arthwollipot
Limerick Purist
Because a lot of the facts aren't known. It appears to me like you're filling in blanks with your own theories, and quite frankly they're not looking good.Why? What is inconsistent with the known facts?
Because a lot of the facts aren't known. It appears to me like you're filling in blanks with your own theories, and quite frankly they're not looking good.Why? What is inconsistent with the known facts?
Dropping off the childish taunts for the moment: do you think that is a plausible reading of events and available information? If not, why not?
Because a lot of the facts aren't known. It appears to me like you're filling in blanks with your own theories, and quite frankly they're not looking good.
It is not outlandish or absurd, but I think it is a barely plausible reading of the events. If he were strong and confident, I think he would have initiated a confrontation earlier.
I think more likely he was annoyed and perhaps somewhat fearful, but thought it was unlikely that they would actually assault him in broad daylight, so he just tried to avoid them, not in a fearful way as, "I need to get the hell out of here before these guys kill me", but in a more nervous, "I don't know what these jackasses are up to and I really don't want to find out."
And each time they cut him off, I'll bet that the anxiety grew.
By the time he saw the gun, I think it was a "fight or flight" moment, and he chose fight.
See above, or read the last two pages. A poster asserted Arbery was "exhausted from running for his life". I noted that he hadn't run far, and had a lot of time to do so, relatively. This seems more a low-speed conflict.
Upthread, the NYT posted a map of the distance covered and the back-and-forth route taken. It wasn't far, like a couple football fields total. That's barely a walking pace, as another poster noted. To throw the contrast more starkly, I said that a serious runner could drop a mile in like 4 minutes, so a couple hundred yards in 8 minutes indicated slow moving, even allowing for back and forth juking.
Then everyone went ape **** about 4 minute miles.
Star witness (and murder suspect/defendant) Roddy said Arbery did just that. Said he tried to get into one of the trucks..
If you say so. I don't see a lot of evidence on either side.The competing theory requires more filling in the blanks. Occam has my back.
Because your whole assertion here is nothing but a load of complete BS.
Arbery was an outside linebacker in American Football at High School.... linebackers get nowhere near dropping four minute miles!
If you say so. I don't see a lot of evidence on either side.
I guess that's what criminal trials are for, right?
Star witness Roddy said Arbery did just that. Said he tried to get into one of the trucks.
i've asked this before: look at the video. See all that wooded cover on either side of the road? Think Arbery didn't see it?
Have you ever run from police cars (hopefully as a kid)? You. Get. Off. The. Road. If you stay diddy bopping around on the asphalt, you're not afraid, or tying to escape. You're ******* with them.
The argument is that he was running for his life in fear of being shot and run over. I don't think anyone would have the luxury of rationing out how quickly they got the hell out of there.
I am specifically not saying "200 yards", and using the more imprecise "couple football fields", because the upthread map is only loosely scaled. I'm also confident it would not have been a consistent pace, with stopping and turning around to whittle the average rate down, which accounts for the time lags.
But I do think it shows that this was no frantic sprint for survival. He was toying with them, I think, and staying +/- on their asphalt turf.
This is precious.
Psst...Arbery wasn't a 17 yr old high school football player anymore; he was a 25 yr old runner, as we are told. What do you picture every teenybopper lineman in high school to be anyway, like 300lbs or something? He was a kid.
Btw, that you are handwaving the actual argument and harping on irrelevant trivialities is telling.
OK. Specifically, now: what was I wrong about?
Near as I can tell, my statement was 100% accurate, and confirmed by several other posters.
The competing theory requires more filling in the blanks. Occam has my back.
Didn't they hit him with the car hard enough to leave a mark on the car at one time?
I'm just wondering what any of this has to do with the fact that someone was murdered.
But I do think it shows that this was no frantic sprint for survival. He was toying with them, I think, and staying +/- on their asphalt turf.
It makes a great distraction and moved the discussion from the murderers actions to the victims failures to perform to proper expectations of any black man.
You've been quite critical of others making leaps of logic here, but your repeated assertion that Arbery was somehow trying to stick it to these CHUDs deliberately is one hell of a whopper.
I can think of a lot of more plausible explanations why someone being menaced in public might stick to public roads and not sprint off to a secluded area, and "toying" with his pursuers strikes me as especially implausible.
Perhaps Arbery thought he would be safer if he stayed in the public eye, perhaps he thought his pursuers would leave him alone if he continued his jog and ignored them, perhaps he thought others would see the situation and intervene on his behalf. Perhaps he thought the police may be on there way and hopefully defuse the situation.
All these explanations strike me as much more plausible than the idea that he was slowly jogging around "their turf" as some display of dominance. That somehow, the unarmed jogger being pursued by two separate chase vehicles that were steadily escalating the violence felt that he was in control of the situation, strikes me as patently absurd.