Merged Kyoon's Theories Regarding The Illuminati And Other Subjects

[Sabrina]

I never claimed they were real people, it is EXPLICITLY stated they are virtual creations.


The OP article is 7 lines long describing what are the agendas behind the recent "transgender bathrooms" "news".
3 of those 7 lines are, in fact, bulletized form.

And exactly zero of them make any claims, or indeed make any sense to people who speak English, which is the primary language on this message board.

I've read and re-read your original post several times now. I have yet to find any text in it that makes any sort of claim, or makes sense at all. The best I've got at this point is that you somehow believe there is some sort of nefarious agenda behind President Obama making an executive decision to protect the rights of a minority population in this country, but I can't make heads or tails out of what you think the nefarious agenda is. What, exactly, in one single sentence, do you think is the reason behind President Obama stating that transgender children should be allowed to use the bathroom that identifies with their chosen gender identity?

 

[stanfr]

Could we please try to work Donald Trump into this thread somehow?...cause frankly I am just not hearing enough about the Donald these days...has to be some kind of conspiracy.

 

[Kyoon]

I'd like to start with your claims about Joan Rivers.
...
so perhaps you can tell us when and why she died/was killed and why.

Thanks for the real participation.

Non white Joan Rivers impersonator, a tranny as daughter
Joan Rivers and her family were murdered long ago.
A non white started playing her role, supposedly after plastic surgery, a transvestite started playing her daughter.

One of the agendas is to have people swallow any impersonator that the illuminati use to replace assassinated oppositors (from Mandela played by Morgan Freeman to Sharon and Putin).
Other agendas include:
- "plastic surgery is good for you" agenda
- scripted as another fake subliminal bomb adding to "Obama"'s endless list of "crimes", suggesting that "Joan Rivers is yet another name in the countless list of people murdered by Obama"

The actress impersonating Rivers "died" 2014 as much as "Mandela" 2013.

 

[Magrat]

Sabrina, would you please quote the highlighted passage and remove the rest of the article? It is unnecessary to re-post OP and only discourages readers from replying.
Notice the use of italics to indicate simulation, NOT reality.
Also note the usage of "two purely virtual characters" indicating no real murder, much less a real victim "granny".

That's not what is discouraging honey.

 

[arthwollipot]

Formulate a question about the first thing you don't understand.

Very well. Can you please explain what this part of your OP means?

"Obama transgender *** Bathrooms bomb ***: agendas for dummies"

 

[arthwollipot]

Two misconceptions about the illuminati are:
- illuminati roots are in Bavaria, Germany;
- secret society was created 1776.

Reality:
The illuminati were originally created under another name, masked as crusaders.
In other words: unlike the Templars, the illuminati didn't get control of the order using their most important weapon, traitors.
The order was satanic from the beginning.
The illuminati as secret society only began denying their own existence centuries later.

As far as "How does this [transgender bathrooms] advance the Illuminati's global agenda?", answered in points #1-3 of OP.

Can you explain to us how you know so much about the Illuminati please?

 

[Magrat]

I do not reply to spam and non-replies.

I've answered all rational questions to this point.
Let me know if I missed one.

Every time he calls me spam this is what I hear:

 

[stanfr]

I LOVE spam! Delicious spam...wonderful spam, spam, spam, spam!

 

[Magrat]

I LOVE spam! Delicious spam...wonderful spam, spam, spam, spam!

 

[stanfr]

Thanks for the real participation.

Non white Joan Rivers impersonator, a tranny as daughter
Joan Rivers and her family were murdered long ago.
A non white started playing her role, supposedly after plastic surgery, a transvestite started playing her daughter.

One of the agendas is to have people swallow any impersonator that the illuminati use to replace assassinated oppositors (from Mandela played by Morgan Freeman to Sharon and Putin).
Other agendas include:
- "plastic surgery is good for you" agenda
- scripted as another fake subliminal bomb adding to "Obama"'s endless list of "crimes", suggesting that "Joan Rivers is yet another name in the countless list of people murdered by Obama"

The actress impersonating Rivers "died" 2014 as much as "Mandela" 2013.

How do we know that *you* weren't assassinated and replaced by someone impersonating you??

 

[stanfr]

[qimg]http://i.giphy.com/WIg8P0VNpgH8Q.gif[/qimg]

Ha! I knew i could fit Trump into this somehow! (hint: that scene specifically mentions feasting upon a Trump analogy... )

 

[Magrat]

Ha! I knew i could fit Trump into this somehow! (hint: that scene specifically mentions feasting upon a Trump analogy... )

well played sir!

 

[Kyoon]

What, exactly, in one single sentence, do you think is the reason behind President Obama stating that transgender children should be allowed to use the bathroom that identifies with their chosen gender identity?

Answered in OP:
"The "gender identity" disorder is rewritten as normal and beyond: everyone (read: children) must start the quest for their real gender identity."

In other words, part of rewriting history to erase the line between black and white, while selling that black is white.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Thanks for the real participation.

Non white Joan Rivers impersonator, a tranny as daughter
Joan Rivers and her family were murdered long ago.
A non white started playing her role, supposedly after plastic surgery, a transvestite started playing her daughter.

One of the agendas is to have people swallow any impersonator that the illuminati use to replace assassinated oppositors (from Mandela played by Morgan Freeman to Sharon and Putin).
Other agendas include:
- "plastic surgery is good for you" agenda
- scripted as another fake subliminal bomb adding to "Obama"'s endless list of "crimes", suggesting that "Joan Rivers is yet another name in the countless list of people murdered by Obama"

The actress impersonating Rivers "died" 2014 as much as "Mandela" 2013.

Your experiences on other fora may have left you unprepared for the expectations of this one. Repeating your claim, even with expansion, is not considered supporting your argument. Unlike, say, Bad Astronomy forum (whatever they're calling it now) you will not be booted for failing to provide supporting evidence, but unlike Icke forum we will not be sanctioned for demanding supporting evidence.


Please provide citations, links or library catalog numbers for your sources.

 

[madurobob]

BIG BANG: the most extreme inversion of illuminati scripts ever
The ultimate reverse script starts with a sudden inversion just before the BIG BANG, launched with "Obama"'s staged arrest.
Some of the scripts that will be suddenly inverted:
1. Multiracial society and open borders becomes manhunt for aliens and non-whites
2. Legalize drugs becomes execution of drug addicts
3. "Gay marriage legalized" becomes manhunt for homosexuals
4. "Ultra-nationalists" become "our national heroes"
5. Staged democracy becomes "Hitler was right"

Will you please help me parse this? Tell me if this is correct:

• You claim there are "scripts". As I understand your use of this term, it means a common meme, or way of thought, promoted by some nefarious and powerful group you call "Illuminati".
• These "scripts", seeming at face value to be strengthening society with greater protection for persecuted minorities, for instance, have a nefarious intent. That intent is actually the opposite of what we see as face value.

Is that about it?

If so - I have a followup quesiton or two: Do you have a list of these "scripts" you've identified, past and present? How does one know when something is a "script" and when its an actual rational change in a society's outlook on a given topic over time? Is there a difference?

 

[Kyoon]

Your use of the word spam is incompatible with locally agreed upon meaning.

Spam is a well known technique to kill thread discussion.

What would you classify RougeKitten's image macro spam, which has nothing to do with the OP and no real contribution to discourse?

 

[stanfr]

Answered in OP:
"The "gender identity" disorder is rewritten as normal and beyond: everyone (read: children) must start the quest for their real gender identity."

In other words, part of rewriting history to erase the line between black and white, while selling that black is white.

A child is black...
A child is white...
Together they grow--to see the light!

All together now--Y'all know the words!!

 

[stanfr]

Spam is a well known technique to kill thread discussion.

What would you classify RougeKitten's image macro spam, which has nothing to do with the OP and no real contribution to discourse?

What have you contributed, other than some completely unsubstantiated and un-evidenced gibberish?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Spam is a well known technique to kill thread discussion.

What would you classify RougeKitten's image macro spam, which has nothing to do with the OP and no real contribution to discourse?

I would call your questioning this post meta argument. I would call Rogue(not rouge) Kitten's contributions Argument By Gif. Not prohibited at this forum. Obnoxious, but allowed as long as on topic.

Were she to present the same exact image several times the it's spam.

If you keep posting the same exact question, reply or comment over and over it is called spamming. It is prohibited behavior at this forum.

If you present one useless but unique post after another it's just useless posts and doesn't have a specific name. {but I might be tempted to dub them "fuelair" posts, provided they incorporate a sufficient number of punctuation marks}

When a user such as RealityCheck presents a list of someone's failings or unanswered questions over and over and over it is technically spamming, but it's on topic. Thus, annoying but not prohibited. Thus, the Ignore feature might become your friend over time.

If you object to a specific post use the Report feature /!\ to the left.

 

[jaydeehess]

NOWHERE have I denied being the author of the reply Horatius linked to.

Nor have you stated you are the poster quoted. Are you or aren't you. You have been asked a few times and futz around and obfuscate rather than addressed it'

See post #64, where I explicitly state this.

Which says nothing concerned with what you have been asked.

I denied being the OP in the link jaydeehess posted on page 1, which he implied I authored.

Great you deny something you were never accused of. I neither said or implied you were the OP author of that thread.

Now, please apologize and quit trying to convince the audience "Kyoon is a liar/plagiarizing" or admit that is your goal.

I am not sure anyone has done that. You have been asked if you are the poster quoted on GLP and YOU REFUSE to give a straight answer. THAT is obfuscation and avoidance which suggests you may be a dishonest person.

WILL YOU state unambiguously that you are not that poster and give us an opinion on why your phrases and his/hers are so similar?

Will you answer questions about any evidence of the claims you make?

OR
Will you just continue to assert these ridiculous claims and insist we believe them or be fools for not following your religious based lunacy?