KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

[Galileo]

Your "analysis" was hilarious. You take each action independent of each other, and without any connection or context, and then argue that this action was perfectly legal and doesn't prove anything. And this is aside from the fact that this list was never intended to be evidence anyway. It is a bit like this.

Say a young woman was found dead, bound with duct tape, at 123 main street, shot by a 45 caliber pistol. The police arrest the suspect and put him on trial with the following facts.

Suspect owns a 45 caliber pistol.

Galileo and Barrett: So what, it is not illegal to own a pistol in this country!

Suspect lives at 124 Main Street.

Galileo and Barrett: Now they are persecuting a man solely because of where he lives. Obviously their case is weak.

Suspect was caught on video camera the day before the murder purchasing duct tape at WalMart.

Galileo and Barrett: So, it is perfectly legal to purchase duct tape. Maybe he was working on home repairs?

I could go on, but this idiocy is not worth the time.

You are a conspiracy theorist. That's why you think a $100 checking account is part of a vast multi-continent conspiracy. The guy who opened the bank account isn't even on trial!

 

[triforcharity]

I'm sure the $100 balance of a checking account is not the only evidence they have.

I highly doubt the whole case vs. KSM hinges on the bank account.

 

[Galileo]

I'm sure the $100 balance of a checking account is not the only evidence they have.

I highly doubt the whole case vs. KSM hinges on the bank account.

The $100 is evidence of nothing. Yet the conspiracists put it forward as prime proof that KSM is guilty.

 

[W.D.Clinger]

The $100 is evidence of nothing. Yet the conspiracists put it forward as prime proof that KSM is guilty.

You wouldn't recognize a piece of evidence if it came through your windshield.

 

[triforcharity]

That is just one small piece of evidence. His pre-waterboard confession is another.
His direct ties to AQ is another....

 

[carlitos]

You wouldn't recognize a piece of evidence if it came through your windshield.

The way he drives, he's more likely to have a neighbor (or maybe a deer) come through his windshield. Who breathes into the ignition lock for you, Rolf - A trained dog?

 

[JamesB]

Not to mention the three pages of actual evidence, which they refuse to address.

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/muhammad_sheikh_Khalid.pdf

 

[Galileo]

You wouldn't recognize a piece of evidence if it came through your windshield.

You are a conspiracy theorist. Everything seems suspicious to you.

 

[Galileo]

That is just one small piece of evidence. His pre-waterboard confession is another.
His direct ties to AQ is another....

His confession that he killed Jimmy Carter or the Pope? Or that building in Seattle that wasn't even built until after he was in custody?

 

[Galileo]

Not to mention the three pages of actual evidence, which they refuse to address.

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/muhammad_sheikh_Khalid.pdf

Unless you are a conspiracy theorist, there is nothing valuable in that document.

 

[Galileo]

The way he drives, he's more likely to have a neighbor (or maybe a deer) come through his windshield. Who breathes into the ignition lock for you, Rolf - A trained dog?

I have never been in a car accident. I am a safe driver, as my record proves.

 

[triforcharity]

No, DUI's do not constitute safe driving.

 

[JamesB]

Unless you are a conspiracy theorist, there is nothing valuable in that document.

That doesn't make sense, even as sarcasm.

 

[Galileo]

No, DUI's do not constitute safe driving.

Yes they do. I went road drinking over 10,000 times, and never got into an accident. I never got a DWI unless I was over .22

But a sober driver almost killed my mom and criplled my dad. Sober drivers are potential killers.

 

[Galileo]

That doesn't make sense, even as sarcasm.

It makes sense to you because you are a conspiracy theorist. You see a conspiracy lurking everywhere. This is a rational website.

 

[Justin39640]

First you say:

Yes they do. I went road drinking over 10,000 times, and never got into an accident. I never got a DWI unless I was over .22

But a sober driver almost killed my mom and criplled my dad. Sober drivers are potential killers.

Then you say:

It makes sense to you because you are a conspiracy theorist. You see a conspiracy lurking everywhere. This is a rational website.

Maybe you should think about what you're saying.

 

[D Dub]

Yes they do. I went road drinking over 10,000 times, and never got into an accident. I never got a DWI unless I was over .22

But a sober driver almost killed my mom and criplled my dad. Sober drivers are potential killers.

you drove drunk everyday for nearly 30 years..?

 

[W.D.Clinger]

Yes they do. I went road drinking over 10,000 times, and never got into an accident. I never got a DWI unless I was over .22

you drove drunk everyday for nearly 30 years..?

That's entirely plausible. It's certainly consistent with his behavior here.

 

[funk de fino]

Yes they do. I went road drinking over 10,000 times, and never got into an accident. I never got a DWI unless I was over .22

But a sober driver almost killed my mom and criplled my dad. Sober drivers are potential killers.

Drink drivers are stupid. Multiple drink drivers are stupid scum

A driver with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.10 or greater is seven times more likely to be involved in a fatal motor vehicle crash than is a driver who has not consumed alcoholic beverages, and a driver with an alcohol concentration of 0.15 or greater is about 25 times more likely.

Motor vehicle wrecks are the leading cause of death in the United States for persons under age 24, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Reports. Of those deaths, more than 40 percent are alcohol-related.

You sir, are a liar.

 

[doobiedoright]

I have never been in a car accident. I am a safe driver, as my record proves.

4 DUI's directly dispute that sir!
In fact they say just the opposite!