Julian Assange: rapist or not?

[Joey McGee]

I'm not saying that your argument is wrong because you're so stupid and insane, I'm just mentioning that you exhibit these qualities. You claim you don't understand my criticisms while simultaneously being insulted by them. You respond to genuine criticisms by copy and pasting screed you happen to agree with in the most bizarre non-sequiur I've seen in recent memory. You couldn't take a joke if it was wrapped with 100 dollar bills, it's all very funny. Sorry you don't win points for being offended despite how it might make you feel.

 

[Joey McGee]

the internet based relationship between citizens ans governments in the public space: challenges for an integrated esuign.

[qimg]http://imageupload.co.uk/files/b0q5sko2umibr3ivaz0t.png[/qimg]

lol wut? We're talking about how Assange is avoiding justice and running a cult, and this is what your counter-argument is?

 

[Zeuzzz]

Thanks for your psychoanalysis of me, and misrepresentation of what I implied. I hoped for more objective replies to my statements, instead I got ad hom sentiment about my mental health. Good form.

If you want to take this further please post on my wall and divulge your concerns about my mental health so we can engage in productive dialogue.

Thanks for you input
.

 

[Joey McGee]

More moral superiority blather. How about we start with your delusion that Assange is popular and liked by any majority anywhere.

 

[nathan]

Assange is a freedom of speech hero. In fact one of the best ever. He will go down in historical record books as an entrepreneur for civil liberties and freedom of speech.

Isn't that bradley manning? He's the one who actually stuck his neck out for what he believed.

 

[Wudang]

Assange is a freedom of speech hero. In fact one of the best ever. He will go down in historical record books as an entrepreneur for civil liberties and freedom of speech.

No matter how much he is hated by certain national states, globally he has more support than most political leaders do.

And in your eyes that gives him the right to force himself on women.

 

[Zeuzzz]

unprovable, Retrospective molestation accusations are not only dubious and subjective but highly doubtful, especially when you consider the accusing woman's has ties yto the NSA ad CIA based on numerous national security agencies. Google itl

 

[zooterkin]

unprovable, Retrospective molestation accusations are not only dubious and subjective but highly doubtful,

So you're opposed to bringing any case to court where it depends on the word of one person against another?

especially when you consider the accusing woman's has ties yto the NSA ad CIA based on numerous national security agencies. Google itl

Which woman? Both the women were working for wikileaks, weren't they?

 

[Wudang]

unprovable,l

That is for a court to decide.

 

[Wudang]

the accusing woman's has ties yto the NSA ad CIA based on numerous national security agencies. Google itl

You were happy to post links earlier. Post a link to the best piece of evidence.

 

[nathan]

unprovable, Retrospective molestation accusations are not only dubious and subjective but highly doubtful

How do you make a non-retrospective accusation?

Why do you think the charges Sweden would like to bring are unprovable? Why do you think the various courts that have considered the issues are wrong?

 

[BenBurch]

Do you just wish he would do this?

OR do have have reasonable grounds to suspect he may?

People who are barricaded against police often do.

And no, I don't hope for that. That would make an undeserving martyr of the little rapist. What I want is for him to try to escape, get injured so badly in the attempt he is in pain all his life, hauled to Sweden, convicted, jailed, and then forgotten except by those on the left too stupid to at last realize what he is.

 

[Zeuzzz]

And no, I don't hope for that. That would make an undeserving martyr of the little rapist.

Not only do you have no proof of him committing molestation, but you equally have no proof for the more deplorable accusation of rape, both of which come from a female source with ties to the CIA and US security agencies.

I think it is time to reconsider the impartiality of your sources of information.

 

[Wudang]

Then as already asked post the link with the best evidence.

eta: by the logic of the articles I can find I must be a movie star as I have links to Kevin Bacon

 

[zooterkin]

Not only do you have no proof of him committing molestation, but you equally have no proof for the more deplorable accusation of rape, both of which come from a female source with ties to the CIA and US security agencies.

Even if they have such ties (I don't see you producing any proof of this yet; ironic, huh?), how does that cast doubt on their stories? Perhaps the claims should be examined in some formal setting, such as, I dunno, a court of law?

 

[Zeuzzz]

Ive covered this in depth before here, here is a start http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8806516&postcount=3971

which leads to more productive dialogue in the ensuing posts.

For the US national security links I posted I will have to spend more time scouring the thread. But they are here I assure you.

 

[TjW]

Ive covered this in depth before here, here is a start http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8806516&postcount=3971

which leads to more productive dialogue in the ensuing posts.

For the US national security links I posted I will have to spend more time scouring the thread. But they are here I assure you.

Gracious, the U.S. National Security Conspiracy Division must be really incompetent, then. If they'd asked me, I would have told them to use women without discoverable links to them.

 

[Wudang]

No I've repeatedly give single good references. Give me a link with some convincing data.

eta: I don't count them being called emotionally-vulnerable "sluts" evidence

 

[tsig]

Ive covered this in depth before here, here is a start http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8806516&postcount=3971

which leads to more productive dialogue in the ensuing posts.

For the US national security links I posted I will have to spend more time scouring the thread. But they are here I assure you.

From the link:

Crikey they are so immature and emotionally insecure.

Sofia felt rejected when Julian stopped having foreplay with her. Boo hoo. She also didn't like the tone in his voice. Oh no. After having sex numerous times that night one time Julian did not wear a condom and "she let him continue". Not rape.

Anna walks into the police office to report a sexual molestation / rape before even checking the condom that she left in her house to verify what she imagined happened?

"if it was broken as she thought, but she says she thinks she still has the condom at home and will look at it"

Did she get it later, and is there DNA and evidence of malfeasance?


Lots of slut shaming but nothing about CIA connections.

 

[Zeuzzz]

From the link:

Crikey they are so immature and emotionally insecure.

Sofia felt rejected when Julian stopped having foreplay with her. Boo hoo. She also didn't like the tone in his voice. Oh no. After having sex numerous times that night one time Julian did not wear a condom and "she let him continue". Not rape.

Anna walks into the police office to report a sexual molestation / rape before even checking the condom that she left in her house to verify what she imagined happened?

"if it was broken as she thought, but she says she thinks she still has the condom at home and will look at it"

Did she get it later, and is there DNA and evidence of malfeasance?


Lots of slut shaming but nothing about CIA connections.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8803575&postcount=3860

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8803942&postcount=3898

Thats only two posts of a much larger database i have accumulated in this thread about his actions.