese guys had motive as they were making money from the sale of these fossils to medicine shops. Our guys didn't have the same motivation.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

Right because if farmers don't dig up bones to make folk remedies out of them, there is no science of paleontology and finding the fossil of a 10 foot tall monkey is just sooooo unreasonable.

Your BLAARGing needs an expansion pack.
 
Yes Chris you did a great job of identifying that tree stump and I would suggest you keep practicing. Your ability to tell the difference between trees and bigfoot still needs some refining.

Are trees easier to mistake for Bigfoot as opposed to tree stumps?
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
This is an excellent way of looking at the Bigfoot mystery.
Click to expand...
Yes it is, except for the mystery part. There is no mystery; if footie existed, we'd have one by now, and none of the handwaving and excusemaking you get up to changes this fact.
 
Last edited:
Since caves came up....here's one I "found" on the Green river/Mammoth Cave NP
It was maybe 200-300 off the river a liitle but of a climb/scramble to get to it.
Entrance from below

Entrance and interior


No bigfoot bones found...damn porcupines!!!
 
Northern Lights said:
Do you actually believe that anyone, and I do mean anyone, would fawn over that picture and even for the slightest instance, believe it could possibly be related to a squatch? Please
Click to expand...

I think people who see blown down trees as evidence of bigfoot are more than capable of interpreting that pile of sticks as evidence of bigfoot.
 
Dang it PT quit bringing up facts!!
That cave could have been a dragons lairs....now my secrets out :(
Cervelo Dragon Hunter!
 
Cervelo said:
Yes Chris you did a great job of identifying that tree stump and I would suggest you keep practicing. Your ability to tell the difference between trees and bigfoot still needs some refining.
[qimg]http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/yy242/RCM944/00922B26-1B4A-49EA-9B37-18E8128DCA6A.jpg[/qimg]
Are trees easier to mistake for Bigfoot as opposed to tree stumps?
Click to expand...

Well, since the pic on the right shows a tree with a prominent fork center pic and the pic on the left shows that prominent fork blocked by something in front of it. I don't think I have any problem identifying trees or objects in front of them. Chris B.
 
Pterodactyl said:
I found this mammal checklist of Mammoth Cave NP online. Largest animal is a whitetail deer, since the habitat there doesn't even support black bear. I probably shouldn't be surprised that the biologists who compiled this list missed bigfoot, since they also missed all the wolves and mtn. lions too.

http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/chekbird/r4/mammal.htm
Click to expand...

A little closer study on Mammoth Cave and Mountain Lions would reveal those biologists were indeed slacking in their duties. As it's common knowledge Cougars are alive and well there and in the surrounding areas. I guess the locals don't count? Well how about Government employees?:

http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/cave-cougars/

Chris B.
 
You know, dragons, bigfoots, black "panthers" , whatever the case may be, I guess my biggest problem with charades like these is that, outside of being so obviously ridiculous they really aren't even worth serious consideration at this point, to believe a person is telling the truth about encounters like these is to call incompetent all of the professionals who work in biology, paleontology, or any number of scientific disciplines, who are in the field practicing their trade way, way more often than your typical bigfooter. And that only real outdoorsmen bigfooters, nay visionary explorers, like Daniel Boone and elite big-footers with their own websites are able to find these things. It is a shockingly ridiculous premise, and to believe grown adults buy into it makes me slightly embarrassed to even engage them in conversation, online or otherwise.
 
WTH?

1. You cite Cryptomundo to show us that Cougars are 'Alive and Well' in MCNP

2. The Cryptomundo quote says 'Sightings have been up' nothing about actual cougars being there.

show us where in the article the guy says Cougars exist in Mammoth Cave NP.
 
Drewbot said:
WTH?

1. You cite Cryptomundo to show us that Cougars are 'Alive and Well' in MCNP

2. The Cryptomundo quote says 'Sightings have been up' nothing about actual cougars being there.

show us where in the article the guy says Cougars exist in Mammoth Cave NP.
Click to expand...

It doesn't actually even matter. We know cougars move around a bit. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see one pop up in any of the lower 48 at this point. But of course when one does, it leaves evidence of its existence. It can be capture on film, shot and killed, whatever. Complete false equivalency.
 
Giordano said:
You do realize that such a find of a true humanoid skeleton, when reported, would instantly attract the attention of the police, and if it was not human, of scientists? In fact, this would be true even if it was a more ancient human. And that any restrictions on private individuals digging up these remains would not apply to these officials?

Further, it would be relatively easy to isolate DNA from such a skeleton and type it. But what happened when people did this from many different "Bigfoot" hair samples? Oh, it turned out that the hair was mis-identified and not Bigfoot at all.

I suspect that your uncle mis-identified his find. If not, it should still be there and reported to the authorities. They will be very interested in identifying the nature and age of the remains.

Here is an easy way for you to obtain the convincing proof that you have stated you wish to find: just pick up the telephone and call in your uncle's find.
Click to expand...

My uncle's find was called in and investigated to determine if it was a murder victim. It was a big deal at the time. As it turned out, it was found to be Native American remains and alot older than first thought. Pretty cool though, it had evidence of brain surgery being performed and the Native American had lived long enough after the surgery there was evidence of healing. The skeleton was pretty big, but not Bigfoot. I guess it's taking up space in some university drawer now, or been returned to tribal leaders. There was a big stink about NA bones in collections at one time. I liked exploring caves when I was younger too, never found anything that cool though.
Chris B.
 
Pterodactyl said:
It doesn't actually even matter. We know cougars move around a bit. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see one pop up in any of the lower 48 at this point. But of course when one does, it leaves evidence of its existence. It can be capture on film, shot and killed, whatever. Complete false equivalency.
Click to expand...

It does matter.
Chris posted a link to a website, with a comment that Cougars are alive and well, and that it is supported by Wildlife officials. The link says nothing of the sort.

This is a problem to most rational people. To Bigfooters evidently, they can just put up a random link, with no relation to the comment made, and are fine with that.

Was Chris hoping noone would read the link? Did he think we'd say "OH COUGARS LIVE IN MAMMOTH CAVE NP, AND HE PROVIDED A LINK, I GUESS I'LL TAKE HIM AT HIS WORD..."
 
Last edited:
Pterodactyl said:
You know, dragons, bigfoots, black "panthers" , whatever the case may be, I guess my biggest problem with charades like these is that, outside of being so obviously ridiculous they really aren't even worth serious consideration at this point, to believe a person is telling the truth about encounters like these is to call incompetent all of the professionals who work in biology, paleontology, or any number of scientific disciplines, who are in the field practicing their trade way, way more often than your typical bigfooter. And that only real outdoorsmen bigfooters, nay visionary explorers, like Daniel Boone and elite big-footers with their own websites are able to find these things. It is a shockingly ridiculous premise, and to believe grown adults buy into it makes me slightly embarrassed to even engage them in conversation, online or otherwise.
Click to expand...
So let me get this right. You don't believe in Bigfoot and you don't believe in Cougars as far as them being sighted in KY right?

Drewbot said:
WTH?

1. You cite Cryptomundo to show us that Cougars are 'Alive and Well' in MCNP

2. The Cryptomundo quote says 'Sightings have been up' nothing about actual cougars being there.

show us where in the article the guy says Cougars exist in Mammoth Cave NP.
Click to expand...
So they don't exist until they do? Marvelous.
I can show you an article of a Cougar being killed in KY, but not in Mammoth Cave NP in particular, they tend to frown on killing wildlife there. Are they in the area? Yes they are. Regardless of popular opinion it's a fact like it or not. Chris B.
 
Chris, there could be cougars in Mammoth Cave NP.

The problem is that you said the Cryptomundo link would provide a government official confirming such a statement. It did not.

There could be wandering Male Cougars anywhere pretty much, we have found them in NH, Michigan, Ontario.

There is a reason they aren't listed on the MCNP mammal list however, it is that they don't have evidence of a breeding population.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom