Merged Kyoon's Theories Regarding The Illuminati And Other Subjects

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, the OP NEVER claims this.
Thanks for showing you have no reading comprehension or are just spamming, either way stay out of my threads.

It says that Michelle Obama is transgendered.
The term 'peniser" has been put forth to describe anyone who believes that Mrs. Obama is a transgendered. His question stands.

ETA: Comprehension would follow more closely if you tried writing in something other than your own very special rhetoric.
 
Last edited:
Well, having failed to answer my first question (I thought I'd start with an easy one), how about offering some evidence in support of your assertion that President Obama murdered his own nanny. Got anything?
 
Well, having failed to answer my first question (I thought I'd start with an easy one)

You never asked a real question. Just a joke "question" not worth a reply.

how about offering some evidence in support of your assertion that President Obama murdered his own nanny. Got anything?

Had you read the article you would know "Obama" never murdered his own "granny" and that is another non-question from you.
 
From Endless Destruction to Endless Deception - Totally exposed

I wish to ask for the clarification of the following three terms to understand what you are referring to specifically with:

Thank you for a real reply.

There should be no need to explain "who are the illuminati" in a Conspiracy Theory message board, but let me know.

The illuminati religion is first of all not about using the human cattle to make money but to slaughter, humiliate and mock the human cattle.

The fulfillment of the illuminati's religion is based on THREE pre-conditions:
- Endless destruction to Endless deception
- Acceptance of the Mark of the Beast
- One world government

The first EDICT would be Global Genocide.

An example of one illuminati commandment mentioned in the OP,
Endless deception, to serve NOTHING but simulated reality at the end of the show.
 
You never asked a real question. Just a joke "question" not worth a reply.



Had you read the article you would know "Obama" never murdered his own "granny" and that is another non-question from you.

So, you didn't post this? (I highlighted the key portion for you just in case)

BIG BANG: the most extreme inversion of illuminati scripts ever
The ultimate reverse script starts with a sudden inversion just before the BIG BANG, launched with "Obama"'s staged arrest.
Some of the scripts that will be suddenly inverted:
1. Multiracial society and open borders becomes manhunt for aliens and non-whites
2. Legalize drugs becomes execution of drug addicts
3. "Gay marriage legalized" becomes manhunt for homosexuals
4. "Ultra-nationalists" become "our national heroes"
5. Staged democracy becomes "Hitler was right"

Obama's full detonation: Contrast official bombs based on simulation with subliminal bombs based on reality:
When the ethnic indonesian actor playing both "Obama" and "Osama" will fully detonate many of his previous bombs will finally become official while others will remain subliminal.
As expected from the illuminati religion's commandment of serving nothing but simulated reality, only simulated bombs will become official.

Obama family bombs: Contrast "kenyan father" and "hawaiian granny" with tranny "Michelle":
Contrast what will happen immediately after the act "Osama resurrects in Jerusalem, crucified to the missing Boeing 777".

Official bombs based on simulation: "Father" and "Granny"
Two of the bombs part of Obama's full detonation are related to Obama's official "family", more precisely to two purely virtual characters: kenyan father and hawaiian grandmother:
- "Obama forged his birth certificate to conceal he was born in his father's homeland, Kenya."
- "Obama personally strangled his granny in her bed in Hawaii, days before the 2008 election, to make sure that the truth about his birth certificate will never surface."
Subliminal bombs based on reality: Tranny "wife"
The countless bombs related to "wife Michelle" being in fact a tranny will remain subliminal.
In other words:
"Obama married to a tranny" will not become official.
The endless list of Obama murders will include "Joan Rivers", but the official story will only be "because she attacked Obama" and not go as far "because she exposed Michelle as a tranny".

Example of such a subliminal bomb released shortly before Obama's full detonation: "Obama to Public Schools: Allow Transgender Students Access to Bathrooms".
One of the agendas is to have people, starting with psy-ops, comment:
"Obama's passion for transgender raises question about Michelle's gender. here have been rumors for several years about Michelle O's birth gender.
Is it possible that Obama's current passion for transgender rights, bathrooms, etc., is related to Michelle's gender?"
 
So, you didn't post this? (I highlighted the key portion for you just in case)

Sabrina, would you please quote the highlighted passage and remove the rest of the article? It is unnecessary to re-post OP and only discourages readers from replying.

Notice the use of italics to indicate simulation, NOT reality.
Also note the usage of "two purely virtual characters" indicating no real murder, much less a real victim "granny".
 
Sabrina, would you please quote the highlighted passage and remove the rest of the article? It is unnecessary to re-post OP and only discourages readers from replying.

Notice the use of italics to indicate simulation, NOT reality.
Also note the usage of "two purely virtual characters" indicating no real murder, much less a real victim "granny".

So, now you're saying that Obama's father and grandmother were not real people? And I'm supposed to somehow magically divine that italics in this case, when you never indicated in your posts that this was the case, mean that what the italics are saying is supposed to be simulation?

You, my friend, are making absolutely zero sense. Could you please, concisely and clearly, preferably in bulletized form, lay out what your assertions are regarding.... well, whatever it is you're claiming is a conspiracy. Exactly what are you claiming, by the way?
 
There should be no need to explain "who are the illuminati" in a Conspiracy Theory message board, but let me know.

And this is followed by:

The illuminati religion is first of all not about using the human cattle to make money but to slaughter, humiliate and mock the human cattle.

The fulfillment of the illuminati's religion is based on THREE pre-conditions:
- Endless destruction to Endless deception
- Acceptance of the Mark of the Beast
- One world government

See, that's not what the Illuminati is about. Even if they're still around those thing you've just listed have nothing to do with Illuminati. Each one is a lie, spread by paranoid, delusional, and dishonest people with agendas of their own. The Illuminati makes a great target because it likely doesn't actually exist, and therefore makes a great bogey man for whatever perceived ills an accuser wants to blame on them.

In the US, there are at most 750,000 people who are transgender, the number that are children is even smaller. The estimated current population of the US right now is 321,368,864 people, so these laws are about protecting a SMALL NUMBER OF HUMAN BEINGS.

How does this advance the Illuminati's global agenda?
 
Sabrina, would you please quote the highlighted passage and remove the rest of the article? It is unnecessary to re-post OP and only discourages readers from replying.

Notice the use of italics to indicate simulation, NOT reality.
Also note the usage of "two purely virtual characters" indicating no real murder, much less a real victim "granny".

Then post some evidence that this has been a story put forth by anyone as either realityor simulation.
 
So, now you're saying that Obama's father and grandmother were not real people?
I never claimed they were real people, it is EXPLICITLY stated they are virtual creations.

Exactly what are you claiming, by the way?
The OP article is 7 lines long describing what are the agendas behind the recent "transgender bathrooms" "news".
3 of those 7 lines are, in fact, bulletized form.
 
I never claimed they were real people, it is EXPLICITLY stated they are virtual creations.


The OP article is 7 lines long describing what are the agendas behind the recent "transgender bathrooms" "news".
3 of those 7 lines are, in fact, bulletized form.

Besides your say so, and that of the very similar poster on GLP, is there any evidence at all to back up any of those claims?
 
Sounds like they're channeling Francis E Dec. :eye-poppi

The murderer Teddy Kennedy, falsely claims he was driving and drove the car off of the bridge. “EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES”: Playboy sodomist Teddy Kennedy was a married man and his wife was in the hospital giving birth to another of his brood. The local radio stations explained that therefore Teddy Kennedy needed batchelor’s love in his lonliness dated Jo Ann Kopekney.

Are YOU sufficiently stratified scum on top to gleefully watch Frankenstein Eyesight Television play back of the JO ANN KOPEKNEY, SODOMY, RAPE AND MURDER by the big Teddy Kennedy (Including the nearby crowds of people at the scene, the following day, screaming that Teddy Kennedy was the rape, sodomist, murderer of his secretary JO ANN KOPEKNEY.)
 
The Illuminati makes a great target because it likely doesn't actually exist, and therefore makes a great bogey man for whatever perceived ills an accuser wants to blame on them.
...
How does this advance the Illuminati's global agenda?

Two misconceptions about the illuminati are:
- illuminati roots are in Bavaria, Germany;
- secret society was created 1776.

Reality:
The illuminati were originally created under another name, masked as crusaders.
In other words: unlike the Templars, the illuminati didn't get control of the order using their most important weapon, traitors.
The order was satanic from the beginning.
The illuminati as secret society only began denying their own existence centuries later.

As far as "How does this [transgender bathrooms] advance the Illuminati's global agenda?", answered in points #1-3 of OP.
 
Kyoon, it seems a bit early in your forum career to spiral off on meta-argument about argument.

It is consistent with forum policy to cite your sources.

It is inconsistent with forum policy to present large passage of text as your own when they are not.

Either you wrote the text at GLP and dishonestly denied it, or you ripped off the text at GLP then dishonestly presented it as your own, or both posts were written by different people ripping off the same original writer. There are no other options in this scenario.

In any case, it's your name on post #1 of this thread so it's your duty to defend the claims within it. So far you haven't done that.
 
Last edited:
Horatius accused me that I "copied someone else's work".
This is not only a gross lie, but the way he accuses me is deceptive and misleading to the audience.

After I denied that I was NOT the OP of the link jaydeehess posted on page 1,
Horatius posted a DIFFERENT link to a reply that I did author, and tries to claim that is the post I originally denied.

There are no other options in this scenario.



There's the option that he's a fool who doesn't understand how forums work.
 
Either you wrote the text at GLP and dishonestly denied it

NOWHERE have I denied being the author of the reply Horatius linked to.
See post #64, where I explicitly state this.

I denied being the OP in the link jaydeehess posted on page 1, which he implied I authored.

Now, please apologize and quit trying to convince the audience "Kyoon is a liar/plagiarizing" or admit that is your goal.
 
This is post #1 in case you missed it

"Obama to Public Schools: Allow Transgender Students Access to Bathrooms" - agendas
"Obama" transgender Bathrooms bomb: agendas for dummies, from classic to suicide

1. - Classic tactical bomb, part of the agenda "brainwash children".
While the line between black and white is erased, the "black is white" agenda is advanced.
The "gender identity" disorder is rewritten as normal and beyond: everyone (read: children) must start the quest for their real gender identity.
2. - One of "Obama"'s countless suicide bombs.
3. - One of subliminal messages/bombs mocking the fact that "wife Michelle" is indeed a tranny.

Talk of subliminal messages: Timing for "Joan Rivers" again in headlines
The "dead" impersonator of the real Joan Rivers (murdered long ago) is again in the headlines as fake "black and white Obama" detonates the transgender bomb.
Reminder of one of the reasons to have fake Joan Rivers played by a non-white and her daughter played by a tranny:
because she was scripted, years later, to "expose" Michelle Obama as a transvestite, in the classic script "paid with her life for exposing it".

NOTES
May 13, 2016 - ‘Transgender’ dictionary lookups surge after Justice Department letter to schools
Transgender rights have become a national conversation topic since North Carolina passed its controversial “bathroom bill,” and search data reveals that many Americans may be struggling to learn more about LGBT issues and understand what being transgender means.
Merriam-Webster revealed that searches for “transgender” in its online dictionary surged 630 percent after the Obama administration on Friday sent an open letter to public schools across the country with guidelines for supporting transgender students.
The letter, signed by officials from the U.S. Justice and Education Departments, calls for public schools to allow transgender students to use the restrooms that align with their gender identities.


May 13, 2016 - Obama to Public Schools: Allow Transgender Students Access to Bathrooms

I'd like to start with your claims about Joan Rivers. As far as I know she wasn't involved in the Woods/Walken spy ring that got Natalie Woods killed, so perhaps you can tell us when and why she died/was killed and why.
 
In any case, it's your name on post #1 of this thread so it's your duty to defend the claims within it. So far you haven't done that.

I do not reply to spam and non-replies.

I've answered all rational questions to this point.
Let me know if I missed one.
 
Post {98} contains a serious question directly addressing one of your claims.

Your use of the word spam is incompatible with locally agreed upon meaning. If you object to content or form of a post you may bring it to the attention of forum moderators using the triangle button with an exclamation point in it, bottom left corner of each and every single post. If they agree with your assessment they will act appropriately.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom