I'm doing no such thing. I'm simply asking you to state your argument more quantitatively. You've argued that nearly all the upper block was turned to dust, but that none of the steel in that block was turned to dust. A request for clarification seems reasonable in the circumstances.
Dave
No what you are attempting to do is confuse the issue...more smoke and mirrors.
All one has to do is take a look at the video and see that what I said is true. It is clear in the video. Asking all these details is an attempt to use the concept of...
"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."
-- Michael Rivero
...by trying to get me to jump through your irrelevant hoops and hope that others will see your response as excuse enough to keep believing in the OCT.
If you really want to discuss this one further then come on over to...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/10/caught_up_in_a_conspiracy_theo.html?page=1#comments
...and we can discuss it to your hearts content.
Hey i've spent time on your forum why not spent some time on a neutral site?
